-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Treatment of Primary Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A. Suleja, M. Bilski, E. Laukhtina, T. Fazekas, A. Matsukawa, I. Tsuboi, S. Mancon, R. Schulz, TFW. Soeterik, M. Przydacz, Ł. Nyk, P. Rajwa, W. Majewski, R. Campi, SF. Shariat, M. Miszczyk
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2009
PubMed Central
od 2009
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2009
PubMed
39409897
DOI
10.3390/cancers16193276
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
CONTEXT: Surgery is the gold standard for the local treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but alternatives are emerging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the results of prospective studies using definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat primary localised RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023447274). We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for reports of prospective studies published since 2003, describing the outcomes of SBRT for localised RCC. Meta-analyses were performed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events (AEs) using generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs). Outcomes were presented as rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Risk-of-bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 2983 records, 13 prospective studies (n = 308) were included in the meta-analysis. The median diameter of the irradiated tumours ranged between 1.9 and 5.5 cm in individual studies. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 15 patients, and their estimated rate was 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01-0.11; n = 291). One- and two-year LC rates were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95-0.99; n = 293) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93-0.99; n = 253), while one- and two-year OS rates were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.88-0.98; n = 294) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.91; n = 224). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity, and the estimations were consistent after excluding studies at a high risk of bias in a sensitivity analysis. Major limitations include a relatively short follow-up, inhomogeneous reporting of renal function deterioration, and a lack of prospective comparative evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term results suggest that SBRT is a valuable treatment method for selected inoperable patients (or those who refuse surgery) with localised RCC associated with low rates of high-grade AEs and excellent LC. However, until the long-term data from randomised controlled trials are available, surgical management remains a standard of care in operable patients.
2nd Department of Urology Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education 01 813 Warsaw Poland
Brachytherapy Department Saint John's Cancer Center 20 090 Lublin Poland
Collegium Medicum Faculty of Medicine WSB University 41 300 Dąbrowa Górnicza Poland
Department of Biochemical Science Humanitas University 20072 Milan Italy
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence 50139 Florence Italy
Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center 3584 Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Radiotherapy Medical University of Lublin 20 059 Lublin Poland
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University 15006 Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna 1090 Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS 20089 Milan Italy
Department of Urology Jagiellonian University Medical College 30 688 Krakow Poland
Department of Urology Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo 105 8461 Japan
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia 40 800 Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology Semmelweis University 1083 Budapest Hungary
Department of Urology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo 693 8504 Japan
Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf 20251 Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX 75390 USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY 10065 USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery University of Jordan Amman 11942 Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University 119992 Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology 1010 Vienna Austria
Radiotherapy Department Saint John's Cancer Center 20 090 Lublin Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25002464
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250123101911.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250117s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/cancers16193276 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39409897
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Suleja, Agata $u III Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCNRIO), 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 245 10
- $a Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Treatment of Primary Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / $c A. Suleja, M. Bilski, E. Laukhtina, T. Fazekas, A. Matsukawa, I. Tsuboi, S. Mancon, R. Schulz, TFW. Soeterik, M. Przydacz, Ł. Nyk, P. Rajwa, W. Majewski, R. Campi, SF. Shariat, M. Miszczyk
- 520 9_
- $a CONTEXT: Surgery is the gold standard for the local treatment of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but alternatives are emerging. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the results of prospective studies using definitive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to treat primary localised RCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023447274). We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar for reports of prospective studies published since 2003, describing the outcomes of SBRT for localised RCC. Meta-analyses were performed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events (AEs) using generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs). Outcomes were presented as rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Risk-of-bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 2983 records, 13 prospective studies (n = 308) were included in the meta-analysis. The median diameter of the irradiated tumours ranged between 1.9 and 5.5 cm in individual studies. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 15 patients, and their estimated rate was 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01-0.11; n = 291). One- and two-year LC rates were 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95-0.99; n = 293) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.93-0.99; n = 253), while one- and two-year OS rates were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.88-0.98; n = 294) and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.91; n = 224). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity, and the estimations were consistent after excluding studies at a high risk of bias in a sensitivity analysis. Major limitations include a relatively short follow-up, inhomogeneous reporting of renal function deterioration, and a lack of prospective comparative evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term results suggest that SBRT is a valuable treatment method for selected inoperable patients (or those who refuse surgery) with localised RCC associated with low rates of high-grade AEs and excellent LC. However, until the long-term data from randomised controlled trials are available, surgical management remains a standard of care in operable patients.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Bilski, Mateusz $u Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland $u Brachytherapy Department, Saint John's Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland $u Radiotherapy Department, Saint John's Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000249623028
- 700 1_
- $a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119992 Moscow, Russia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000289530272
- 700 1_
- $a Fazekas, Tamás $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary $1 https://orcid.org/0000000300684089
- 700 1_
- $a Matsukawa, Akihiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Tsuboi, Ichiro $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8504, Japan
- 700 1_
- $a Mancon, Stefano $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy $u Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Schulz, Robert $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Soeterik, Timo F W $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, 3584 Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Przydacz, Mikołaj $u Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Krakow, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000273817420
- 700 1_
- $a Nyk, Łukasz $u Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000165021484
- 700 1_
- $a Rajwa, Paweł $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-800 Zabrze, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Majewski, Wojciech $u Radiotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCNRIO), 44-102 Gliwice, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Campi, Riccardo $u Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy $u Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152370888
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1010 Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA $u Research Centre for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5166/15731, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a Miszczyk, Marcin $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria $u Collegium Medicum-Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243750827
- 773 0_
- $w MED00173178 $t Cancers $x 2072-6694 $g Roč. 16, č. 19 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39409897 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250117 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250123101905 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2254590 $s 1238467
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 16 $c 19 $e 20240926 $i 2072-6694 $m Cancers $n Cancers (Basel) $x MED00173178
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250117