-
Something wrong with this record ?
Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
B. Tekdogan, J. Martineau, M. Verbat, ETC. Dong, D. Correia, CM. Oranges
Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2012
PubMed Central
from 2012
Europe PubMed Central
from 2012
ProQuest Central
from 2019-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2019-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2012
PubMed
40004590
DOI
10.3390/jcm14041056
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Background/Objectives: The DIEP flap is among the preferred techniques in autologous breast reconstruction due to better long-term outcomes, including higher satisfaction and more natural breast shape compared to implant-based breast reconstruction. With the rise in genetic testing, bilateral DIEP reconstructions are becoming more common, though they carry a higher risk of complications. This study aims to compare the risks between unilateral and bilateral procedures to improve surgical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on female patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and May 2024. The study included patients with complete medical records and follow-up data, excluding those with incomplete records. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complications were thoroughly analyzed, with donor site complications assessed per patient and recipient site complications per breast. Results: During the study, 141 DIEP flaps were performed on 114 women, with 87 unilateral and 27 bilateral reconstructions. Age and BMI were similar between groups. However, chemotherapy was more common in the bilateral group (85% vs. 47%, p = 0.0011). Operative time was significantly longer in bilateral procedures (650 vs. 460 min, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in recipient and donor site complications across groups. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the bilateral group (11 vs. 8.8 days, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Bilateral and unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions have similar complication and early take-back rates.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25008452
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250422095716.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250408s2025 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jcm14041056 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40004590
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Tekdogan, Boran $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0009000690331728
- 245 10
- $a Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes in Unilateral Versus Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstructions: A Single-Center Retrospective Study / $c B. Tekdogan, J. Martineau, M. Verbat, ETC. Dong, D. Correia, CM. Oranges
- 520 9_
- $a Background/Objectives: The DIEP flap is among the preferred techniques in autologous breast reconstruction due to better long-term outcomes, including higher satisfaction and more natural breast shape compared to implant-based breast reconstruction. With the rise in genetic testing, bilateral DIEP reconstructions are becoming more common, though they carry a higher risk of complications. This study aims to compare the risks between unilateral and bilateral procedures to improve surgical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on female patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and May 2024. The study included patients with complete medical records and follow-up data, excluding those with incomplete records. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complications were thoroughly analyzed, with donor site complications assessed per patient and recipient site complications per breast. Results: During the study, 141 DIEP flaps were performed on 114 women, with 87 unilateral and 27 bilateral reconstructions. Age and BMI were similar between groups. However, chemotherapy was more common in the bilateral group (85% vs. 47%, p = 0.0011). Operative time was significantly longer in bilateral procedures (650 vs. 460 min, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in recipient and donor site complications across groups. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the bilateral group (11 vs. 8.8 days, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Bilateral and unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions have similar complication and early take-back rates.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Martineau, Jérôme $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Verbat, Miroslava $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 1660/32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dong, Edward T C $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Correia, Daniel $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0009000614806648
- 700 1_
- $a Oranges, Carlo M $u Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000317355329
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195462 $t Journal of clinical medicine $x 2077-0383 $g Roč. 14, č. 4 (2025)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40004590 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250422095717 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2306378 $s 1245527
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 14 $c 4 $e 20250207 $i 2077-0383 $m Journal of clinical medicine $n J Clin Med $x MED00195462
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250408