-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial
P. Cimflova, N. Singh, M. Kappelhof, JM. Ospel, A. Sehgal, N. Kashani, MA. Almekhlafi, AM. Demchuk, J. Berrouschot, F. Dorn, ME. Kelly, BH. Buck, TS. Field, D. Dowlatshahi, M. Tymianski, MD. Hill, M. Goyal
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, multicentrická studie
PubMed
37491383
DOI
10.1136/jnis-2023-020553
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cerebrální infarkt diagnostické zobrazování terapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- reperfuze * metody MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- trombektomie metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Incomplete reperfusion (IR) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can be a consequence of residual occlusion, no-reflow phenomenon, or collateral counterpressure. Data on the impact of these phenomena on clinical outcome are limited. METHODS: Patients from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial with IR (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b) were compared with those with complete or near-complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c-3) on the final angiography run. Final runs were assessed for (a) an MT-accessible occlusion, or (b) a non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern. The primary clinical outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Our imaging outcome was infarction in IR territory on follow-up imaging. Unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained. RESULTS: Of 1105 patients, 443 (40.1%) with IR and 506 (46.1%) with complete or near-complete reperfusion were included. An MT-accessible occlusion was identified in 147/443 patients (33.2%) and a non-MT-accessible occlusion in 296/443 (66.8%). As compared with patients with near-complete/complete reperfusion, patients with IR had significantly lower chances of achieving mRS 0-2 at 90 days (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). Rates of mRS 0-2 were lower in the MT-accessible occlusion group as compared with the non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern group (aIRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, and aIRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, respectively). More patients with MT-accessible occlusion patterns developed infarcts in the non-reperfused territory as compared with patients with non-MT occlusion patterns (68.7% vs 46.3%). CONCLUSION: IR was associated with worse clinical outcomes than near-complete/complete reperfusion. Two-thirds of our patients with IR had non-MT-accessible occlusion patterns which were associated with better clinical and imaging outcomes compared with those with MT-accessible occlusion patterns.
Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Universitatsspital Basel Basel Switzerland
Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Calgary Alberta Canada
Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Radiology University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada
Division of Neurology University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Division of Neurology University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine Ottawa Ontario Canada
Hotchkis Brain Institute University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine Calgary Alberta Canada
Klinik für Neuroradiologie Universitätsklinikum Bonn Bonn Germany
NoNO Inc Toronto Ontario Canada
University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019738
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024111002.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1136/jnis-2023-020553 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37491383
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Cimflova, Petra $u Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Medical Imaging and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia $1 https://orcid.org/000000018058383X
- 245 10
- $a Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial / $c P. Cimflova, N. Singh, M. Kappelhof, JM. Ospel, A. Sehgal, N. Kashani, MA. Almekhlafi, AM. Demchuk, J. Berrouschot, F. Dorn, ME. Kelly, BH. Buck, TS. Field, D. Dowlatshahi, M. Tymianski, MD. Hill, M. Goyal
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Incomplete reperfusion (IR) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can be a consequence of residual occlusion, no-reflow phenomenon, or collateral counterpressure. Data on the impact of these phenomena on clinical outcome are limited. METHODS: Patients from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial with IR (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b) were compared with those with complete or near-complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c-3) on the final angiography run. Final runs were assessed for (a) an MT-accessible occlusion, or (b) a non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern. The primary clinical outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2 at 90 days. Our imaging outcome was infarction in IR territory on follow-up imaging. Unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained. RESULTS: Of 1105 patients, 443 (40.1%) with IR and 506 (46.1%) with complete or near-complete reperfusion were included. An MT-accessible occlusion was identified in 147/443 patients (33.2%) and a non-MT-accessible occlusion in 296/443 (66.8%). As compared with patients with near-complete/complete reperfusion, patients with IR had significantly lower chances of achieving mRS 0-2 at 90 days (aIRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.91). Rates of mRS 0-2 were lower in the MT-accessible occlusion group as compared with the non-MT-accessible occlusion pattern group (aIRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, and aIRR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, respectively). More patients with MT-accessible occlusion patterns developed infarcts in the non-reperfused territory as compared with patients with non-MT occlusion patterns (68.7% vs 46.3%). CONCLUSION: IR was associated with worse clinical outcomes than near-complete/complete reperfusion. Two-thirds of our patients with IR had non-MT-accessible occlusion patterns which were associated with better clinical and imaging outcomes compared with those with MT-accessible occlusion patterns.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a cerebrální infarkt $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D002544
- 650 12
- $a reperfuze $x metody $7 D015424
- 650 _2
- $a trombektomie $x metody $7 D017131
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Singh, Nishita $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Internal Medicine - Neurology division, University of Manitoba Max Rady College of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000336470904
- 700 1_
- $a Kappelhof, Manon $u Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152508955
- 700 1_
- $a Ospel, Johanna M $u Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300296764
- 700 1_
- $a Sehgal, Arshia $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Kashani, Nima $u University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/000000029752784X
- 700 1_
- $a Almekhlafi, Mohammed A $u Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Hotchkis Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000195508197
- 700 1_
- $a Demchuk, Andrew M $u Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Hotchkis Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Berrouschot, Joerg $u Klinik für Neurologie und Neurologische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Altenburger Land GmbH, Altenburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Dorn, Franziska $u Klinik für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190938307
- 700 1_
- $a Kelly, Michael E $u Department of Neurosurgery, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000232782620
- 700 1_
- $a Buck, Brian H $u Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Field, Thalia S $u Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Dowlatshahi, Dariush $u Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Tymianski, Michael $u NoNO Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Hill, Michael D $u Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Hotchkis Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000262691543
- 700 1_
- $a Goyal, Mayank $u Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada mgoyal2412@gmail.com $u Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $u Hotchkis Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000190602109
- 773 0_
- $w MED00179154 $t Journal of neurointerventional surgery $x 1759-8486 $g Roč. 16, č. 8 (2024), s. 809-814
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37491383 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110956 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202141 $s 1231711
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 16 $c 8 $d 809-814 $e 20240716 $i 1759-8486 $m Journal of neurointerventional surgery $n J Neurointerv Surg $x MED00179154
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015