• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Risk of Metachronous Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteral Stenting in Patients With Bladder Cancer

P. Scilipoti, M. Moschini, M. de Angelis, M. Longoni, L. Afferi, C. Lonati, P. Zaurito, R. Pichler, A. Necchi, F. Montorsi, A. Briganti, A. Mari, W. Krajewski, E. Laukthina, B. Pradere, FD. Giudice, L. Mertens, A. Gallioli, F. Soria, P. Gontero,...

. 2024 ; 22 (6) : 102241. [pub] 20241017

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003172

OBJECTIVE: Sparse data exist on the impact of upper urinary tract (UUT) decompression on the risk of UUT recurrence in patients with bladder cancer (BCa). This study aims to evaluate whether Double J stenting (DJS) can increase the risk of UUT recurrence compared to percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1550 patients with cTa-T3NanyM0 BCa who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) between at 12 tertiary care centers (1990-2020). Patients with complete follow-up, no prior history of UUT cancer, and who required UUT decompression for preoperative hydronephrosis were selected. Hydronephrosis grade was defined according to established scoring systems. UUT recurrence was diagnosed through imaging, urinary cytology, and confirmed by selective cytology and ureteroscopy when possible. Propensity scores were computed to determine overlap weights and balance groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated UUT recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS) before and after weighting. Cox regression analyses before and after weighting were fitted to predict UUT recurrence. RESULTS: Of 524 included patients, 132 (25%) and 392 (75%) patients were managed with DJS and PCN placement, respectively. Patients who received PCN had higher grade (≥ 3) of obstruction (34% vs. 14%) and pT3-4 tumors (70% vs. 36%) than patients with DJS. During a median follow-up of 19 months, 2-years UUT-RFS did not differ between groups (95% for PCN vs 92% for DJS, weighted HR 1.41, 95% CI, 0.55-3.59). There was no difference in 2-years weighted CSS (74% vs. 74%) and OS (67% vs 69%). Main limitations were the short follow-up and inclusion of patients uniquely undergoing RC. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ureteral DJS does not increase the risk of developing UUT recurrence in BCa patients with hydronephrosis requiring UUT decompression. However, UUT recurrence was rare, and associations were weak, with findings susceptible to bias. Randomized trials are needed to validate these results.

Clinica Luganese Moncucco Lugano Switzerland

Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences Sapienza University Umberto 1 Polyclinic Hospital Rome Italy

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology Wrocław Medical University Wroclaw Poland

Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna General Hospital Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland

Department of Urology Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

Department of Urology Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology Puigvert Foundation Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Spedali Civili Hospital University of Brescia Brescia Italy

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX

Department of Urology University of Tor Vergata Rome Italy

Department of Urology UROSUD La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY

Division of Experimental Oncology Unit of Urology Urological Research Institute IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Milan Italy

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences Torino School of Medicine Turin Italy

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Sant'Anna Clinic Swiss Medical Group Sorengo Switzerland

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003172
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104102.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102241 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39509743
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Scilipoti, Pietro $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
245    10
$a Risk of Metachronous Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma After Ureteral Stenting in Patients With Bladder Cancer / $c P. Scilipoti, M. Moschini, M. de Angelis, M. Longoni, L. Afferi, C. Lonati, P. Zaurito, R. Pichler, A. Necchi, F. Montorsi, A. Briganti, A. Mari, W. Krajewski, E. Laukthina, B. Pradere, FD. Giudice, L. Mertens, A. Gallioli, F. Soria, P. Gontero, S. Albisinni, SF. Shariat, R. Carando, European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urothelial carcinoma working group
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Sparse data exist on the impact of upper urinary tract (UUT) decompression on the risk of UUT recurrence in patients with bladder cancer (BCa). This study aims to evaluate whether Double J stenting (DJS) can increase the risk of UUT recurrence compared to percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1550 patients with cTa-T3NanyM0 BCa who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) between at 12 tertiary care centers (1990-2020). Patients with complete follow-up, no prior history of UUT cancer, and who required UUT decompression for preoperative hydronephrosis were selected. Hydronephrosis grade was defined according to established scoring systems. UUT recurrence was diagnosed through imaging, urinary cytology, and confirmed by selective cytology and ureteroscopy when possible. Propensity scores were computed to determine overlap weights and balance groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated UUT recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS) before and after weighting. Cox regression analyses before and after weighting were fitted to predict UUT recurrence. RESULTS: Of 524 included patients, 132 (25%) and 392 (75%) patients were managed with DJS and PCN placement, respectively. Patients who received PCN had higher grade (≥ 3) of obstruction (34% vs. 14%) and pT3-4 tumors (70% vs. 36%) than patients with DJS. During a median follow-up of 19 months, 2-years UUT-RFS did not differ between groups (95% for PCN vs 92% for DJS, weighted HR 1.41, 95% CI, 0.55-3.59). There was no difference in 2-years weighted CSS (74% vs. 74%) and OS (67% vs 69%). Main limitations were the short follow-up and inclusion of patients uniquely undergoing RC. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ureteral DJS does not increase the risk of developing UUT recurrence in BCa patients with hydronephrosis requiring UUT decompression. However, UUT recurrence was rare, and associations were weak, with findings susceptible to bias. Randomized trials are needed to validate these results.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a stenty $7 D015607
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D001749
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a sekundární malignity $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D016609
650    _2
$a cystektomie $7 D015653
650    _2
$a hydronefróza $x etiologie $7 D006869
650    _2
$a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D002295
650    _2
$a perkutánní nefrostomie $7 D009403
650    _2
$a nádory močovodu $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D014516
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Moschini, Marco $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: moschini.marco@hsr.it
700    1_
$a de Angelis, Mario $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Longoni, Mattia $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Afferi, Luca $u Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Lonati, Chiara $u Department of Urology, Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
700    1_
$a Zaurito, Paolo $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Pichler, Renate $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
700    1_
$a Necchi, Andrea $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Montorsi, Francesco $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Briganti, Alberto $u Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Mari, Andrea $u Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Krajewski, Wojciech $u Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Laukthina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
700    1_
$a Giudice, Francesco Del $u Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Sapienza University, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Mertens, Laura $u Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Gallioli, Andrea $u Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Gontero, Paolo $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Albisinni, Simone $u Department of Urology, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Carando, Roberto $u Clinica Luganese Moncucco, Lugano, Switzerland; Sant'Anna Clinic, Swiss Medical Group, Sorengo, Switzerland
710    2_
$a European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Urothelial carcinoma working group
773    0_
$w MED00188741 $t Clinical genitourinary cancer $x 1938-0682 $g Roč. 22, č. 6 (2024), s. 102241
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39509743 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104057 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263117 $s 1239179
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 22 $c 6 $d 102241 $e 20241017 $i 1938-0682 $m Clinical genitourinary cancer $n Clin Genitourin Cancer $x MED00188741
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...