• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study

J. Werner, O. Klementova, J. Bruthans, J. Macoun, T. Gaszynski, T. Henlin, W. Donaldson, E. Lichnovsky, S. Arava, AM. Lopez, R. Berge, P. Michalek

. 2024 ; 79 (12) : 1284-1291. [pub] 20240807

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003310

Grantová podpora
CZ-DRO-VFN00064165 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

BACKGROUND: The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. METHODS: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. RESULTS: In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003310
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104239.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/anae.16401 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39110995
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Werner, Jakub $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study / $c J. Werner, O. Klementova, J. Bruthans, J. Macoun, T. Gaszynski, T. Henlin, W. Donaldson, E. Lichnovsky, S. Arava, AM. Lopez, R. Berge, P. Michalek
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. METHODS: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. RESULTS: In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a elektivní chirurgické výkony $7 D017558
650    12
$a laryngální masky $7 D017214
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a intratracheální intubace $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D007442
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a zajištění dýchacích cest $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D058109
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a celková anestezie $7 D000768
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Klementova, Olga $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bruthans, Jan $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Macoun, Jaromir $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gaszynski, Tomasz $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
700    1_
$a Henlin, Tomas $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Medicine, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Donaldson, Will $u Department of Anaesthesia, Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, UK
700    1_
$a Lichnovsky, Erik $u Department of Anaesthesia, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, UK
700    1_
$a Arava, Shiva $u Department of Anaesthesia, Craigavon Area Hospital, Portadown, UK
700    1_
$a Lopez, Ana M $u Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Berge, Raquel $u Department of Anaesthesia, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Michalek, Pavel $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, General University Hospital and First Medical Faculty of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000181195927 $7 xx0079908
773    0_
$w MED00009138 $t Anaesthesia $x 1365-2044 $g Roč. 79, č. 12 (2024), s. 1284-1291
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39110995 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104235 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263208 $s 1239317
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 79 $c 12 $d 1284-1291 $e 20240807 $i 1365-2044 $m Anaesthesia $n Anaesthesia $x MED00009138
GRA    __
$a CZ-DRO-VFN00064165 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace