-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
RAD51 recruitment but not replication fork stability associates with PARP inhibitor response in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft models
F. Talens, VON. Teixeira, YP. Kok, M. Chen, EH. Rosenberg, R. Debipersad, EW. Duiker, N. van den Tempel, M. Janatova, P. Zemankova, PM. Nederlof, GBA. Wisman, Z. Kleibl, S. de Jong, MATM. van Vugt
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2020
PubMed Central
od 2019
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
od 2019-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2019
PubMed
39611179
DOI
10.1093/narcan/zcae044
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) are currently used to treat BRCA1/2 mutant cancers. Although PARPi sensitivity has been attributed to homologous recombination (HR) defects, other roles of HR factors have also been linked to response to PARPi, including replication fork protection. In this study, we investigated PARPi sensitivity in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in relation to HR proficiency and replication fork protection. Analysis of BRCA1/2 status showed that in our cohort of 31 ovarian cancer PDX models 22.6% harbored a BRCA1/2 alteration (7/31), and 48.3% (15/31) were genomically unstable as measured by copy number alteration analysis. In vivo, PARPi olaparib response was measured in 15 selected PDX models. Functional assessment of HR using ex vivo irradiation-induced RAD51 foci formation identified all olaparib-sensitive PDX models, including four models without BRCA1/2 alterations. In contrast, replication fork protection or replication speed in ex vivo tumor tissue did not correlate with olaparib response. Targeted panel sequencing in olaparib-sensitive models lacking BRCA1/2 alterations revealed a MUS81 variant as a possible mechanism underlying PARPi sensitivity. Combined, we show that ex vivo RAD51 analysis effectively predicts in vivo olaparib response and revealed a subset of PARPi-sensitive, HR-deficient ovarian cancer PDX models, lacking a BRCA1/2 alteration.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25002029
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250123101948.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250117s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/narcan/zcae044 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39611179
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Talens, Francien $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 245 10
- $a RAD51 recruitment but not replication fork stability associates with PARP inhibitor response in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft models / $c F. Talens, VON. Teixeira, YP. Kok, M. Chen, EH. Rosenberg, R. Debipersad, EW. Duiker, N. van den Tempel, M. Janatova, P. Zemankova, PM. Nederlof, GBA. Wisman, Z. Kleibl, S. de Jong, MATM. van Vugt
- 520 9_
- $a Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) are currently used to treat BRCA1/2 mutant cancers. Although PARPi sensitivity has been attributed to homologous recombination (HR) defects, other roles of HR factors have also been linked to response to PARPi, including replication fork protection. In this study, we investigated PARPi sensitivity in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in relation to HR proficiency and replication fork protection. Analysis of BRCA1/2 status showed that in our cohort of 31 ovarian cancer PDX models 22.6% harbored a BRCA1/2 alteration (7/31), and 48.3% (15/31) were genomically unstable as measured by copy number alteration analysis. In vivo, PARPi olaparib response was measured in 15 selected PDX models. Functional assessment of HR using ex vivo irradiation-induced RAD51 foci formation identified all olaparib-sensitive PDX models, including four models without BRCA1/2 alterations. In contrast, replication fork protection or replication speed in ex vivo tumor tissue did not correlate with olaparib response. Targeted panel sequencing in olaparib-sensitive models lacking BRCA1/2 alterations revealed a MUS81 variant as a possible mechanism underlying PARPi sensitivity. Combined, we show that ex vivo RAD51 analysis effectively predicts in vivo olaparib response and revealed a subset of PARPi-sensitive, HR-deficient ovarian cancer PDX models, lacking a BRCA1/2 alteration.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Teixeira, Vivian Oliviera Nunes $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Kok, Yannick P $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Mengting $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Rosenberg, Efraim H $u Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Debipersad, Rashmie $u Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Duiker, Evelien W $u Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a van den Tempel, Nathalie $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Janatova, Marketa $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Katerinska 32, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zemankova, Petra $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Katerinska 32, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Pathophysiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 5, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nederlof, Petra M $u Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Wisman, G Bea A $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Kleibl, Zdenek $u Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Katerinska 32, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Pathophysiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 5, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a de Jong, Steven $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a van Vugt, Marcel A T M $u Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713GZ Groningen, the Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000232024678
- 773 0_
- $w MED00209101 $t NAR cancer $x 2632-8674 $g Roč. 6, č. 4 (2024), s. zcae044
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39611179 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250117 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250123101942 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2254448 $s 1238032
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 6 $c 4 $d zcae044 $e 20241128 $i 2632-8674 $m NAR cancer $n NAR Cancer $x MED00209101
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250117