Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Safety and efficacy of intrathecal antibodies to Nogo-A in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

N. Weidner, R. Abel, D. Maier, K. Röhl, F. Röhrich, M. Baumberger, M. Hund-Georgiadis, M. Saur, J. Benito, K. Rehahn, M. Aach, A. Badke, J. Kriz, K. Barkovits, T. Killeen, L. Farner, M. Seif, M. Hubli, K. Marcus, MA. Maurer, B. Robert, R. Rupp,...

. 2025 ; 24 (1) : 42-53. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, klinické zkoušky, fáze II, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25002848
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2002-05-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2002-05-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2002-05-01 do Před 2 měsíci
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 2002-05-01 do Před 2 měsíci

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury results in permanent neurological impairment and disability due to the absence of spontaneous regeneration. NG101, a recombinant human antibody, neutralises the neurite growth-inhibiting protein Nogo-A, promoting neural repair and motor recovery in animal models of spinal cord injury. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal NG101 on recovery in patients with acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b clinical trial was done at 13 hospitals in the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, and Switzerland. Patients aged 18-70 years with acute, complete or incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (neurological level of injury C1-C8) within 4-28 days of injury were eligible for inclusion. Participants were initially randomly assigned 1:1 to intrathecal treatment with 45 mg NG101 or placebo (phosphate-buffered saline); 18 months into the study, the ratio was adjusted to 3:1 to achieve a final distribution of 2:1 to improve enrolment and drug exposure. Randomisation was done using a centralised, computer-based randomisation system and was stratified according to nine distinct outcome categories with a validated upper extremity motor score (UEMS) prediction model based on clinical parameters at screening. Six intrathecal injections were administered every 5 days over 4 weeks, starting within 28 days of injury. Investigators, study personnel, and study participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was change in UEMS at 6 months, analysed alongside safety in the full analysis set. The completed trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03935321. FINDINGS: From May 20, 2019, to July 20, 2022, 463 patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury were screened, 334 were deemed ineligible and excluded, and 129 were randomly assigned to an intervention (80 patients in the NG101 group and 49 in the placebo group). The full analysis set comprised 78 patients from the NG101 group and 48 patients from the placebo group. 107 (85%) patients were male and 19 (15%) patients were female, with a median age of 51·5 years (IQR 30·0-60·0). Across all patients, the primary endpoint showed no significant difference between groups (with UEMS change at 6 months 1·37 [95% CI -1·44 to 4·18]; placebo group mean 19·20 [SD 11·78] at baseline and 30·91 [SD 15·49] at day 168; NG101 group mean 18·23 [SD 15·14] at baseline and 31·31 [19·54] at day 168). Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (nine in the NG101 group and six in the placebo group). 25 severe adverse events were reported: 18 in 11 (14%) patients in the NG101 group and seven in six (13%) patients in the placebo group. Although no treatment-related fatalities were reported in the NG101 group, one fatality not related to treatment occurred in the placebo group. Infections were the most common adverse event affecting 44 (92%) patients in the placebo group and 65 (83%) patients in the NG101 group. INTERPRETATION: NG101 did not improve UEMS in patients with acute spinal cord injury. Post-hoc subgroup analyses assessing UEMS and Spinal Cord Independence Measure of self-care in patients with motor-incomplete injury indicated potential beneficial effects that require investigation in future studies. FUNDING: EU program Horizon2020; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation; Wings for Life; the Swiss Paraplegic Foundation; and the CeNeReg project of Wyss Zurich (University of Zurich and Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich).

BG Clinic Tübingen Tübingen Germany

BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH Zentrum für Rückenmarkverletzte und Klinik für Orthopädie Halle Germany

Clinic for Paraplegia Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH Bayreuth Germany

Clinic of Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology REHAB Basel Basel Switzerland

Clinical Study Coordination Center University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany

Department of Cardiology Angiology and Pneumonology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany

Department of Neurophysics Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences Leipzig Germany

Department of Spinal Cord Injuries BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum Germany

Epidemiology Biostatistics and Prevention Institute University of Zurich Switzerland

Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences Leipzig University Leipzig Germany

Fundacio Institut d'Investigacio en Ciencies de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Heidelberg Mannheim Heidelberg Mannheim Germany

Institute for Regenerative Medicine University of Zurich Switzerland

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada

Medical Proteome Analysis Center for Proteindiagnostics Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany

Orthopädische Klinik Hessisch Lichtenau Germany

Spinal Cord Injuries Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau Murnau Germany

Spinal Cord Injury Center Balgrist University Hospital University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Spinal Cord Injury Center Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg Germany

Spinal Cord Unit Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic

Swiss Paraplegic Centre Nottwil Switzerland

Treatment Centre for Spinal Cord Injuries Trauma Hospital Berlin Berlin Germany

Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging Institute of Neurology University College London London UK

Wyss Zurich Translational Center University and ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002848
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206103913.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00447-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39706632
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Weidner, Norbert $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: norbert.weidner@med.uni-heidelberg.de
245    10
$a Safety and efficacy of intrathecal antibodies to Nogo-A in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial / $c N. Weidner, R. Abel, D. Maier, K. Röhl, F. Röhrich, M. Baumberger, M. Hund-Georgiadis, M. Saur, J. Benito, K. Rehahn, M. Aach, A. Badke, J. Kriz, K. Barkovits, T. Killeen, L. Farner, M. Seif, M. Hubli, K. Marcus, MA. Maurer, B. Robert, R. Rupp, PS. Scheuren, M. Schubert, C. Schuld, C. Sina, B. Steiner, T. Weis, A. Hug, M. Bolliger, N. Weiskopf, P. Freund, T. Hothorn, ME. Schwab, A. Curt, Nogo Inhibition in Spinal Cord Injury Study Group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury results in permanent neurological impairment and disability due to the absence of spontaneous regeneration. NG101, a recombinant human antibody, neutralises the neurite growth-inhibiting protein Nogo-A, promoting neural repair and motor recovery in animal models of spinal cord injury. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal NG101 on recovery in patients with acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b clinical trial was done at 13 hospitals in the Czech Republic, Germany, Spain, and Switzerland. Patients aged 18-70 years with acute, complete or incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (neurological level of injury C1-C8) within 4-28 days of injury were eligible for inclusion. Participants were initially randomly assigned 1:1 to intrathecal treatment with 45 mg NG101 or placebo (phosphate-buffered saline); 18 months into the study, the ratio was adjusted to 3:1 to achieve a final distribution of 2:1 to improve enrolment and drug exposure. Randomisation was done using a centralised, computer-based randomisation system and was stratified according to nine distinct outcome categories with a validated upper extremity motor score (UEMS) prediction model based on clinical parameters at screening. Six intrathecal injections were administered every 5 days over 4 weeks, starting within 28 days of injury. Investigators, study personnel, and study participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was change in UEMS at 6 months, analysed alongside safety in the full analysis set. The completed trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03935321. FINDINGS: From May 20, 2019, to July 20, 2022, 463 patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury were screened, 334 were deemed ineligible and excluded, and 129 were randomly assigned to an intervention (80 patients in the NG101 group and 49 in the placebo group). The full analysis set comprised 78 patients from the NG101 group and 48 patients from the placebo group. 107 (85%) patients were male and 19 (15%) patients were female, with a median age of 51·5 years (IQR 30·0-60·0). Across all patients, the primary endpoint showed no significant difference between groups (with UEMS change at 6 months 1·37 [95% CI -1·44 to 4·18]; placebo group mean 19·20 [SD 11·78] at baseline and 30·91 [SD 15·49] at day 168; NG101 group mean 18·23 [SD 15·14] at baseline and 31·31 [19·54] at day 168). Treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups (nine in the NG101 group and six in the placebo group). 25 severe adverse events were reported: 18 in 11 (14%) patients in the NG101 group and seven in six (13%) patients in the placebo group. Although no treatment-related fatalities were reported in the NG101 group, one fatality not related to treatment occurred in the placebo group. Infections were the most common adverse event affecting 44 (92%) patients in the placebo group and 65 (83%) patients in the NG101 group. INTERPRETATION: NG101 did not improve UEMS in patients with acute spinal cord injury. Post-hoc subgroup analyses assessing UEMS and Spinal Cord Independence Measure of self-care in patients with motor-incomplete injury indicated potential beneficial effects that require investigation in future studies. FUNDING: EU program Horizon2020; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation; Wings for Life; the Swiss Paraplegic Foundation; and the CeNeReg project of Wyss Zurich (University of Zurich and Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a poranění míchy $x farmakoterapie $7 D013119
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a Nogo proteiny $7 D000070798
650    12
$a spinální injekce $7 D007278
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a krční mícha $x zranění $7 D066193
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a krční obratle $7 D002574
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Abel, Rainer $u Clinic for Paraplegia, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany
700    1_
$a Maier, Doris $u Spinal Cord Injuries, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau, Germany
700    1_
$a Röhl, Klaus $u BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Zentrum für Rückenmarkverletzte und Klinik für Orthopädie, Halle, Germany
700    1_
$a Röhrich, Frank $u BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle gGmbH, Zentrum für Rückenmarkverletzte und Klinik für Orthopädie, Halle, Germany
700    1_
$a Baumberger, Michael $u Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Hund-Georgiadis, Margret $u Clinic of Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, REHAB Basel, Basel, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Saur, Marion $u Orthopädische Klinik, Hessisch Lichtenau, Germany
700    1_
$a Benito, Jesús $u Fundacio Institut d'Investigacio en Ciencies de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Rehahn, Kerstin $u Treatment Centre for Spinal Cord Injuries, Trauma Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Aach, Mirko $u Department of Spinal Cord Injuries, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
700    1_
$a Badke, Andreas $u BG Clinic Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
700    1_
$a Kriz, Jiri $u Spinal Cord Unit, Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Barkovits, Katalin $u Medical Proteome Analysis, Center for Proteindiagnostics (PRODI), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
700    1_
$a Killeen, Tim $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Farner, Lynn $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Seif, Maryam $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Hubli, Michèle $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Marcus, Katrin $u Medical Proteome Analysis, Center for Proteindiagnostics (PRODI), Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
700    1_
$a Maurer, Michael A $u Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Robert, Bérénice $u Clinical Study Coordination Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Rupp, Rüdiger $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Scheuren, Paulina S $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
700    1_
$a Schubert, Martin $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Schuld, Christian $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Sina, Christina $u Wyss Zurich Translational Center, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Steiner, Bettina $u Wyss Zurich Translational Center, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Weis, Tanja $u Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumonology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Hug, Andreas $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Bolliger, Marc $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Weiskopf, Nikolaus $u Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Felix Bloch Institute for Solid State Physics, Faculty of Physics and Earth Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Freund, Patrick $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
700    1_
$a Hothorn, Torsten $u Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Schwab, Martin E $u Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Wyss Zurich Translational Center, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Curt, Armin $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
710    2_
$a Nogo Inhibition in Spinal Cord Injury Study Group
773    0_
$w MED00006921 $t Lancet neurology $x 1474-4465 $g Roč. 24, č. 1 (2025), s. 42-53
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39706632 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206103908 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2262942 $s 1238855
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 24 $c 1 $d 42-53 $e - $i 1474-4465 $m Lancet neurology $n Lancet Neurol $x MED00006921
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...