-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
How much prophylaxis is enough in haemophilia
M. Carcao, V. Selvaratnam, J. Blatny
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu přehledy, časopisecké články
PubMed
38523288
DOI
10.1111/hae.14964
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- faktor VIII terapeutické užití MeSH
- hemofilie A * farmakoterapie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- protilátky bispecifické * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis has become standard of care for all persons with haemophilia (PWH) with a severe phenotype. However, 'standard prophylaxis' with either factor or non-factor therapies (currently only emicizumab available) is prohibitively expensive for much of the world. We sought to address the question of 'How much prophylaxis is enough?' and 'Can it be individualized?' and specifically 'Can emicizumab be individualized?'. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on prophylaxis in haemophilia since its inception in the 1950s to the present, the development of more and less intense factor prophylaxis regimens and their outcomes and additionally the published outcomes of prophylaxis with low dose emicizumab. RESULTS: What these experiences collectively show is that low dose emicizumab does result in significant benefits to patients whilst being much less expensive than a "one size fits all" emicizumab prophylaxis approach. We also took note that some non-factor therapies still in development are individualized given that high doses of these can potentially put patients at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis is now clearly accepted as standard of care for PWH with a severe phenotype but now in a very short time a large assortment of different treatment options for prophylaxis have become/are becoming available and the haemophilia community will need to determine how to best use these recognizing that no 'one treatment fits all'.
Department of Paediatrics Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
Division of Haematology Oncology
Hematology Department Ampang Hospital Ampang Selangor Malaysia
Hospital Bory Bratislava Slovakia and Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24014424
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905133405.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725e20240324enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/hae.14964 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38523288
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Carcao, Manuel $u Division of Haematology/Oncology; Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000153501763
- 245 10
- $a How much prophylaxis is enough in haemophilia / $c M. Carcao, V. Selvaratnam, J. Blatny
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis has become standard of care for all persons with haemophilia (PWH) with a severe phenotype. However, 'standard prophylaxis' with either factor or non-factor therapies (currently only emicizumab available) is prohibitively expensive for much of the world. We sought to address the question of 'How much prophylaxis is enough?' and 'Can it be individualized?' and specifically 'Can emicizumab be individualized?'. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on prophylaxis in haemophilia since its inception in the 1950s to the present, the development of more and less intense factor prophylaxis regimens and their outcomes and additionally the published outcomes of prophylaxis with low dose emicizumab. RESULTS: What these experiences collectively show is that low dose emicizumab does result in significant benefits to patients whilst being much less expensive than a "one size fits all" emicizumab prophylaxis approach. We also took note that some non-factor therapies still in development are individualized given that high doses of these can potentially put patients at risk. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis is now clearly accepted as standard of care for PWH with a severe phenotype but now in a very short time a large assortment of different treatment options for prophylaxis have become/are becoming available and the haemophilia community will need to determine how to best use these recognizing that no 'one treatment fits all'.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a hemofilie A $x farmakoterapie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D006467
- 650 12
- $a protilátky bispecifické $x škodlivé účinky $7 D018033
- 650 _2
- $a faktor VIII $x terapeutické užití $7 D005169
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Selvaratnam, Veena $u Hematology Department, Ampang Hospital, Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia
- 700 1_
- $a Blatny, Jan $u Hospital Bory, Bratislava, Slovakia and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000162619157 $7 xx0034546
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001964 $t Haemophilia $x 1365-2516 $g Roč. 30 Suppl 3 (20240324), s. 86-94
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38523288 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905133359 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143908 $s 1226290
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 30 Suppl 3 $c - $d 86-94 $e 20240324 $i 1365-2516 $m Haemophilia $n Haemophilia $x MED00001964
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725