-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Early history of posterior malleolus fractures in ankle fractures
J. Bartoníček, S. Rammelt, O. Naňka
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, historické články, přehledy
- MeSH
- dějiny 19. století MeSH
- dějiny 20. století MeSH
- fraktury kotníku * dějiny chirurgie diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rentgendiagnostika metody MeSH
- vnitřní fixace fraktury dějiny metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dějiny 19. století MeSH
- dějiny 20. století MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- historické články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
INTRODUCTION: No comprehensive treatise on the early history of fractures of posterior malleolus (PM) has yet been published, and many substantial discoveries have fallen into oblivion-particularly if not having been published in English originally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: Early history of PM fractures from their first description up to the beginnings of their operative treatment may be divided into three basic periods, covering the era between 1828 and 1940. In the pre-radiological period (1828-1895), description of PM injuries was based merely on the autopsy findings in deceased patients. The first mentions of this injury were published by the British authors. In the radiologic period (1899-1916), the x-ray examination started a revolution also in diagnostics of ankle fractures, with the first radiographs performed as early as in 1899. Radiographic examination had subsequently become an integral part of the diagnostics of these injuries and initiated a number of significant studies of PM fractures. The first detailed mention of a PM injury may be found in the French and German literature. The period of early operative treatment (1918-1940), i.e., open reduction and internal fixation of PM, was started by the younger post-WWI generation, primarily the French surgeons, represented by Gaston Picot. His operative technique and the first six cases treated operatively between 1918 and 1921 were described in 1921 by Edouard Huc. Picot himself published his technique in great detail in 1923. CONCLUSION: The early history of diagnostics and treatment of PM fractures witnesses the remarkable body of knowledge gathered about that topic by numerous visionary surgeons predominantly French and German surgeons immediately before and after World War I. They substantially contributed to the radiological examination and operative treatment of this injury.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019625
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110621.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00264-023-06080-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38157040
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Bartoníček, Jan $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Central Military Hospital, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000222281443 $7 nlk19990073000
- 245 10
- $a Early history of posterior malleolus fractures in ankle fractures / $c J. Bartoníček, S. Rammelt, O. Naňka
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: No comprehensive treatise on the early history of fractures of posterior malleolus (PM) has yet been published, and many substantial discoveries have fallen into oblivion-particularly if not having been published in English originally. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature search was performed in original publications and historical sources. RESULTS: Early history of PM fractures from their first description up to the beginnings of their operative treatment may be divided into three basic periods, covering the era between 1828 and 1940. In the pre-radiological period (1828-1895), description of PM injuries was based merely on the autopsy findings in deceased patients. The first mentions of this injury were published by the British authors. In the radiologic period (1899-1916), the x-ray examination started a revolution also in diagnostics of ankle fractures, with the first radiographs performed as early as in 1899. Radiographic examination had subsequently become an integral part of the diagnostics of these injuries and initiated a number of significant studies of PM fractures. The first detailed mention of a PM injury may be found in the French and German literature. The period of early operative treatment (1918-1940), i.e., open reduction and internal fixation of PM, was started by the younger post-WWI generation, primarily the French surgeons, represented by Gaston Picot. His operative technique and the first six cases treated operatively between 1918 and 1921 were described in 1921 by Edouard Huc. Picot himself published his technique in great detail in 1923. CONCLUSION: The early history of diagnostics and treatment of PM fractures witnesses the remarkable body of knowledge gathered about that topic by numerous visionary surgeons predominantly French and German surgeons immediately before and after World War I. They substantially contributed to the radiological examination and operative treatment of this injury.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 20. století $7 D049673
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 19. století $7 D049672
- 650 12
- $a fraktury kotníku $x dějiny $x chirurgie $x diagnóza $7 D064386
- 650 _2
- $a rentgendiagnostika $x metody $7 D011859
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x dějiny $x metody $7 D005593
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a historické články $7 D016456
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Rammelt, Stefan $u University Center of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, DE-01307, Dresden, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000311416493
- 700 1_
- $a Naňka, Ondřej $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic. Ondrej.Nanka@lf1.cuni.cz $1 https://orcid.org/000000026300395X $7 mzk2006348905
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 48, č. 8 (2024), s. 2259-2267
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38157040 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110615 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202077 $s 1231598
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 48 $c 8 $d 2259-2267 $e 20231229 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015