-
Something wrong with this record ?
Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary vs de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT
A. Nagler, M. Labopin, J. Tischer, AM. Raiola, D. Kunadt, J. Vydra, D. Blaise, P. Chiusolo, R. Fanin, J. Winkler, E. Forcade, G. Van Gorkom, F. Ciceri, M. Mohty
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2016
PubMed Central
from 2016
Europe PubMed Central
from 2016
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2016
- MeSH
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute * therapy mortality MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Transplantation, Haploidentical * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Graft vs Host Disease etiology MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation * methods adverse effects MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients with primary refractory (PR) or first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML; n = 129) vs those with de novo AML (n = 590), who received HSCT between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of patients with sAML vs de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs 58.6%; P = .002). In 81.4% of patients with sAML , the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (P = .13). In multivariate analysis, haplo-HSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups: nonrelapse mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.98; P = .083), relapse incidence HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.4.7.-1.00; P = .051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and GVHD and relapse-free survival were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.76-1.28; P = .94), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.29; P = .97), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.27; P = .94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of haplo-HSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison with PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Udine Italy
CHU Bordeaux Hopital Haut Leveque Pessac France
Department of Hematology Sorbonne University Saint Antoine Hospital INSERM UMR 938 Paris France
Division of Haematology Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genoa Italy
Klinikum Grosshadern Munich Germany
Ospedale San Raffaele Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Milan Italy
Programme de Transplantation and Therapie Cellulaire Marseille France
University Hospital Erlangen Erlangen Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019350
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024111442.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012798 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38598754
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Nagler, Arnon $u Division of Haematology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel $1 https://orcid.org/0000000207631265
- 245 10
- $a Haploidentical transplantation in primary refractory/relapsed secondary vs de novo AML: from the ALWP/EBMT / $c A. Nagler, M. Labopin, J. Tischer, AM. Raiola, D. Kunadt, J. Vydra, D. Blaise, P. Chiusolo, R. Fanin, J. Winkler, E. Forcade, G. Van Gorkom, F. Ciceri, M. Mohty
- 520 9_
- $a We compared the outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 719 patients with primary refractory (PR) or first relapse (Rel) secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML; n = 129) vs those with de novo AML (n = 590), who received HSCT between 2010 and 2022. A higher percentage of patients with sAML vs de novo AML had PR disease (73.6% vs 58.6%; P = .002). In 81.4% of patients with sAML , the antecedent hematological disorder was myelodysplastic syndrome. Engraftment was 83.5% vs 88.4% in sAML and de novo AML, respectively (P = .13). In multivariate analysis, haplo-HSCT outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups: nonrelapse mortality hazard ratio (HR), 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.98; P = .083), relapse incidence HR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.4.7.-1.00; P = .051). The HRs for leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, and GVHD and relapse-free survival were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.76-1.28; P = .94), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.29; P = .97), and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.77-1.27; P = .94), respectively. We conclude that outcomes of haplo-HSCT with PTCy are not different for PR/Rel sAML in comparison with PR/Rel de novo AML, a finding of major clinical importance.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a akutní myeloidní leukemie $x terapie $x mortalita $7 D015470
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a haploidentická transplantace $7 D000075442
- 650 12
- $a transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D018380
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli $x etiologie $7 D006086
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Labopin, Myriam $u Department of Haematology, EBMT Paris Study Office, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France $u Department of Hematology, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France
- 700 1_
- $a Tischer, Johanna $u Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Raiola, Anna Maria $u IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kunadt, Desiree $u University Hospital TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Vydra, Jan $u Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000242743895
- 700 1_
- $a Blaise, Didier $u Programme de Transplantation & Therapie Cellulaire, Marseille, France $1 https://orcid.org/0000000256849447
- 700 1_
- $a Chiusolo, Patrizia $u Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000213551587
- 700 1_
- $a Fanin, Renato $u Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine, Udine, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Winkler, Julia $u University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Forcade, Edouard $u CHU Bordeaux, Hopital Haut-Leveque, Pessac, France
- 700 1_
- $a Van Gorkom, Gwendolyn $u University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Ciceri, Fabio $u Ospedale San Raffaele, Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Mohty, Mohamad $u Department of Haematology, EBMT Paris Study Office, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France $u Department of Hematology, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France
- 773 0_
- $w MED00194912 $t Blood advances $x 2473-9537 $g Roč. 8, č. 15 (2024), s. 4223-4233
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38598754 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024111436 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2201907 $s 1231323
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 8 $c 15 $d 4223-4233 $e 20240813 $i 2473-9537 $m Blood advances $n Blood Adv $x MED00194912
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015