-
Something wrong with this record ?
Anonymous Gamete Donation: a Case for Balancing Under Article 8 ECHR
J. Valc
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Legal Case
- MeSH
- Tissue Donors legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Oocyte Donation * legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Confidentiality legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Human Rights legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Tissue and Organ Procurement legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Legal Case MeSH
- Geographicals
- France MeSH
Anonymous gamete donation creates a specific conflict between human rights and public interests under Article 8 of the ECHR. This was first assessed in the ECtHR's landmark decision in Gauvin-Fournis and Silliau v. France of 7 September 2023. This article critically analyses this judgment, taking into account the European legal framework for anonymous gamete donation, the recommendations of the competent authorities and the previous case law of the ECtHR on the right to know one's biological origin as an integral part of one's identity that is protected under the right to private and family life.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24020004
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024110931.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1163/15718093-bja10130 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38782402
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Valc, Jakub $u Faculty of Law, Masaryk University 112471 Veveří 158, Brno 611 80 Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000240802679 $7 mub20241218554
- 245 10
- $a Anonymous Gamete Donation: a Case for Balancing Under Article 8 ECHR / $c J. Valc
- 520 9_
- $a Anonymous gamete donation creates a specific conflict between human rights and public interests under Article 8 of the ECHR. This was first assessed in the ECtHR's landmark decision in Gauvin-Fournis and Silliau v. France of 7 September 2023. This article critically analyses this judgment, taking into account the European legal framework for anonymous gamete donation, the recommendations of the competent authorities and the previous case law of the ECtHR on the right to know one's biological origin as an integral part of one's identity that is protected under the right to private and family life.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a darování oocytu $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D018587
- 650 _2
- $a důvěrnost informací $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D003219
- 650 _2
- $a dárci tkání $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D014019
- 650 _2
- $a získávání tkání a orgánů $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D009927
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidská práva $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D006806
- 651 _2
- $a Francie $7 D005602
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a soudní případy $7 D016418
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001621 $t European journal of health law $x 1571-8093 $g Roč. 31, č. 4 (2024), s. 411-432
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38782402 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024110925 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2202315 $s 1231977
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 31 $c 4 $d 411-432 $e 20240522 $i 1571-8093 $m European journal of health law $n Eur J Health Law $x MED00001621
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015
