• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Clofarabine Has a Superior Therapeutic Window as compared to Gemcitabine in Preclinical Bladder Cancer Models

M. Gutmann, IE. Ertl, P. Herek, P. Vician, C. Pirker, C. Nössing, R. Brettner, U. Lemberger, R. Grausenburger, K. Batlogg, O. Baumfried, I. Prantl, N. Singh, E. Laukhtina, A. Oszwald, G. Wasinger, E. Compérat, W. Berger, SF. Shariat, B. Englinger

. 2024 ; 7 (6) : 1166-1170. [pub] 20240516

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003337

Current standard-of-care systemic therapy options for locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer (BC), which are predominantly based on cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations, are limited by significant treatment failure rates and frailty-based patient ineligibility. We previously addressed the urgent clinical need for better-tolerated BC therapeutic strategies using a drug screening approach, which identified outstanding antineoplastic activity of clofarabine in preclinical models of BC. To further assess clofarabine as a potential BC therapy component, we conducted head-to-head comparisons of responses to clofarabine versus gemcitabine in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of BC, complemented by in silico analyses. In vitro data suggest a distinct correlation between the two antimetabolites, with higher cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, especially against several nonmalignant cell types, including keratinocytes and endothelial cells. Accordingly, tolerance of clofarabine (oral or intraperitoneal application) was distinctly better than for gemcitabine (intraperitoneal) in patient-derived xenograft models of BC. Clofarabine also exhibited distinctly superior anticancer efficacy, even at dosing regimens optimized for gemcitabine. Neither complete remission nor cure, both of which were observed with clofarabine, were achieved with any tolerable gemcitabine regimen. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that clofarabine has a better therapeutic window than gemcitabine, further emphasizing its potential as a candidate for drug repurposing in BC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the anticancer activity of clofarabine, a drug used for treatment of leukemia but not bladder cancer, and gemcitabine, a drug currently used for chemotherapy against bladder cancer. Using cell cultures and mouse models, we found that clofarabine was better tolerated and more efficacious than gemcitabine, and even cured implanted tumors in mouse models. Our results suggest that clofarabine, alone or in combination schemes, might be superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of bladder cancer.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003337
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104254.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.001 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38755094
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Gutmann, Michael $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
245    10
$a Clofarabine Has a Superior Therapeutic Window as compared to Gemcitabine in Preclinical Bladder Cancer Models / $c M. Gutmann, IE. Ertl, P. Herek, P. Vician, C. Pirker, C. Nössing, R. Brettner, U. Lemberger, R. Grausenburger, K. Batlogg, O. Baumfried, I. Prantl, N. Singh, E. Laukhtina, A. Oszwald, G. Wasinger, E. Compérat, W. Berger, SF. Shariat, B. Englinger
520    9_
$a Current standard-of-care systemic therapy options for locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer (BC), which are predominantly based on cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations, are limited by significant treatment failure rates and frailty-based patient ineligibility. We previously addressed the urgent clinical need for better-tolerated BC therapeutic strategies using a drug screening approach, which identified outstanding antineoplastic activity of clofarabine in preclinical models of BC. To further assess clofarabine as a potential BC therapy component, we conducted head-to-head comparisons of responses to clofarabine versus gemcitabine in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models of BC, complemented by in silico analyses. In vitro data suggest a distinct correlation between the two antimetabolites, with higher cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, especially against several nonmalignant cell types, including keratinocytes and endothelial cells. Accordingly, tolerance of clofarabine (oral or intraperitoneal application) was distinctly better than for gemcitabine (intraperitoneal) in patient-derived xenograft models of BC. Clofarabine also exhibited distinctly superior anticancer efficacy, even at dosing regimens optimized for gemcitabine. Neither complete remission nor cure, both of which were observed with clofarabine, were achieved with any tolerable gemcitabine regimen. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that clofarabine has a better therapeutic window than gemcitabine, further emphasizing its potential as a candidate for drug repurposing in BC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared the anticancer activity of clofarabine, a drug used for treatment of leukemia but not bladder cancer, and gemcitabine, a drug currently used for chemotherapy against bladder cancer. Using cell cultures and mouse models, we found that clofarabine was better tolerated and more efficacious than gemcitabine, and even cured implanted tumors in mouse models. Our results suggest that clofarabine, alone or in combination schemes, might be superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of bladder cancer.
650    12
$a gemcitabin $7 D000093542
650    12
$a deoxycytidin $x analogy a deriváty $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D003841
650    12
$a klofarabin $x terapeutické užití $x farmakologie $7 D000077866
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D001749
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
650    _2
$a xenogenní modely - testy protinádorové aktivity $7 D023041
650    _2
$a protinádorové antimetabolity $x terapeutické užití $x farmakologie $7 D000964
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Ertl, Iris E $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Herek, Paula $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Vician, Petra $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Pirker, Christine $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Nössing, Christoph $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Brettner, Robert $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Lemberger, Ursula $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Grausenburger, Reinhard $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Batlogg, Kai $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Baumfried, Oliver $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Prantl, Isabella $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Singh, Neha $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Oszwald, André $u Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Wasinger, Gabriel $u Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Compérat, Eva $u Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Berger, Walter $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: walter.berger@meduniwien.ac.at
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Englinger, Bernhard $u Center for Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
773    0_
$w MED00205913 $t European urology oncology $x 2588-9311 $g Roč. 7, č. 6 (2024), s. 1166-1170
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38755094 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104250 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263231 $s 1239344
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 7 $c 6 $d 1166-1170 $e 20240516 $i 2588-9311 $m European urology oncology $n Eur Urol Oncol $x MED00205913
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...