• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Data Visualization Preferences in Remote Measurement Technology for Individuals Living With Depression, Epilepsy, and Multiple Sclerosis: Qualitative Study

S. Simblett, E. Dawe-Lane, G. Gilpin, D. Morris, K. White, S. Erturk, J. Devonshire, S. Lees, S. Zormpas, A. Polhemus, G. Temesi, N. Cummins, M. Hotopf, T. Wykes, RADAR-CNS Consortium

. 2024 ; 26 (-) : e43954. [pub] 20241018

Jazyk angličtina Země Kanada

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003845

BACKGROUND: Remote measurement technology (RMT) involves the use of wearable devices and smartphone apps to measure health outcomes in everyday life. RMT with feedback in the form of data visual representations can facilitate self-management of chronic health conditions, promote health care engagement, and present opportunities for intervention. Studies to date focus broadly on multiple dimensions of service users' design preferences and RMT user experiences (eg, health variables of perceived importance and perceived quality of medical advice provided) as opposed to data visualization preferences. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore data visualization preferences and priorities in RMT, with individuals living with depression, those with epilepsy, and those with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A triangulated qualitative study comparing and thematically synthesizing focus group discussions with user reviews of existing self-management apps and a systematic review of RMT data visualization preferences. A total of 45 people participated in 6 focus groups across the 3 health conditions (depression, n=17; epilepsy, n=11; and MS, n=17). RESULTS: Thematic analysis validated a major theme around design preferences and recommendations and identified a further four minor themes: (1) data reporting, (2) impact of visualization, (3) moderators of visualization preferences, and (4) system-related factors and features. CONCLUSIONS: When used effectively, data visualizations are valuable, engaging components of RMT. Easy to use and intuitive data visualization design was lauded by individuals with neurological and psychiatric conditions. Apps design needs to consider the unique requirements of service users. Overall, this study offers RMT developers a comprehensive outline of the data visualization preferences of individuals living with depression, epilepsy, and MS.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003845
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206104734.0
007      
ta
008      
250121e20241018xxc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2196/43954 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39423366
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxc
100    1_
$a Simblett, Sara $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000280758238
245    10
$a Data Visualization Preferences in Remote Measurement Technology for Individuals Living With Depression, Epilepsy, and Multiple Sclerosis: Qualitative Study / $c S. Simblett, E. Dawe-Lane, G. Gilpin, D. Morris, K. White, S. Erturk, J. Devonshire, S. Lees, S. Zormpas, A. Polhemus, G. Temesi, N. Cummins, M. Hotopf, T. Wykes, RADAR-CNS Consortium
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Remote measurement technology (RMT) involves the use of wearable devices and smartphone apps to measure health outcomes in everyday life. RMT with feedback in the form of data visual representations can facilitate self-management of chronic health conditions, promote health care engagement, and present opportunities for intervention. Studies to date focus broadly on multiple dimensions of service users' design preferences and RMT user experiences (eg, health variables of perceived importance and perceived quality of medical advice provided) as opposed to data visualization preferences. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore data visualization preferences and priorities in RMT, with individuals living with depression, those with epilepsy, and those with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A triangulated qualitative study comparing and thematically synthesizing focus group discussions with user reviews of existing self-management apps and a systematic review of RMT data visualization preferences. A total of 45 people participated in 6 focus groups across the 3 health conditions (depression, n=17; epilepsy, n=11; and MS, n=17). RESULTS: Thematic analysis validated a major theme around design preferences and recommendations and identified a further four minor themes: (1) data reporting, (2) impact of visualization, (3) moderators of visualization preferences, and (4) system-related factors and features. CONCLUSIONS: When used effectively, data visualizations are valuable, engaging components of RMT. Easy to use and intuitive data visualization design was lauded by individuals with neurological and psychiatric conditions. Apps design needs to consider the unique requirements of service users. Overall, this study offers RMT developers a comprehensive outline of the data visualization preferences of individuals living with depression, epilepsy, and MS.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a roztroušená skleróza $x psychologie $7 D009103
650    12
$a epilepsie $x psychologie $7 D004827
650    12
$a kvalitativní výzkum $7 D036301
650    12
$a deprese $x psychologie $7 D003863
650    12
$a zjišťování skupinových postojů $7 D017144
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mobilní aplikace $7 D063731
650    _2
$a vizualizace dat $7 D000078326
650    _2
$a pacientova volba $x psychologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D057240
650    _2
$a telemedicína $7 D017216
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a nositelná elektronika $7 D000076251
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dawe-Lane, Erin $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000284796696
700    1_
$a Gilpin, Gina $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000294417979
700    1_
$a Morris, Daniel $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000151187344
700    1_
$a White, Katie $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000209250175
700    1_
$a Erturk, Sinan $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000287891250
700    1_
$a Devonshire, Julie $u Remote Assessment of Disease And Relapse - Central Nervous System Patient Advisory Board, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000342188323
700    1_
$a Lees, Simon $u Remote Assessment of Disease And Relapse - Central Nervous System Patient Advisory Board, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000151407394
700    1_
$a Zormpas, Spyridon $u Remote Assessment of Disease And Relapse - Central Nervous System Patient Advisory Board, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0009000789640117
700    1_
$a Polhemus, Ashley $u Medical Science Division IT Services, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000250565785
700    1_
$a Temesi, Gergely $u Medical Science Division IT Services, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000234232200
700    1_
$a Cummins, Nicholas $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/000000021178917X
700    1_
$a Hotopf, Matthew $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $u South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000239804466
700    1_
$a Wykes, Til $u Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom $u South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/0000000258818003
710    2_
$a RADAR-CNS Consortium
773    0_
$w MED00007388 $t JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $x 1438-8871 $g Roč. 26 (20241018), s. e43954
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39423366 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206104729 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263544 $s 1239852
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 26 $c - $d e43954 $e 20241018 $i 1438-8871 $m JMIR. Journal of medical internet research $n J Med Internet Res $x MED00007388
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace