• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Laser Therapy in Hypertrophic and Keloid Scars: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

JA. Foppiani, A. Khaity, NM. Al-Dardery, MT. Hasan, M. El-Samahy, D. Lee, OA. Abdelwahab, AE. Abd-Alwahed, HM. Khitti, K. Albakri, SJ. Lin

. 2024 ; 48 (19) : 3988-4006. [pub] 20240517

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25004077
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2002-11-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2002-11-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance and symptoms associated with hypertrophic and keloid scars. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different laser types in treating hypertrophic and keloid scars. METHODS: A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up until July 2023. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data in a network meta-analysis (NMA) model, using R software. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies, comprising 550 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooling our data showed that fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was superior to control in terms of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), pliability score, and thickness; [MD = - 5.97; 95% CI (- 7.30; - 4.65)], [MD = - 2.68; 95% CI (- 4.03; - 1.33)], [MD = - 2.22; 95% CI (- 3.13; - 1.31)], respectively. However, insignificant difference was observed among FCO2 plus 5-FU compared to control group in terms of erythema, vascularity, redness and perfusion, and pigmentation [MD = - 0.71; 95% CI (- 2.72; 1.30)], [MD = - 0.44; 95% CI (- 1.26; 0.38)], respectively. CONCLUSION: Our NMA found that the FCO2 plus 5-FU was the most effective intervention in decreasing the VSS and thickness, while FCO2 plus CO2 was the most effective intervention in decreasing the pliability score. Further research is needed to determine the optimal laser parameters and long-term efficacy of laser therapy in hypertrophic and keloid scars. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25004077
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206105120.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00266-024-04027-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38760539
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Foppiani, Jose A $u Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, USA $u 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Laser Therapy in Hypertrophic and Keloid Scars: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis / $c JA. Foppiani, A. Khaity, NM. Al-Dardery, MT. Hasan, M. El-Samahy, D. Lee, OA. Abdelwahab, AE. Abd-Alwahed, HM. Khitti, K. Albakri, SJ. Lin
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Laser therapy has emerged as a promising treatment modality for improving the appearance and symptoms associated with hypertrophic and keloid scars. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different laser types in treating hypertrophic and keloid scars. METHODS: A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published up until July 2023. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data in a network meta-analysis (NMA) model, using R software. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies, comprising 550 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooling our data showed that fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was superior to control in terms of Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), pliability score, and thickness; [MD = - 5.97; 95% CI (- 7.30; - 4.65)], [MD = - 2.68; 95% CI (- 4.03; - 1.33)], [MD = - 2.22; 95% CI (- 3.13; - 1.31)], respectively. However, insignificant difference was observed among FCO2 plus 5-FU compared to control group in terms of erythema, vascularity, redness and perfusion, and pigmentation [MD = - 0.71; 95% CI (- 2.72; 1.30)], [MD = - 0.44; 95% CI (- 1.26; 0.38)], respectively. CONCLUSION: Our NMA found that the FCO2 plus 5-FU was the most effective intervention in decreasing the VSS and thickness, while FCO2 plus CO2 was the most effective intervention in decreasing the pliability score. Further research is needed to determine the optimal laser parameters and long-term efficacy of laser therapy in hypertrophic and keloid scars. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a jizva hypertrofická $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D017439
650    12
$a keloid $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D007627
650    _2
$a laserová terapie $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D053685
650    _2
$a síťová metaanalýza $7 D000071076
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Khaity, Abdulrhman $u Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan
700    1_
$a Al-Dardery, Nada Mostafa $u Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
700    1_
$a Hasan, Mohammed Tarek $u Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
700    1_
$a El-Samahy, Mohamed $u Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
700    1_
$a Lee, Daniela $u Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, USA
700    1_
$a Abdelwahab, Omar A $u Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
700    1_
$a Abd-Alwahed, Aya Ehab $u Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
700    1_
$a Khitti, Huzifa Marwan $u Faculty of Dentistry, Sinai University, Sinai, Egypt
700    1_
$a Albakri, Khaled $u Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
700    1_
$a Lin, Samuel J $u Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 110 Francis Street Suite 5A, Boston, USA. samjlin@hotmail.com
773    0_
$w MED00005691 $t Aesthetic plastic surgery $x 1432-5241 $g Roč. 48, č. 19 (2024), s. 3988-4006
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38760539 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206105116 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263684 $s 1240084
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 48 $c 19 $d 3988-4006 $e 20240517 $i 1432-5241 $m Aesthetic plastic surgery $n Aesthetic Plast Surg $x MED00005691
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...