Multilevel musculo-fascial defect magnetic resonance study of female pelvic floor: retrospective case control study in women with pelvic floor dysfunction after the first vaginal delivery
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
35322407
PubMed Central
PMC9564734
DOI
10.1111/aogs.14344
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- architectural distortion, delivery, levator ani muscle, magnetic resonance imaging, prolapse,
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční spektroskopie MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- pánevní dno * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- prolaps pánevních orgánů * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- prolaps MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- vedení porodu škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a detailed display of the pelvic floor structures responsible for normal pelvic floor anatomy. The aim of the study is to assess the appearance of musculo-fascial defects in women with pelvic floor dysfunction following first vaginal delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis of axial T3 (Tesla 3) MRI scans from a case control study of symptomatic (n = 149) and asymptomatic (n = 60) women after first vaginal delivery. Presence and severity of pelvic organ support and attachment system defects in three axial pelvic planes were assessed. RESULTS: In the symptomatic group, major muscular defects were found in 67.1% (for pubovisceral muscle complex) and 87.9% (for iliococcygeal muscle). Only 6.7% of major pubovisceral and 35.0% of major iliococcygeal defects were identified in the controls (p = 0.000). Prolapse patients had an odds ratio (OR) of 22.1 (95% CI 8.94-54.67) to have major pubovisceral muscle complex defect and OR of 4.9 (95% CI 1.51-15.71) to have major iliococcygeal muscle defect. Fascial defects were found in 60.4% and 83.2% the symptomatic group, respectively. Those with prolapse had an OR of 29.1 (95% CI 9.77-86.31) to have facial defect at the level of pubovisceral muscle complex and an OR of 16.9 (95% CI 7.62-37.69) to have fascial defect at the level of iliococcygeal muscle. Uterosacral ligaments detachment was associated with prolapse with an OR of 10.1 (95% CI 4.01-25.29). For the model based on combination on all MRI markers, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.921. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides comprehensive data about first vaginal delivery-induced changes in the levator ani muscle and endopelvic fascial attachment system. These changes are seen also in asymptomatic controls, but they are significantly less expressed.
3rd Medical Faculty Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Abdool Z, Shek K, Dietz H. The effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimensions and function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:89.e1‐89.e5. PubMed
Dietz HP. Forceps: towards obsolence or revival? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:347‐351. PubMed
Swenson CW, Masteling M, DeLancey J, Nandikanti L, Schmidt P, Chen L. Aging effects on pelvic floor support: a pilot study comparing young vs older nulliparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;31:535‐543. PubMed PMC
Huebner M, Margulies RU, DeLancey JOL. Pelvic architectural distortion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:863‐867. PubMed PMC
Morgan MD, Umek W, Stein T, Hsu Y, Guire K, JOL DL. Interrater reliability of assesing levator ani muscle defects with magnetic resonance images. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:773‐778. PubMed PMC
Chen L, Lisse S, Larson K, Berger M, Ashton‐Miller JA, JOL DL. Structural failure sites in anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:853‐862. PubMed PMC
Larson KA, Luo J, Yousuf A, Ashton‐Miller JA, JOL DL. Measurement of the 3D geometry of the fascial arches in women with a unilateral levator defect and “architectural distortion”. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:57‐63. PubMed PMC
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An international Urogynecological association (IUGA)/ international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5‐26. PubMed
Chou Q, JOL DL. A structured system to evaluate urethral support anatomy in magnetic resonance images. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:44‐50. PubMed
Strohbehn K, Ellis JH, Strohbehn JA, JOL DL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:277‐285. PubMed
DeLancey JOL, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295‐302. PubMed
Umek WH, Morgan DM, Ashton‐Miller JA, JOL DL. Quantitative analysis of uterosacral ligament origin and insertion points by magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:447‐451. PubMed PMC
Huebner M, DeLancey JOL. Levels of pelvic floor support: what do they look like on magnetic resonance imaging? Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1593‐1595. PubMed PMC
DeLancey JOL, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:46‐53. PubMed PMC
Ashton‐Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101:266‐296. PubMed
Kim J, Ramanah R, DeLancey JO, Ashton‐Miller JA. On the anatomy and histology of the pubocervical muscle enthesis in women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:1366‐1370. PubMed PMC
Chen L, Ashton‐Miller JA, Hsu Y, JOL DL. Interaction between apical supports and levator ani in anterior vaginal support: theoretical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:324‐332. PubMed PMC
Betschart C, Kim J, Miller JM, Ashton‐Miller JA, JOL DL. Comparison of muscle fibre directions between different levator ani muscle subdivisions: in vivo MRI measurements in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1263‐1268. PubMed PMC
Larson KA, Luo J, Guire KE, Chen L, Ashton‐Miller JA, JOL DL. 3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and anal apical defects. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:285‐293. PubMed PMC
Arenholt TS, Pedersen BG, Glavind K, Glavind‐Kristensen M, JOL DL. Paravaginal defect: anatomy, clinical findings, and imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:661‐673. PubMed PMC
Chen L, Ashton‐Miller JA, Hsu Y, JOL DL. Interaction between apical suports and levator ani in anterior vaginal support: theoretical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:324‐332. PubMed PMC
Kim J, Betschart C, Ramanah R, Ashton‐Miller JA, JOL DL. Anatomy of the pubocervical muscle origin: macroscopic and microscopic findings within the injury zone. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:774‐780. PubMed PMC
Berger MB, Morgan DM, JOL DL. Levator ani defect scores and pelvic organ prolapse: is there a threshold effect? Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1375‐1379. PubMed PMC