• Something wrong with this record ?

A Randomized Trial of Electrographic Flow-Guided Redo Ablation for Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF)

VY. Reddy, A. Langbein, J. Petru, T. Szili-Torok, M. Funasako, L. Dinshaw, S. Wijchers, A. Rillig, SG. Spitzer, R. Bhagwandien, A. Metzner, MH. Kong, P. Neuzil

. 2024 ; 10 (8) : 1856-1869. [pub] 20240605

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables full spatiotemporal reconstruction of organized wavefront propagation to identify extrapulmonary vein sources of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: FLOW-AF (A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW [EGF] Algorithm Technology [Ablamap Software] to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) was multicenter, randomized controlled study of EGF mapping to: 1) stratify a nonparoxysmal AF population undergoing redo ablation; 2) guide ablation of these extrapulmonary vein AF sources; and 3) improve AF recurrence outcomes. METHODS: FLOW-AF enrolled persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF)/long-standing PerAF patients undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF maps were recorded from standardized biatrial basket positions. Patients with source activity ≥26.5% were randomized 1:1 to PVI + EGF-guided ablation vs PVI only; patients without sources ≥26.5% threshold were not randomized. Follow-up and electrocardiographic monitoring occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 85 patients (age 65.6 ± 9.3 years, 37% female, 24% long-standing PerAF). Thirty-four (40%) patients had no sources greater than threshold; at least 1 source greater than threshold was present in 46 (60%) (EGF-guided ablation, n = 22; control group, n = 26). Patients with sources were older (68.2 vs 62.6 years; P = 0.005) with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (2.8 vs 1.9; P = 0.001). The freedom from safety events was 97.2%, and 95% of EGF-identified sources were successfully ablated. In randomized patients, AF-free survival at 12 months was 68% for EGF-guided ablation vs 17% for the control group (P = 0.042); freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter at 12 months was 51% vs 14% (P = 0.103), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In nonparoxysmal AF patients undergoing redo ablation, EGF mapping identified AF sources in 60% of patients, and could be successfully ablated in 95%. Compared with PVI alone, PVI + source ablation improved AF-free survival by 51% on an absolute basis. (FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology [A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW (EGF) Algorithm Technology (Ablamap Software) to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation]; NCT04473963).

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24019549
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024110801.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.03.040 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38842972
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: vivek.reddy@mountsinai.org
245    12
$a A Randomized Trial of Electrographic Flow-Guided Redo Ablation for Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF) / $c VY. Reddy, A. Langbein, J. Petru, T. Szili-Torok, M. Funasako, L. Dinshaw, S. Wijchers, A. Rillig, SG. Spitzer, R. Bhagwandien, A. Metzner, MH. Kong, P. Neuzil
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables full spatiotemporal reconstruction of organized wavefront propagation to identify extrapulmonary vein sources of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: FLOW-AF (A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW [EGF] Algorithm Technology [Ablamap Software] to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) was multicenter, randomized controlled study of EGF mapping to: 1) stratify a nonparoxysmal AF population undergoing redo ablation; 2) guide ablation of these extrapulmonary vein AF sources; and 3) improve AF recurrence outcomes. METHODS: FLOW-AF enrolled persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF)/long-standing PerAF patients undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF maps were recorded from standardized biatrial basket positions. Patients with source activity ≥26.5% were randomized 1:1 to PVI + EGF-guided ablation vs PVI only; patients without sources ≥26.5% threshold were not randomized. Follow-up and electrocardiographic monitoring occurred at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 85 patients (age 65.6 ± 9.3 years, 37% female, 24% long-standing PerAF). Thirty-four (40%) patients had no sources greater than threshold; at least 1 source greater than threshold was present in 46 (60%) (EGF-guided ablation, n = 22; control group, n = 26). Patients with sources were older (68.2 vs 62.6 years; P = 0.005) with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (2.8 vs 1.9; P = 0.001). The freedom from safety events was 97.2%, and 95% of EGF-identified sources were successfully ablated. In randomized patients, AF-free survival at 12 months was 68% for EGF-guided ablation vs 17% for the control group (P = 0.042); freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter at 12 months was 51% vs 14% (P = 0.103), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In nonparoxysmal AF patients undergoing redo ablation, EGF mapping identified AF sources in 60% of patients, and could be successfully ablated in 95%. Compared with PVI alone, PVI + source ablation improved AF-free survival by 51% on an absolute basis. (FLOW-AF: A Study to Evaluate the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW EGF Technology [A Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Reliability of the Ablacon Electrographic FLOW (EGF) Algorithm Technology (Ablamap Software) to Identify AF Sources and Guide Ablation Therapy in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation]; NCT04473963).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017115
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a reoperace $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012086
650    _2
$a elektrofyziologické techniky kardiologické $x metody $7 D022062
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Langbein, Anke $u Praxisklinik Herz und Gefaesse, Dresden, Germany
700    1_
$a Petru, Jan $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Szili-Torok, Tamas $u Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Funasako, Moritoshi $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dinshaw, Leon $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Wijchers, Sip $u Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Rillig, Andreas $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Spitzer, Stefan G $u Praxisklinik Herz und Gefaesse, Dresden, Germany
700    1_
$a Bhagwandien, Rohit $u Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Metzner, Andreas $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Kong, Melissa H $u Ablacon, Inc, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, USA
700    1_
$a Neuzil, Petr $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00193518 $t JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $x 2405-5018 $g Roč. 10, č. 8 (2024), s. 1856-1869
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38842972 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024110755 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202024 $s 1231522
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 10 $c 8 $d 1856-1869 $e 20240605 $i 2405-5018 $m JACC. Clinical electrophysiology $n JACC Clin Electrophysiol $x MED00193518
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...