PURPOSE: Anterior and posterior reconstructions of pelvic structures are used during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to obtain better continence outcomes. This study was conducted to evaluate the Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS), a novel postprostatectomy reconstruction technique. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, controlled, partially randomized and blinded experiment. The statistical analysis was based on the generalized linear modeling (GLM) framework with random effects: the logit link was used to model the probability of achieving continence and the logarithmic link was used to evaluate the overall score of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The significance of the fixed effects and all possible two-way interactions was tested using the critical level of 0.05. RESULTS: The probability of achieving the continence significantly depends on the neurovascular bundle sparing (p < 0.001) and the time after the surgery (p < 0.001). Analogously, the expected ICIQ-SF score significantly depends on the nerve-sparing status (p = 0.035) and the time after the surgery (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference between the unilateral or bilateral nerve sparing was found. The ARVUS technique seems to perform slightly worse with respect to the expected continence, but this difference is within the margins of random fluctuations (p = 0.715). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates a significant positive association between the nerve-sparing approach and the patient's continence, however, regardless of the unilateral or bilateral approach. In terms of the continence rate, no statistically significant benefits of ARVUS were observed.

2nd Urology department of Slovak Medical University F D Roosevelt hospital Banská Bystrica Slovakia

Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Vascular Surgery Central Military and Faculty Hospital Ružomberok Slovakia

Faculty of Medicine Comenius University in Bratislava Bratislava Slovakia

Faculty of Medicine Slovak Medical University Bratislava Slovakia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Sooriakumaran P, Nyberg T, Akre O, Haendler L, Heus I, Olsson M, Carlsson S, Roobol MJ, Steineck G, Wiklund P (2014) Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ 348:g1502 PubMed DOI PMC

Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Kaouk J, Menon M, Mottrie A, Myers RP, Patel V, Tewari A, Villers A, Artibani W (2016) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol 970(2):301–311 DOI

Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Walsh E et al (2016) ProtecT Study Group. Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1425–1437 PubMed DOI PMC

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405–417 PubMed DOI

Dev HS, Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Tewari AK (2012) Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence. Nat Rev Urol 9(4):189–195 PubMed DOI

Heesakkers J, Farag F, Bauer RM, Sandhu J, De Ridder D, Stenzl A (2017) Pathophysiology and contributing factors in postprostatectomy incontinence: a review. Eur Urol 71(6):936–944 PubMed DOI

Student V, Vidlar A, Grepl M, Hartmann I, Buresova E, Student V (2017) Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: 1-year functional outcomes in a two-group randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 71(5):822–830 PubMed DOI

Mottrie A, Van Migem P, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Fonteyne E (2007) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol 52:746–751 PubMed DOI

Rocco B, Gregori A, Stener S, Santoro L, Bozzola A, Galli S, Knez R, Scieri F, Scaburri A, Gaboardi F (2007) Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter allows a rapid recovery of continence after transperitoneal video laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51:996–1003 PubMed DOI

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213 PubMed DOI PMC

Tholomier C, Bienz M, Hueber PA, Trinh QD, Hakim AE, Alhathal N, Lebeau T, Benayoun S, Valdivieso R, Liberman D, Saad F, Lattouf JB, Widmer H, Begin L, Latour M, Zorn KC (2014) Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases: the largest Canadian 5-year experience. Can Urol Assoc J 8:195–201 PubMed DOI PMC

Michl U, Tennstedt P, Feldmeier L, Mandel P, Oh SJ, Ahyai S, Budäus L, Chun FKH, Haese A, Heinzer H, Salomon G, Schlomm T, Steuber T, Huland H, Graefen M, Tilki D (2016) Nerve-sparing surgery technique, not the preservation of the neurovascular bundles, leads to improved long-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 69(4):584–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.037 PubMed DOI

Reeves F, Preece P, Kapoor J, Everaerts W, Murphy DG, Corcoran NM, Costello AJ (2015) Preservation of the neurovascular bundles is associated with improved time to continence after radical prostatectomy but not long-term continence rates: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68(4):692–704 PubMed DOI

Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Axén E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Persson J, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, Gustafsson O, Lagerkvist M, Jiborn T, Haglind E, Wiklund P (2015) LAPPRO steering committee. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol 67(3):559–568 PubMed DOI

Hefermehl L, Bossert K, Ramakrishnan VM, Seifert B, Lehmann KA (2018) Prospective analysis of the effects of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy on urinary continence based on expanded prostate cancer index composite and international index of erectile function scoring systems. Int Neurourol J 2(2):123–132 DOI

Preisser F, Theissen L, Wild P, Bartelt K, Kluth L, Köllermann J, Graefen M, Steuber T, Huland H, Tilki D, Roos F, Becker A, Chun FK, Mandel P (2019) Implementation of intraoperative frozen section during radical prostatectomy: short-term results from a German Tertiary-Care Center. Eur Urol Focus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.03.007 PubMed DOI

Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Manfredi M, Massa F, Piazzolla P, Manfrin D, Piana A, Tota D, Bollito E, Fiori C (2019) Three-dimensional elastic augmented-reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction technology: a step further in the identification of capsular involvement. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.037 PubMed DOI

Sugimura Y, Hioki T, Yamada Y, Fumino M, Inoue T (2001) An anterior urethral stitch improves urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 8:153–157 PubMed DOI

Noguchi M, Noda S, Nakashima O, Matsuoka K, Kojiro M (2004) Suspension technique improves rapid recovery of urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Kurume Med J 51:245–251 PubMed DOI

Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56:472–478 PubMed DOI

Grasso AA, Mistretta FA, Sandri M, Cozzi G, De Lorenzis E, Rosso M, Albo G, Palmisano F, Mottrie A, Haese A, Graefen M, Coelho R, Patel VR, Rocco B (2016) Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis. BJU Int 118:20–34 PubMed DOI

Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Patel VR (2011) Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 59:72–80 PubMed DOI

Sutherland DE, Linder B, Guzman AM, Hong M, Frazier HA 2nd, Engel JD, Bianco FJ Jr (2011) Posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial. J Urol 185(4):1262–1267 PubMed DOI

Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO (2008) Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a two group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 180:1018–1023 PubMed DOI

Cui J, Guo H, Li Y, Chen S, Zhu Y, Wang S, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang W, Han J, Chen P, Nie S, Yin G, Shi B (2017) Pelvic floor reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different surgical techniques. Sci Rep 7(1):2737 PubMed DOI PMC

Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, Yadav R, Bartsch G, Te A, Ioffe E, Pineda M, Mudaliar S, Nguyen L, Libertino J, Vaughan D (2008) Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int 101:871–877 PubMed DOI

Manfredi M, Checcucci E, Fiori C, Garrou D, Aimar R, Amparore D, De Luca S, Bombaci S, Stura I, Migliaretti G, Porpiglia F (2019) Total anatomical reconstruction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: focus on urinary continence recovery and related complications after 1000 procedures. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14716 PubMed DOI

External validation of an algorithm to personalize nerve sparing approaches during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with unilateral high-risk prostate cancer