Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods

I. Cibulková, V. Řehořová, M. Wilhelm, H. Soukupová, J. Hajer, F. Duška, H. Daňková, M. Cahová

. 2024 ; 38 (19-20) : e25105. [pub] 20241003

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25003984

Grantová podpora
IN 00023001 Institute for Clinical and Experimental medicine - IKEM
Institutional Support of FNKV University Hospital
VAT No 0907206 Donatio Intensivistam Endowement fund
Cooperation Intensive Care Medicine Programme of Charles University

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a developing therapy for disorders related to gut dysbiosis. Despite its growing application, standardised protocols for FMT filtrate preparation and quality assessment remain undeveloped. The viability of bacteria in the filtrate is crucial for FMT's efficacy and for validating protocol execution. We compared two methods-in vitro cultivation and membrane integrity assessment-for their accuracy, reproducibility and clinical applicability in measuring bacterial viability in frozen FMT stool filtrate. METHODS: Bacterial viability in stool filtrate was evaluated using (i) membrane integrity through fluorescent DNA staining with SYTO9 and propidium iodide, followed by flow cytometry and (ii) culturable bacteria counts (colony-forming units, CFU) under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. RESULTS: Using different types of samples (pure bacterial culture, stool of germ-free and conventionally bred mice, native and heat-treated human stool), we refined the bacterial DNA staining protocol integrated with flow cytometry for assessment of bacterial viability in frozen human stool samples. Both the membrane integrity-based and cultivation-based methods exhibited significant variability in bacterial viability across different FMT filtrates, without correlation. The cultivation-based method showed a mean coefficient of variance of 30.3%, ranging from 7.4% to 60.1%. Conversely, the membrane integrity approach yielded more reproducible results, with a mean coefficient of variance for viable cells of 6.4% ranging from 0.2% to 18.2%. CONCLUSION: Bacterial viability assessment in stool filtrate using the membrane integrity method offers robust and precise data, making it a suitable option for faecal material evaluation in FMT. In contrast, the cultivation-dependent methods produce inconsistent outcomes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25003984
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206105023.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jcla.25105 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39360586
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Cibulková, Ivana $u Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods / $c I. Cibulková, V. Řehořová, M. Wilhelm, H. Soukupová, J. Hajer, F. Duška, H. Daňková, M. Cahová
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a developing therapy for disorders related to gut dysbiosis. Despite its growing application, standardised protocols for FMT filtrate preparation and quality assessment remain undeveloped. The viability of bacteria in the filtrate is crucial for FMT's efficacy and for validating protocol execution. We compared two methods-in vitro cultivation and membrane integrity assessment-for their accuracy, reproducibility and clinical applicability in measuring bacterial viability in frozen FMT stool filtrate. METHODS: Bacterial viability in stool filtrate was evaluated using (i) membrane integrity through fluorescent DNA staining with SYTO9 and propidium iodide, followed by flow cytometry and (ii) culturable bacteria counts (colony-forming units, CFU) under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. RESULTS: Using different types of samples (pure bacterial culture, stool of germ-free and conventionally bred mice, native and heat-treated human stool), we refined the bacterial DNA staining protocol integrated with flow cytometry for assessment of bacterial viability in frozen human stool samples. Both the membrane integrity-based and cultivation-based methods exhibited significant variability in bacterial viability across different FMT filtrates, without correlation. The cultivation-based method showed a mean coefficient of variance of 30.3%, ranging from 7.4% to 60.1%. Conversely, the membrane integrity approach yielded more reproducible results, with a mean coefficient of variance for viable cells of 6.4% ranging from 0.2% to 18.2%. CONCLUSION: Bacterial viability assessment in stool filtrate using the membrane integrity method offers robust and precise data, making it a suitable option for faecal material evaluation in FMT. In contrast, the cultivation-dependent methods produce inconsistent outcomes.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a mikrobiální viabilita $7 D050296
650    12
$a feces $x mikrobiologie $7 D005243
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a fekální transplantace $x metody $7 D000069467
650    12
$a průtoková cytometrie $x metody $7 D005434
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Řehořová, Veronika $u The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Wilhelm, Marek $u The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Soukupová, Hana $u The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Microbiology, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hajer, Jan $u Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Duška, František $u The Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000315594078 $7 mzk2007386027
700    1_
$a Daňková, Helena $u Department of Experimental Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cahová, Monika $u Department of Experimental Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000326405084 $7 xx0070633
773    0_
$w MED00009990 $t Journal of clinical laboratory analysis $x 1098-2825 $g Roč. 38, č. 19-20 (2024), s. e25105
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39360586 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206105018 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263619 $s 1239991
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 38 $c 19-20 $d e25105 $e 20241003 $i 1098-2825 $m Journal of clinical laboratory analysis $n J Clin Lab Anal $x MED00009990
GRA    __
$a IN 00023001 $p Institute for Clinical and Experimental medicine - IKEM
GRA    __
$p Institutional Support of FNKV University Hospital
GRA    __
$a VAT No 0907206 $p Donatio Intensivistam Endowement fund
GRA    __
$p Cooperation Intensive Care Medicine Programme of Charles University
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace