• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Influence of gastric residual assessment in preterm neonates on time to achieve enteral feeding (the GRASS trial)-Multi-centre, assessor-blinded randomised clinical trial

A. Branagan, C. Murphy, A. O'Sullivan, I. Bodnarova, S. Feyereislova, I. Berka, J. Miletin, Z. Stranak

. 2024 ; 183 (5) : 2325-2332. [pub] 20240301

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24014146
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) od 2012-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Family Health Database (ProQuest) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: Gastric residual measurement is routinely performed in premature infants prior to feeding despite a lack of evidence of benefit. We aimed to evaluate if the exclusion of routine gastric residual measurement and evaluation has an impact on the time taken to achieve full enteral feeding in preterm neonates. METHODS: International multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Clinically stable, appropriate for gestational age infants between 26+0 and 30+6 weeks of gestation and less than 1.5 kg birth weight were eligible. Infants were randomised to the intervention arm (no monitoring of gastric aspirates) or control arm (routine care). Primary outcome was the achievement of enteral feeds of 100 ml/kg/day by day 5 of life. RESULTS: Ninety-five infants were recruited with 88 included in an intention-to-treat analysis, 45 in the intervention arm and 43 in the control arm. There was no imbalance in baseline characteristics. Thirty-three (73.3%) infants in the intervention group and 32 infants (74.4%) in the control group reached full feeds by day 5 of life (p = 0.91) with no difference in median time to full feeds. There were no statistically significant differences in survival or the major morbidities of prematurity. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in time to attainment of enteral feeds of 100 ml/kg/day in premature infants when gastric residuals were not monitored. In the absence of a clinical benefit to routine monitoring, it may be appropriate to discontinue this practice and only monitor residuals when clinical concern of feeding intolerance or gastrointestinal pathology arises in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03111329- https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Registered 06/04/2017. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Previous randomized trials have shown little benefit to the performance of routine assessment of gastric residuals in preterm infants. Despite this, they continue to be performed due to concerns from observational data regarding development of NEC. Meta-analysis to date has failed to answer the question regarding NEC. WHAT IS NEW: • In very low birth weight infants who are fed using modern feeding practice of faster feed advancement, to minimize use of central access and parenteral nutrition, exclusion of routine checks of gastric residuals did not increase the proportion of infants reaching full enteral feeds by day 5. No harm was seen when residual checks were not performed. • In the absence of a clinical benefit to the routine performance of gastric residuals in very low birth weight infants, it may be appropriate to discontinue their use and instead check residuals when clinical concern of pathology arises.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24014146
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240905134036.0
007      
ta
008      
240725s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00431-024-05483-w $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38427039
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Branagan, A $u The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. branagaa@tcd.ie $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152205372
245    10
$a Influence of gastric residual assessment in preterm neonates on time to achieve enteral feeding (the GRASS trial)-Multi-centre, assessor-blinded randomised clinical trial / $c A. Branagan, C. Murphy, A. O'Sullivan, I. Bodnarova, S. Feyereislova, I. Berka, J. Miletin, Z. Stranak
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Gastric residual measurement is routinely performed in premature infants prior to feeding despite a lack of evidence of benefit. We aimed to evaluate if the exclusion of routine gastric residual measurement and evaluation has an impact on the time taken to achieve full enteral feeding in preterm neonates. METHODS: International multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Clinically stable, appropriate for gestational age infants between 26+0 and 30+6 weeks of gestation and less than 1.5 kg birth weight were eligible. Infants were randomised to the intervention arm (no monitoring of gastric aspirates) or control arm (routine care). Primary outcome was the achievement of enteral feeds of 100 ml/kg/day by day 5 of life. RESULTS: Ninety-five infants were recruited with 88 included in an intention-to-treat analysis, 45 in the intervention arm and 43 in the control arm. There was no imbalance in baseline characteristics. Thirty-three (73.3%) infants in the intervention group and 32 infants (74.4%) in the control group reached full feeds by day 5 of life (p = 0.91) with no difference in median time to full feeds. There were no statistically significant differences in survival or the major morbidities of prematurity. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in time to attainment of enteral feeds of 100 ml/kg/day in premature infants when gastric residuals were not monitored. In the absence of a clinical benefit to routine monitoring, it may be appropriate to discontinue this practice and only monitor residuals when clinical concern of feeding intolerance or gastrointestinal pathology arises in this group of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03111329- https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Registered 06/04/2017. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Previous randomized trials have shown little benefit to the performance of routine assessment of gastric residuals in preterm infants. Despite this, they continue to be performed due to concerns from observational data regarding development of NEC. Meta-analysis to date has failed to answer the question regarding NEC. WHAT IS NEW: • In very low birth weight infants who are fed using modern feeding practice of faster feed advancement, to minimize use of central access and parenteral nutrition, exclusion of routine checks of gastric residuals did not increase the proportion of infants reaching full enteral feeds by day 5. No harm was seen when residual checks were not performed. • In the absence of a clinical benefit to the routine performance of gastric residuals in very low birth weight infants, it may be appropriate to discontinue their use and instead check residuals when clinical concern of pathology arises.
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a enterální výživa $x metody $7 D004750
650    _2
$a gestační stáří $7 D005865
650    12
$a novorozenec nedonošený $7 D007234
650    _2
$a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Murphy, C $u The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
700    1_
$a O'Sullivan, A $u The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
700    1_
$a Bodnarova, I $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Feyereislova, S $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Berka, I $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic $u 3rd School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Miletin, J $u The Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic $u UCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland $u 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stranak, Z $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic $u 3rd School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00010930 $t European journal of pediatrics. Supplement $x 1432-1076 $g Roč. 183, č. 5 (2024), s. 2325-2332
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38427039 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240725 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240905134030 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2143747 $s 1226012
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 183 $c 5 $d 2325-2332 $e 20240301 $i 1432-1076 $m European journal of pediatrics. Supplement $n Eur J Pediatr $x MED00010930
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240725

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...