• Something wrong with this record ?

Dynamic spinal orthoses self-reported effects in patients with back pain due to vertebral fragility fractures: A multi-center prospective cohort study

A. de Sire, L. Lippi, D. Calafiore, N. Marotta, K. Mezian, R. Chiaramonte, C. Cisari, M. Vecchio, A. Ammendolia, M. Invernizzi

. 2024 ; 37 (4) : 929-941. [pub] -

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24020051

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) commonly result from low bone mass and microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue. spinal orthoses are common non-pharmacological options for managing vertebral fracture pain. However, the effects of spinal orthoses on pain, physical functioning, and quality of life (QoL) are still debated. OBJECTIVE: This survey aimed to investigate the patients-reported outcomes of a dynamic spinal orthosis prescribed in the routine clinical practice of VFFs management. METHODS: This multi-center national-wide prospective cohort study assessed older patients (aged > 60 years) diagnosed with acute VFFs and prescribed with a dynamic spinal orthosis (Spinfast®). A survey questionnaire was realized and included sections on patient characterization, osteoporosis characterization, spinal orthosis, clinical outcomes, pain medications, and osteoporosis medications. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and after three months. A total of 68 patients completed the questionnaire at three months. Most patients had one or two VFFs and were treated with pain medications and osteoporosis medications. Compliance and tolerability of the spinal orthosis were assessed, and clinical outcomes such as pain intensity, physical functioning, and QoL were measured. RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in outcomes between age subgroups. Italian physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians were commonly involved in the management of VFFs patients. Sixty-six patients completed the questionnaire. The results showed that pain intensity, physical functioning and QoL improved after three months of spinal orthosis wearing (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The correct management of VFFs is mandatory to improve pain and reduce disability, and our findings suggested a positive role of dynamic spinal orthosis to improve the comprehensive management of VFFs patients. However, high-quality research trials are warranted to provide clear recommendations for the correct clinical management of VFF.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24020051
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024110912.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3233/BMR-230177 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38217575
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a de Sire, Alessandro $u Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy $u Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University, Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $u Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
245    10
$a Dynamic spinal orthoses self-reported effects in patients with back pain due to vertebral fragility fractures: A multi-center prospective cohort study / $c A. de Sire, L. Lippi, D. Calafiore, N. Marotta, K. Mezian, R. Chiaramonte, C. Cisari, M. Vecchio, A. Ammendolia, M. Invernizzi
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) commonly result from low bone mass and microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue. spinal orthoses are common non-pharmacological options for managing vertebral fracture pain. However, the effects of spinal orthoses on pain, physical functioning, and quality of life (QoL) are still debated. OBJECTIVE: This survey aimed to investigate the patients-reported outcomes of a dynamic spinal orthosis prescribed in the routine clinical practice of VFFs management. METHODS: This multi-center national-wide prospective cohort study assessed older patients (aged > 60 years) diagnosed with acute VFFs and prescribed with a dynamic spinal orthosis (Spinfast®). A survey questionnaire was realized and included sections on patient characterization, osteoporosis characterization, spinal orthosis, clinical outcomes, pain medications, and osteoporosis medications. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and after three months. A total of 68 patients completed the questionnaire at three months. Most patients had one or two VFFs and were treated with pain medications and osteoporosis medications. Compliance and tolerability of the spinal orthosis were assessed, and clinical outcomes such as pain intensity, physical functioning, and QoL were measured. RESULTS: The results showed no significant differences in outcomes between age subgroups. Italian physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians were commonly involved in the management of VFFs patients. Sixty-six patients completed the questionnaire. The results showed that pain intensity, physical functioning and QoL improved after three months of spinal orthosis wearing (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The correct management of VFFs is mandatory to improve pain and reduce disability, and our findings suggested a positive role of dynamic spinal orthosis to improve the comprehensive management of VFFs patients. However, high-quality research trials are warranted to provide clear recommendations for the correct clinical management of VFF.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a fraktury páteře $x rehabilitace $7 D016103
650    12
$a protetické prostředky $7 D009989
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    12
$a osteoporotické fraktury $x rehabilitace $7 D058866
650    _2
$a bolesti zad $x rehabilitace $x terapie $7 D001416
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a zpráva o sobě $7 D057566
650    _2
$a měření bolesti $7 D010147
650    _2
$a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Lippi, Lorenzo $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy $u Translational Medicine, Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy $u Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
700    1_
$a Calafiore, Dario $u Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Neurosciences, ASST Carlo Poma, Mantova, Italy
700    1_
$a Marotta, Nicola $u Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy $u Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
700    1_
$a Mezian, Kamal $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chiaramonte, Rita $u Section of Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
700    1_
$a Cisari, Carlo $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy
700    1_
$a Vecchio, Michele $u Section of Pharmacology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy $u Unit of Rehabilitation, AOU Policlinico G. Rodolico S.Marco, Catania, Italy
700    1_
$a Ammendolia, Antonio $u Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy $u Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy
700    1_
$a Invernizzi, Marco $u Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy $u Translational Medicine, Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione (DAIRI), Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
773    0_
$w MED00007274 $t Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation $x 1878-6324 $g Roč. 37, č. 4 (2024), s. 929-941
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38217575 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024110906 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2202345 $s 1232024
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 37 $c 4 $d 929-941 $e - $i 1878-6324 $m Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation $n J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil $x MED00007274
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options