• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Refining Treatment Planning in STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation: Benchmark Results and Consensus Statement From the STOPSTORM.eu Consortium

V. Trojani, M. Grehn, A. Botti, B. Balgobind, A. Savini, J. Boda-Heggemann, M. Miszczyk, O. Elicin, D. Krug, N. Andratschke, D. Schmidhalter, W. van Elmpt, M. Bogowicz, J. de Areba Iglesias, L. Dolla, S. Ehrbar, E. Fernandez-Velilla, J....

. 2025 ; 121 (1) : 218-229. [pub] 20240808

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25002937

PURPOSE: STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) showed promising results in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, clinical data are scarce and heterogeneous. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonize STAR in Europe. The primary goal of this benchmark study was to investigate current treatment planning practice within the STOPSTORM project as a baseline for future harmonization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping extracardiac organs-at-risk and/or cardiac substructures were generated for 3 STAR cases. Participating centers were asked to create single-fraction treatment plans with 25 Gy dose prescriptions based on in-house clinical practice. All treatment plans were reviewed by an expert panel and quantitative crowd knowledge-based analysis was performed with independent software using descriptive statistics for International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report 91 relevant parameters and crowd dose-volume histograms. Thereafter, treatment planning consensus statements were established using a dual-stage voting process. RESULTS: Twenty centers submitted 67 treatment plans for this study. In most plans (75%) intensity modulated arc therapy with 6 MV flattening filter free beams was used. Dose prescription was mainly based on PTV D95% (49%) or D96%-100% (19%). Many participants preferred to spare close extracardiac organs-at-risk (75%) and cardiac substructures (50%) by PTV coverage reduction. PTV D0.035cm3 ranged from 25.5 to 34.6 Gy, demonstrating a large variety of dose inhomogeneity. Estimated treatment times without motion compensation or setup ranged from 2 to 80 minutes. For the consensus statements, a strong agreement was reached for beam technique planning, dose calculation, prescription methods, and trade-offs between target and extracardiac critical structures. No agreement was reached on cardiac substructure dose limitations and on desired dose inhomogeneity in the target. CONCLUSIONS: This STOPSTORM multicenter treatment planning benchmark study not only showed strong agreement on several aspects of STAR treatment planning, but also revealed disagreement on others. To standardize and harmonize STAR in the future, consensus statements were established; however, clinical data are urgently needed for actionable guidelines for treatment planning.

3rd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department Maria Skłodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Poland

Collegium Medicum Faculty of Medicine WSB University Dąbrowa Górnicza Poland

Department for Radiation Oncology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology Department IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital Negrar Verona Italy

Department of Electrical Engineering and Department of Applied Physics Technical University Eindhoven The Netherlands

Department of Medical Physics AUSL IRCCS Reggio Emilia Reggio Emilia Italy

Department of Medical Physics G Mazzini Hospital Teramo Italy

Department of Medical Physics Hospital Clínico San Carlos IdISSC Madrid Spain

Department of Oncology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

Department of Oncology University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Radiation Oncology Amsterdam UMC Radiation Oncology Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Department of Radiation Oncology Catharina Hospital Eindhoven The Netherlands

Department of Radiation Oncology GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands

Department of Radiation Oncology Hospital General Valencia Valencia Spain

Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Mannheim Medical Faculty Mannheim University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany

Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center of Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany

Department of Radiophysics Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland

Department of Radiotherapy Hospital del Mar Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona Spain

Department of Radiotherapy University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

Heart and Vessel Department Service of Cardiology Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

Medical Physics Unit A O U Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Torino Italy

Radiation Oncology Clinical Department National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy Pavia Italy

Radiotherapy Planning Department Maria Skłodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology Gliwice Poland

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25002937
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206103947.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2331 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39122095
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Trojani, Valeria $u Department of Medical Physics, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
245    10
$a Refining Treatment Planning in STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation: Benchmark Results and Consensus Statement From the STOPSTORM.eu Consortium / $c V. Trojani, M. Grehn, A. Botti, B. Balgobind, A. Savini, J. Boda-Heggemann, M. Miszczyk, O. Elicin, D. Krug, N. Andratschke, D. Schmidhalter, W. van Elmpt, M. Bogowicz, J. de Areba Iglesias, L. Dolla, S. Ehrbar, E. Fernandez-Velilla, J. Fleckenstein, D. Granero, D. Henzen, C. Hurkmans, A. Kluge, L. Knybel, S. Loopeker, A. Mirandola, V. Richetto, G. Sicignano, V. Vallet, B. van Asselen, E. Worm, E. Pruvot, J. Verhoeff, M. Fast, M. Iori, O. Blanck
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) showed promising results in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, clinical data are scarce and heterogeneous. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonize STAR in Europe. The primary goal of this benchmark study was to investigate current treatment planning practice within the STOPSTORM project as a baseline for future harmonization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping extracardiac organs-at-risk and/or cardiac substructures were generated for 3 STAR cases. Participating centers were asked to create single-fraction treatment plans with 25 Gy dose prescriptions based on in-house clinical practice. All treatment plans were reviewed by an expert panel and quantitative crowd knowledge-based analysis was performed with independent software using descriptive statistics for International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report 91 relevant parameters and crowd dose-volume histograms. Thereafter, treatment planning consensus statements were established using a dual-stage voting process. RESULTS: Twenty centers submitted 67 treatment plans for this study. In most plans (75%) intensity modulated arc therapy with 6 MV flattening filter free beams was used. Dose prescription was mainly based on PTV D95% (49%) or D96%-100% (19%). Many participants preferred to spare close extracardiac organs-at-risk (75%) and cardiac substructures (50%) by PTV coverage reduction. PTV D0.035cm3 ranged from 25.5 to 34.6 Gy, demonstrating a large variety of dose inhomogeneity. Estimated treatment times without motion compensation or setup ranged from 2 to 80 minutes. For the consensus statements, a strong agreement was reached for beam technique planning, dose calculation, prescription methods, and trade-offs between target and extracardiac critical structures. No agreement was reached on cardiac substructure dose limitations and on desired dose inhomogeneity in the target. CONCLUSIONS: This STOPSTORM multicenter treatment planning benchmark study not only showed strong agreement on several aspects of STAR treatment planning, but also revealed disagreement on others. To standardize and harmonize STAR in the future, consensus statements were established; however, clinical data are urgently needed for actionable guidelines for treatment planning.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a benchmarking $7 D019985
650    12
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x normy $x metody $7 D011880
650    12
$a kritické orgány $x účinky záření $7 D058958
650    12
$a radiochirurgie $x normy $x metody $7 D016634
650    12
$a konsensus $7 D032921
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x metody $x normy $7 D050397
650    _2
$a komorová tachykardie $x chirurgie $x radioterapie $7 D017180
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a srdce $x účinky záření $7 D006321
650    _2
$a srdeční arytmie $7 D001145
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Grehn, Melanie $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
700    1_
$a Botti, Andrea $u Department of Medical Physics, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
700    1_
$a Balgobind, Brian $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Savini, Alessandro $u Department of Medical Physics, G. Mazzini Hospital, Teramo, Italy
700    1_
$a Boda-Heggemann, Judit $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Miszczyk, Marcin $u IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland; Collegium Medicum - Faculty of Medicine, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
700    1_
$a Elicin, Olgun $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Krug, David $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
700    1_
$a Andratschke, Nicolaus $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Schmidhalter, Daniel $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a van Elmpt, Wouter $u Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Bogowicz, Marta $u Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a de Areba Iglesias, Javier $u Department of Medical Physics, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Dolla, Lukasz $u Radiotherapy Planning Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
700    1_
$a Ehrbar, Stefanie $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Fernandez-Velilla, Enric $u Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Fleckenstein, Jens $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
700    1_
$a Granero, Domingo $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital General Valencia, Valencia, Spain
700    1_
$a Henzen, Dominik $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Hurkmans, Coen $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering and Department of Applied Physics, Technical University Eindhoven, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Kluge, Anne $u Department for Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
700    1_
$a Knybel, Lukas $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Loopeker, Sandy $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Mirandola, Alfredo $u Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy
700    1_
$a Richetto, Veronica $u Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
700    1_
$a Sicignano, Gianluisa $u Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
700    1_
$a Vallet, Veronique $u Department of Radiophysics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
700    1_
$a van Asselen, Bram $u Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Worm, Esben $u Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
700    1_
$a Pruvot, Etienne $u Heart and Vessel Department, Service of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Verhoeff, Joost $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Fast, Martin $u Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Iori, Mauro $u Department of Medical Physics, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
700    1_
$a Blanck, Oliver $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: oliver.blanck@uksh.de
773    0_
$w MED00002371 $t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $x 1879-355X $g Roč. 121, č. 1 (2025), s. 218-229
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39122095 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206103943 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2262996 $s 1238944
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 121 $c 1 $d 218-229 $e 20240808 $i 1879-355X $m International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $n Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys $x MED00002371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...