-
Something wrong with this record ?
A Randomized Trial of Electrographic Flow-Guided Redo Ablation for Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF)
VY. Reddy, A. Langbein, J. Petru, T. Szili-Torok, M. Funasako, L. Dinshaw, S. Wijchers, A. Rillig, SG. Spitzer, R. Bhagwandien, A. Metzner, MH. Kong, P. Neuzil
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac methods MeSH
- Electrocardiography MeSH
- Atrial Fibrillation * surgery physiopathology MeSH
- Catheter Ablation * methods adverse effects MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Reoperation statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables full spatiotemporal reconstruction of organized wavefront propagation to identify extrapulmonary vein sources of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: FLOW-AF (A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW [EGF] Algorithm Technology [Ablamap Software] to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) was multicenter, randomized controlled study of EGF mapping to: 1) stratify a nonparoxysmal AF population undergoing redo ablation; 2) guide ablation of these extrapulmonary vein AF sources; and 3) improve AF recurrence outcomes. METHODS: FLOW-AF enrolled persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF)/long-standing PerAF patients undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF maps were recorded from standardized biatrial basket positions. Patients with source activity ≥26.5% were randomized 1:1 to PVI + EGF-guided ablation vs PVI only; patients without sources ≥26.5% threshold were not randomized. Follow-up and electrocardiographic monitoring occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 85 patients (age 65.6 ± 9.3 years, 37% female, 24% long-standing PerAF). Thirty-four (40%) patients had no sources greater than threshold; at least 1 source greater than threshold was present in 46 (60%) (EGF-guided ablation, n = 22; control group, n = 26). Patients with sources were older (68.2 vs 62.6 years; P = 0.005) with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (2.8 vs 1.9; P = 0.001). The freedom from safety events was 97.2%, and 95% of EGF-identified sources were successfully ablated. In randomized patients, AF-free survival at 12 months was 68% for EGF-guided ablation vs 17% for the control group (P = 0.042); freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter at 12 months was 51% vs 14% (P = 0.103), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In nonparoxysmal AF patients undergoing redo ablation, EGF mapping identified AF sources in 60% of patients, and could be successfully ablated in 95%. Compared with PVI alone, PVI + source ablation improved AF-free survival by 51% on an absolute basis. (FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology [A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW (EGF) Algorithm Technology (Ablamap Software) to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation]; NCT04473963).
Ablacon Inc Wheat Ridge Colorado USA
Department of Cardiology Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
Department of Cardiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York USA
Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019549
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110801.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.03.040 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38842972
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org
- 245 12
- $a A Randomized Trial of Electrographic Flow-Guided Redo Ablation for Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF) / $c VY. Reddy, A. Langbein, J. Petru, T. Szili-Torok, M. Funasako, L. Dinshaw, S. Wijchers, A. Rillig, SG. Spitzer, R. Bhagwandien, A. Metzner, MH. Kong, P. Neuzil
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables full spatiotemporal reconstruction of organized wavefront propagation to identify extrapulmonary vein sources of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: FLOW-AF (A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW [EGF] Algorithm Technology [Ablamap Software] to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) was multicenter, randomized controlled study of EGF mapping to: 1) stratify a nonparoxysmal AF population undergoing redo ablation; 2) guide ablation of these extrapulmonary vein AF sources; and 3) improve AF recurrence outcomes. METHODS: FLOW-AF enrolled persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF)/long-standing PerAF patients undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF maps were recorded from standardized biatrial basket positions. Patients with source activity ≥26.5% were randomized 1:1 to PVI + EGF-guided ablation vs PVI only; patients without sources ≥26.5% threshold were not randomized. Follow-up and electrocardiographic monitoring occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 85 patients (age 65.6 ± 9.3 years, 37% female, 24% long-standing PerAF). Thirty-four (40%) patients had no sources greater than threshold; at least 1 source greater than threshold was present in 46 (60%) (EGF-guided ablation, n = 22; control group, n = 26). Patients with sources were older (68.2 vs 62.6 years; P = 0.005) with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (2.8 vs 1.9; P = 0.001). The freedom from safety events was 97.2%, and 95% of EGF-identified sources were successfully ablated. In randomized patients, AF-free survival at 12 months was 68% for EGF-guided ablation vs 17% for the control group (P = 0.042); freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter at 12 months was 51% vs 14% (P = 0.103), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In nonparoxysmal AF patients undergoing redo ablation, EGF mapping identified AF sources in 60% of patients, and could be successfully ablated in 95%. Compared with PVI alone, PVI + source ablation improved AF-free survival by 51% on an absolute basis. (FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology [A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW (EGF) Algorithm Technology (Ablamap Software) to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation]; NCT04473963).
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $7 D001281
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a katetrizační ablace $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017115
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a elektrofyziologické techniky kardiologické $x metody $7 D022062
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Langbein, Anke $u Praxisklinik Herz und Gefaesse, Dresden, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Petru, Jan $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Szili-Torok, Tamas $u Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Funasako, Moritoshi $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dinshaw, Leon $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Wijchers, Sip $u Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Rillig, Andreas $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Spitzer, Stefan G $u Praxisklinik Herz und Gefaesse, Dresden, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Bhagwandien, Rohit $u Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Metzner, Andreas $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Kong, Melissa H $u Ablacon, Inc, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Neuzil, Petr $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 10, č. 8 (2024), s. 1856-1869
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38842972 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110755 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202024 $s 1231522
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 10 $c 8 $d 1856-1869 $e 20240605 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015