• Something wrong with this record ?

Real-world effectiveness of cladribine as an escalation strategy for MS: Insights from the Czech nationwide ReMuS registry

P. Potuznik, J. Drahota, D. Horakova, M. Peterka, A. Mazouchova, D. Matyas, Z. Pavelek, M. Vachova, E. Recmanova, I. Stetkarova, J. Libertinova, J. Mares, P. Stourac, M. Grunermelova, A. Martinkova, J. Adamkova, P. Hradilek, R. Ampapa, M. Dufek,...

. 2024 ; 16 (-) : 11795735241262743. [pub] 20240724

Status not-indexed Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Cladribine, a selective immune reconstitution therapy, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: Provide experience with cladribine therapy in a real-world setting. METHODS: This is a registry-based retrospective observational cohort study. First, using data from the Czech nationwide registry ReMuS, we analysed patients who initiated cladribine from September 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Second, we analysed a subgroup of patients who initiated cladribine between September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020, thus possessing a follow-up period of at least 2 years. We evaluated demographic and MS characteristics including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before and after cladribine administration, relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adherence. RESULTS: In total, 617 patients (335 with follow-up of at least 2 years) started cladribine therapy in the study period (mean age 37.0, mean disease duration 8.4 years, 74.1% females). In most cases, cladribine was administered as a second-line drug, a total of 80.7% had been escalated from a platform DMT. During 2 years before cladribine initiation, the average annualised relapse rate (ARR) was .67. Following cladribine initiation, the ARR decreased to .28 in the first year and .22 in the second year. Overall, across the entire two-year treatment period, 69.0% of patients were relapse-free and the average ARR was .25. As for EDSS development, the median baseline EDSS was 2.5 and remained stable even after 24 months. The adherence to treatment ranged of around 90%. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study confirms the efficacy of cladribine in real-world settings, especially in patients who are not treatment-naïve. In addition, the study shows an exceptionally high adherence rate, a finding that underscores the invaluable role of cladribine, but also the value of registry-based studies in capturing real-world clinical practice.

1st Department of Neurology University Hospital U Svate Anny and Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Economic Statistics Prague University of Economics and Business Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen Charles University Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Palacky University and University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital Ceske Budejovice Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital of Jihlava Jihlava Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital Pardubice Pardubice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology KZ a s Hospital Teplice Teplice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Tomas Bata Hospital Zlin Czech Republic

Department of Neurology University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Neurology University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty Ostrava University Ostrava Czech Republic

Endowment Fund IMPULS Prague Czech Republic

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018174
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241016082017.0
007      
ta
008      
241008e20240724xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/11795735241262743 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39055049
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Potuznik, Pavel $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000182417798
245    10
$a Real-world effectiveness of cladribine as an escalation strategy for MS: Insights from the Czech nationwide ReMuS registry / $c P. Potuznik, J. Drahota, D. Horakova, M. Peterka, A. Mazouchova, D. Matyas, Z. Pavelek, M. Vachova, E. Recmanova, I. Stetkarova, J. Libertinova, J. Mares, P. Stourac, M. Grunermelova, A. Martinkova, J. Adamkova, P. Hradilek, R. Ampapa, M. Dufek, E. Kubala Havrdova, D. Stastna
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Cladribine, a selective immune reconstitution therapy, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: Provide experience with cladribine therapy in a real-world setting. METHODS: This is a registry-based retrospective observational cohort study. First, using data from the Czech nationwide registry ReMuS, we analysed patients who initiated cladribine from September 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Second, we analysed a subgroup of patients who initiated cladribine between September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020, thus possessing a follow-up period of at least 2 years. We evaluated demographic and MS characteristics including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before and after cladribine administration, relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adherence. RESULTS: In total, 617 patients (335 with follow-up of at least 2 years) started cladribine therapy in the study period (mean age 37.0, mean disease duration 8.4 years, 74.1% females). In most cases, cladribine was administered as a second-line drug, a total of 80.7% had been escalated from a platform DMT. During 2 years before cladribine initiation, the average annualised relapse rate (ARR) was .67. Following cladribine initiation, the ARR decreased to .28 in the first year and .22 in the second year. Overall, across the entire two-year treatment period, 69.0% of patients were relapse-free and the average ARR was .25. As for EDSS development, the median baseline EDSS was 2.5 and remained stable even after 24 months. The adherence to treatment ranged of around 90%. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study confirms the efficacy of cladribine in real-world settings, especially in patients who are not treatment-naïve. In addition, the study shows an exceptionally high adherence rate, a finding that underscores the invaluable role of cladribine, but also the value of registry-based studies in capturing real-world clinical practice.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Drahota, Jiri $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u Endowment Fund IMPULS, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000334162094
700    1_
$a Horakova, Dana $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Peterka, Marek $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000205884592
700    1_
$a Mazouchova, Aneta $u Endowment Fund IMPULS, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Economic Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Matyas, David $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pavelek, Zbysek $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000217728781
700    1_
$a Vachova, Marta $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, KZ a.s., Hospital Teplice, Teplice, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000028158724X
700    1_
$a Recmanova, Eva $u Department of Neurology, Tomas Bata Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stetkarova, Ivana $u Department of Neurology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Libertinova, Jana $u Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mares, Jan $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stourac, Pavel $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Grunermelova, Marketa $u Department of Neurology, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Martinkova, Alena $u Department of Neurology, Hospital Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Adamkova, Jana $u Department of Neurology, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hradilek, Pavel $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ampapa, Radek $u Department of Neurology, Hospital of Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dufek, Michal $u 1st Department of Neurology, University Hospital U Svate Anny and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kubala Havrdova, Eva $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Stastna, Dominika $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324184847
773    0_
$w MED00215617 $t Journal of central nervous system disease $x 1179-5735 $g Roč. 16 (20240724), s. 11795735241262743
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39055049 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241016082012 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2196485 $s 1230125
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 16 $c - $d 11795735241262743 $e 20240724 $i 1179-5735 $m Journal of central nervous system disease $n J Cent Nerv Syst Dis $x MED00215617
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...