Appearance of levator ani muscle subdivision defects on level III vaginal support structures in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: an MRI study
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Grant Agency of Charles University research project Cooperatio (project no.207035)
lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy
PubMed
37119270
PubMed Central
PMC10415508
DOI
10.1007/s00192-023-05533-1
PII: 10.1007/s00192-023-05533-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Attachment patterns, Levator ani muscle, Level III, Magnetic resonance imaging,
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- pánevní dno zranění MeSH
- prolaps pánevních orgánů * diagnostické zobrazování etiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- vagina * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Injury of the levator ani muscle (LAM) is a significant risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The puborectalis (PRM) and pubovisceral (PVM) subdivisions are level III vaginal support structures. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in patterns of LAM subdivisions in healthy nulliparous women. Secondarily, we evaluated the presence of different LAM injury in a POP-symptomatic cohort. METHODS: This retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study included: 64 nulligravidae without any pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and 526 women of various parity with symptomatic POP. Primary outcome was PVM and PRM morphology on the axial planes: the attachment site on the pubic bone, and the visible separation/border between the PVM and PRM. The attachment was scored as "normal" or "abnormal". The "abnormal" attachment was divided in two types: "type I"-loss of the muscle substance, but preservation of the overall muscle architecture-and "type II"-muscle detachment from the pubic bone. RESULTS: The puboanal muscle (PAM) subdivision was evaluated as a representative part of the PVM. The PAM and PRM attachments and separation were distinguished in all asymptomatic nulliparae. PAM and PRM attachments did not significantly differ. POP group characteristics were parity 1.9 ± 0.8, instrumental delivery 5.6%, hysterectomy or POP surgery 60%, all Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stages, LAM defect 77.6% (PRM: 77.1%; PAM: 51.3%). Type I injuries were more frequent (PRM 54.7%; PAM 53.9%) compared with type II (PRM 29.4%; PAM 42.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A LAM defect was present in 77.6% of women with symptomatic POP. In PRM and PAM subdivisions type I injury was more frequent than type II.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Ruska 2411 87 100 00 Prague Czech Republic
Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Podolské nábřeží 157 147 00 Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;166:1717–1724. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-O. PubMed DOI
Kearney R, Sawhney R, DeLancey JO. Levator ani muscle anatomy evaluated by origin-insertion pairs. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:168–173. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128906.61529.6b. PubMed DOI PMC
Lawson J. Pelvic anatomy I. Pelvic floor muscles. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1974;54:244–252. PubMed PMC
Margulies RU, Huebner M, DeLancey JO. Origin and insertion points involved in levator ani muscle defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:251.e1–251.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.894. PubMed DOI PMC
Betschart C, Kim J, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Comparison of muscle fiber directions between different levator ani muscle subdivisions: in vivo MRI measurements in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1263–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2395-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Otcenasek M, Garuder-Burmester A, Haak LA, Grill R, Popken G, Baca V. Paravaginal defect: a new classification of fascial and muscle tears in the paravaginal region. Clin Anat. 2016;29:524–529. doi: 10.1002/ca.22694. PubMed DOI
Arenholt LTS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind-Kristensen M, DeLancey JOL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:661–673. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3096-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Kim J, Ramanah R, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. On the anatomy and histology of the pubovisceral muscle enthesis in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1366–1370. doi: 10.1002/nau.21032. PubMed DOI PMC
Kim J, Betschart C, Ramanah R, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Anatomy of the pubovisceral muscle origin: Macroscopic and microscopic findings within the injury zone. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:774–780. doi: 10.1002/nau.22649. PubMed DOI PMC
Huebner M, DeLancey JOL. Levels of pelvic floor support: what do they look like on magnetic resonance imaging? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1593–1595. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03986-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5–26. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9. PubMed DOI
Larson KA, Luo J, Yousuf A, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Measurement of the 3D geometry of the fascial arches in women with a unilateral levator defect and “architectural distortion”. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:57–63. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1528-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Tunn R, DeLancey JOL, Howard D, Ashton-Miller JA, Quint LE. Anatomic variations in the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in nulliparas evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:116–121. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.58. PubMed DOI
Margulies RU, Hsu Y, Kearney R, Stein T, Umek WH, DeLancey JO. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in magnetic resonance images. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1064–1069. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000214952.28605.e8. PubMed DOI PMC
Chou Q, DeLancey JO. A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance images. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:44–50. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.116368. PubMed DOI
DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250901.57095.ba. PubMed DOI
DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:46–53. PubMed PMC
Krcmar M, Horcicka L, Nemec M, Hanulikova P, Feyereisl J, Krofta L. Multilevel musculo-fascial defect magnetic resonance study of female pelvic floor: retrospective case control study in women with pelvic floor dysfunction after the first vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101:628–638. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14344. PubMed DOI PMC
Huebner M, Margulies RU, DeLancey JOL. Pelvic architectural distortion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:863–867. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0546-y. PubMed DOI PMC
DeLancey JO. Comparison of the puborectal muscle on MRI in women with POP and levator ani defects with those with normal support and no defect. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:73–77. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1527-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Trowbridge ER, Fultz NH, Patel DA, DeLancey JO, Fenner DE. Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:548.e1–548.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.054. PubMed DOI PMC
Berger MB, Morgan DM, DeLancey LO. Levator ani defect scores and pelvic organ prolapse: is there a threshold effect? Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(10):1375–1379. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2388-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Faulkner JA, Larkin LM, Clafin DR, Brooks SV. Age-related changes in the structure and function of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34:1091–1096. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04752.x. PubMed DOI
Alperin M, Cook M, Tuttle LJ, Esparza MC, Lieber RL. Impact of vaginal parity and aging on the architectural design of pelvic floor muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:312.e1–312.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.033. PubMed DOI PMC
Swenson CW, Masteling M, DeLancey JO, Nandikanti L, Schmidt P, Chen L. Aging effects on the pelvic floor support: a pilot study comparing young versus older nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:535–543. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04063-z. PubMed DOI PMC