-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Educational inequalities in cervical cancer screening participation in 24 European countries
A. Altová, I. Kulhánová, K. Reisser, P. Netrdová, J. Brož, TA. Eikemo, M. Balaj, M. Lustigová
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- časná detekce nádoru * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- disparity zdravotní péče statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * diagnóza MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- socioekonomické faktory MeSH
- stupeň vzdělání * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Cervical cancer screening (CCS) is an important public health measure for early detection of cervical cancer and prevents a large proportion of cervical cancer deaths. However, participation in CCS is relatively low and varies substantially by country and socio-economic position. This study aimed to provide up-to-date participation rates and estimates on educational inequalities in CCS participation in 24 European countries with population-based CCS programmes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Using data from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) conducted in 2019, 80,479 women aged 25-64 years were included in the analyses. First, standardized participation rates and standardized participation rates by educational attainment were calculated for all 24 countries based on each country-specific screening programme organization. Second, a series of generalized logistic models was applied to assess the effect of education on CCS participation. RESULTS: Screening participation rates ranged from 34.1% among low-educated women in Romania to 97.1% among high-educated women in Finland. We observed that lower-educated women were less likely to attend CCS than their higher-educated counterparts. Largest educational gaps were found in Sweden (odds ratio [OR] = 6.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.89-10.35) and Poland (odds ratio = 5.80, 95% CI = 4.34-7.75). CONCLUSION: Population-based screening initiatives have successfully reduced participation differences between women with medium and high educational attainment in some countries; however, persistent disparities still exist between women with low and high levels of education. There is an urgent need to increase participation rates of CCS, especially among lower-educated women.
Faculty of Medicine Leipzig University Liebigstraße 04103 Leipzig Germany
National Institute of Public Health Šrobárova 49 48 Praha 10 100 00 Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019565
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110629.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015e20240527ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.04.036 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38805834
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Altová, A $u Department of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, Praha 2, 12800, Czech Republic. Electronic address: anna.altova@natur.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Educational inequalities in cervical cancer screening participation in 24 European countries / $c A. Altová, I. Kulhánová, K. Reisser, P. Netrdová, J. Brož, TA. Eikemo, M. Balaj, M. Lustigová
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Cervical cancer screening (CCS) is an important public health measure for early detection of cervical cancer and prevents a large proportion of cervical cancer deaths. However, participation in CCS is relatively low and varies substantially by country and socio-economic position. This study aimed to provide up-to-date participation rates and estimates on educational inequalities in CCS participation in 24 European countries with population-based CCS programmes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. METHODS: Using data from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) conducted in 2019, 80,479 women aged 25-64 years were included in the analyses. First, standardized participation rates and standardized participation rates by educational attainment were calculated for all 24 countries based on each country-specific screening programme organization. Second, a series of generalized logistic models was applied to assess the effect of education on CCS participation. RESULTS: Screening participation rates ranged from 34.1% among low-educated women in Romania to 97.1% among high-educated women in Finland. We observed that lower-educated women were less likely to attend CCS than their higher-educated counterparts. Largest educational gaps were found in Sweden (odds ratio [OR] = 6.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.89-10.35) and Poland (odds ratio = 5.80, 95% CI = 4.34-7.75). CONCLUSION: Population-based screening initiatives have successfully reduced participation differences between women with medium and high educational attainment in some countries; however, persistent disparities still exist between women with low and high levels of education. There is an urgent need to increase participation rates of CCS, especially among lower-educated women.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x diagnóza $7 D002583
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a časná detekce nádoru $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D055088
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 12
- $a stupeň vzdělání $7 D004522
- 650 _2
- $a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
- 650 _2
- $a disparity zdravotní péče $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D054625
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kulhánová, I $u Department of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, Praha 2, 12800, Czech Republic; Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, Praha 2, 12800, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Reisser, K $u Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße, 04103, Leipzig, Germany; Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Netrdová, P $u Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, Praha 2, 12800, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brož, J $u Department of Internal Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, Praha 5, 150 06, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Eikemo, T A $u Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Bulls veg 17049 Trondheim, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Balaj, M $u Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Bulls veg 17049 Trondheim, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Lustigová, M $u Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, Praha 2, 12800, Czech Republic; National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 49/48, Praha 10, 100 00, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004004 $t Public health $x 1476-5616 $g Roč. 233 (20240527), s. 1-7
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38805834 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110623 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202035 $s 1231538
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 233 $c - $d 1-7 $e 20240527 $i 1476-5616 $m Public health $n Public Health $x MED00004004
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015