-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of the Dental Materials TheraCal LC, TheraCal PT, ApaCal ART and Biodentine Used in Vital Pulp Therapy: In Vitro Study
B. Novotná, P. Holík, Y. Morozova, M. Rosa, A. Galandáková, K. Langová
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
IGA_LF_2024_008
Palacký University Olomouc
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2015
Europe PubMed Central
od 2015
ProQuest Central
od 2013-03-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2013-03-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
PubMed
39195093
DOI
10.3390/dj12080249
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of selected resin-modified materials used in direct contact with the dental pulp (TheraCal LC, TheraCal PT, and ApaCal ART) with calcium silicate cement (Biodentine). (2) Methods: The mouse fibroblast Balb/3T3 cell line and the extracts of tested materials in four concentrations were used for the testing. An MTT assay was performed in three independent experiments with six replicates for each concentration of tested material. The cell viability (%) and cytotoxicity were expressed (cytotoxic effect is considered in cases where the cell viability is lower than 70%). The mean of the cell viability and the standard deviation were expressed for each material at all concentrations. ANOVA and Dunnet's post hoc tests were used for the statistical analysis. All of these tests were performed at the 0.05 significance level. (3) Results: At all concentrations, the cell viability was statistically significantly lower (p ≤ 0.002) for all tested materials compared to Biodentine. ApaCal ART showed a high level of cytotoxicity at all concentrations (cell viability lower than 47.71%, p < 0.0001). The same result was found for TheraCal LC at concentrations of 100%, 50% and 25% and TheraCal PT at concentrations of 100% and 50%. TheraCal LC at a 10% concentration (cell viability 68.18%) and TheraCal PT at a 25% concentration (cell viability 60.63%) indicated potential cytotoxicity. TheraCal PT at a 10% concentration was not found to be cytotoxic (cell viability 79.18%, p = 0.095). (4) Conclusion: The resin-modified calcium silicate and calcium phosphate materials showed higher cytotoxic potential, so they should be used with caution when in direct contact with the dental pulp.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24018060
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241016081940.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241008s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/dj12080249 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39195093
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Novotná, Barbora $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Palackého 12, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000187884272
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of the Dental Materials TheraCal LC, TheraCal PT, ApaCal ART and Biodentine Used in Vital Pulp Therapy: In Vitro Study / $c B. Novotná, P. Holík, Y. Morozova, M. Rosa, A. Galandáková, K. Langová
- 520 9_
- $a (1) Background: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of selected resin-modified materials used in direct contact with the dental pulp (TheraCal LC, TheraCal PT, and ApaCal ART) with calcium silicate cement (Biodentine). (2) Methods: The mouse fibroblast Balb/3T3 cell line and the extracts of tested materials in four concentrations were used for the testing. An MTT assay was performed in three independent experiments with six replicates for each concentration of tested material. The cell viability (%) and cytotoxicity were expressed (cytotoxic effect is considered in cases where the cell viability is lower than 70%). The mean of the cell viability and the standard deviation were expressed for each material at all concentrations. ANOVA and Dunnet's post hoc tests were used for the statistical analysis. All of these tests were performed at the 0.05 significance level. (3) Results: At all concentrations, the cell viability was statistically significantly lower (p ≤ 0.002) for all tested materials compared to Biodentine. ApaCal ART showed a high level of cytotoxicity at all concentrations (cell viability lower than 47.71%, p < 0.0001). The same result was found for TheraCal LC at concentrations of 100%, 50% and 25% and TheraCal PT at concentrations of 100% and 50%. TheraCal LC at a 10% concentration (cell viability 68.18%) and TheraCal PT at a 25% concentration (cell viability 60.63%) indicated potential cytotoxicity. TheraCal PT at a 10% concentration was not found to be cytotoxic (cell viability 79.18%, p = 0.095). (4) Conclusion: The resin-modified calcium silicate and calcium phosphate materials showed higher cytotoxic potential, so they should be used with caution when in direct contact with the dental pulp.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Holík, Pavel $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Palackého 12, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Morozova, Yuliya $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Palackého 12, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rosa, Matej $u Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Palackého 12, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000308828438
- 700 1_
- $a Galandáková, Adéla $u Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Langová, Kateřina $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00215623 $t Dentistry journal $x 2304-6767 $g Roč. 12, č. 8 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39195093 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241016081936 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2196445 $s 1230011
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 12 $c 8 $e 20240807 $i 2304-6767 $m Dentistry journal $n Dent J (Basel) $x MED00215623
- GRA __
- $a IGA_LF_2024_008 $p Palacký University Olomouc
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241008