• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Performance and safety of PowerPICC catheters and accessories: a prospective observational study

M. Troubil, G. Capozzoli, B. Mussa, M. Hodne, K. Hoerauf, K. Alsbrooks

. 2024 ; 14 (9) : e081288. [pub] 20240930

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25004106

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of PowerPICC catheters in a real-world setting. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, multicentre study. SETTING: Nine European countries, involving 14 centres. PARTICIPANTS: General patient population. INTERVENTION: PowerPICC catheter inserted by the clinician as standard of care with routinely collected outcomes followed through device removal or 180 days postinsertion. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Safety and performance outcomes were assessed for PowerPICC, PowerPICC SOLO 2 and PowerGroshong PICC. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis (VT), and secondary safety endpoints included phlebitis, extravasation, vessel laceration, vessel perforation local infection, accidental dislodgment and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The primary performance endpoint was the percentage of patients whose PowerPICC device remained in place through the completion of therapy. The secondary performance endpoints included catheter patency, placement success in a single attempt and usability. RESULTS: The enrolled patients (N=451) received either PowerPICC, PowerPICC SOLO 2 or PowerGroshong PICC catheters. Across all devices, 1.6% of patients developed symptomatic VT, and CRBSI occurred in 1.6% of patients. There were no cases of phlebitis or extravasation and only three cases of vein laceration or vein perforation. The catheters showed high success rates in completing therapy (81.8%), maintaining patency (93.9%) and achieving successful placement in a single attempt (90.4%). Clinicians overwhelmingly agreed that both the guidewire and stylet (93.3% and 94.4%, respectively) were easy or very easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and performance of PowerPICC catheters across diverse settings and patient cohorts in real-world hospital settings across Europe. The findings indicate that these catheters are safe and can be effectively used in the general patient setting and when inserted by a variety of clinicians. The low incidence of complications and high success rates further support the clinical utility of these catheters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04263649.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25004106
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250206105131.0
007      
ta
008      
250121s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081288 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39349374
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Troubil, Martin $u University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Performance and safety of PowerPICC catheters and accessories: a prospective observational study / $c M. Troubil, G. Capozzoli, B. Mussa, M. Hodne, K. Hoerauf, K. Alsbrooks
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of PowerPICC catheters in a real-world setting. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, multicentre study. SETTING: Nine European countries, involving 14 centres. PARTICIPANTS: General patient population. INTERVENTION: PowerPICC catheter inserted by the clinician as standard of care with routinely collected outcomes followed through device removal or 180 days postinsertion. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Safety and performance outcomes were assessed for PowerPICC, PowerPICC SOLO 2 and PowerGroshong PICC. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis (VT), and secondary safety endpoints included phlebitis, extravasation, vessel laceration, vessel perforation local infection, accidental dislodgment and catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The primary performance endpoint was the percentage of patients whose PowerPICC device remained in place through the completion of therapy. The secondary performance endpoints included catheter patency, placement success in a single attempt and usability. RESULTS: The enrolled patients (N=451) received either PowerPICC, PowerPICC SOLO 2 or PowerGroshong PICC catheters. Across all devices, 1.6% of patients developed symptomatic VT, and CRBSI occurred in 1.6% of patients. There were no cases of phlebitis or extravasation and only three cases of vein laceration or vein perforation. The catheters showed high success rates in completing therapy (81.8%), maintaining patency (93.9%) and achieving successful placement in a single attempt (90.4%). Clinicians overwhelmingly agreed that both the guidewire and stylet (93.3% and 94.4%, respectively) were easy or very easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the safety and performance of PowerPICC catheters across diverse settings and patient cohorts in real-world hospital settings across Europe. The findings indicate that these catheters are safe and can be effectively used in the general patient setting and when inserted by a variety of clinicians. The low incidence of complications and high success rates further support the clinical utility of these catheters. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04263649.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a katétrové infekce $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D055499
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a periferní katetrizace $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D002406
650    _2
$a katetrizace centrálních vén $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D002405
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a žilní trombóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D020246
650    _2
$a centrální žilní katétry $x škodlivé účinky $7 D062905
650    _2
$a zaváděcí katétry $x škodlivé účinky $7 D002408
650    _2
$a flebitida $x etiologie $x epidemiologie $7 D010689
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Capozzoli, Giuseppe $u Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
700    1_
$a Mussa, Baudolino $u Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Hodne, Melinda $u Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA
700    1_
$a Hoerauf, Klaus $u Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA $u Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000166007190
700    1_
$a Alsbrooks, Kimberly $u Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA kim.alsbrooks@bd.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000286847100
773    0_
$w MED00184484 $t BMJ open $x 2044-6055 $g Roč. 14, č. 9 (2024), s. e081288
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39349374 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250121 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250206105127 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2263699 $s 1240113
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 14 $c 9 $d e081288 $e 20240930 $i 2044-6055 $m BMJ open $n BMJ Open $x MED00184484
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250121

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...