Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Examining the learning curves in robotic cardiac surgery wet lab simulation training

GV. Atroshchenko, E. Navarra, M. Valdis, E. Sandoval, N. Hashemi, S. Cerny, D. Pereda, M. Palmen, F. Bjerrum, NH. Bruun, MG. Tolsgaard

. 2024 ; 40 (1) : . [pub] 20241225

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25008774

Grantová podpora
Biomedical Research Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training has gained distinction in cardiothoracic surgery as robotic-assisted cardiac procedures evolve. Despite the increasing use of wet lab simulators, the effectiveness of these training methods and skill acquisition rates remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare learning curves and assess the robotic cardiac surgical skill acquisition rate for cardiac and noncardiac surgeons who had no robotic experience in a wet lab simulation setting. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, participants practiced 3 robotic tasks in a porcine model: left atriotomy closure, internal thoracic artery harvesting and mitral annular suturing. Participants were novice robotic cardiac and noncardiac surgeons alongside experienced robotic cardiac surgeons who established performance benchmarks. Performance was evaluated using the time-based score and modified global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (mGEARS). RESULTS: The participants were 15 novice surgeons (7 cardiac; 8 noncardiac) and 4 experienced robotic surgeons. Most novices reached mastery in 52 (±22) min for atrial closure, 32 (±18) for internal thoracic artery harvesting and 34 (±12) for mitral stitches, with no significant differences between the cardiac and noncardiac surgeons. However, for mGEARS, noncardiac novices faced more challenges in internal thoracic artery harvesting. The Thurstone learning curve model indicated no significant difference in the learning rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wet lab simulation facilitates the rapid acquisition of robotic cardiac surgical skills to expert levels, irrespective of surgeons' experience in open cardiac surgery. These findings support the use of wet lab simulators for standardized, competency-based training in robotic cardiac surgery.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008774
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250422095829.0
007      
ta
008      
250408s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/icvts/ivae227 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39786456
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Atroshchenko, Gennady V $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark $u ROCnord Robotic Center Aalborg, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark $1 https://orcid.org/0009000453262167
245    10
$a Examining the learning curves in robotic cardiac surgery wet lab simulation training / $c GV. Atroshchenko, E. Navarra, M. Valdis, E. Sandoval, N. Hashemi, S. Cerny, D. Pereda, M. Palmen, F. Bjerrum, NH. Bruun, MG. Tolsgaard
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training has gained distinction in cardiothoracic surgery as robotic-assisted cardiac procedures evolve. Despite the increasing use of wet lab simulators, the effectiveness of these training methods and skill acquisition rates remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare learning curves and assess the robotic cardiac surgical skill acquisition rate for cardiac and noncardiac surgeons who had no robotic experience in a wet lab simulation setting. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, participants practiced 3 robotic tasks in a porcine model: left atriotomy closure, internal thoracic artery harvesting and mitral annular suturing. Participants were novice robotic cardiac and noncardiac surgeons alongside experienced robotic cardiac surgeons who established performance benchmarks. Performance was evaluated using the time-based score and modified global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (mGEARS). RESULTS: The participants were 15 novice surgeons (7 cardiac; 8 noncardiac) and 4 experienced robotic surgeons. Most novices reached mastery in 52 (±22) min for atrial closure, 32 (±18) for internal thoracic artery harvesting and 34 (±12) for mitral stitches, with no significant differences between the cardiac and noncardiac surgeons. However, for mGEARS, noncardiac novices faced more challenges in internal thoracic artery harvesting. The Thurstone learning curve model indicated no significant difference in the learning rates between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wet lab simulation facilitates the rapid acquisition of robotic cardiac surgical skills to expert levels, irrespective of surgeons' experience in open cardiac surgery. These findings support the use of wet lab simulators for standardized, competency-based training in robotic cardiac surgery.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Navarra, Emiliano $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale San Carlo di Nancy, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Valdis, Matthew $u Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
700    1_
$a Sandoval, Elena $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Hashemi, Nasseh $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark $u Nordsim, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
700    1_
$a Cerny, Stepan $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277706402
700    1_
$a Pereda, Daniel $u Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain $u Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000205268722
700    1_
$a Palmen, Meindert $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands $u Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272135452
700    1_
$a Bjerrum, Flemming $u Gastrounit, Surgical Section, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark $u Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR & Education, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
700    1_
$a Bruun, Niels Henrik $u Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
700    1_
$a Tolsgaard, Martin G $u Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR & Education, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark $u Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
773    0_
$w MED00216303 $t Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery $x 2753-670X $g Roč. 40, č. 1 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39786456 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250422095831 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2306481 $s 1245849
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 40 $c 1 $e 20241225 $i 2753-670X $m Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery $n Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg $x MED00216303
GRA    __
$p Biomedical Research Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace