• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Postinterventional fetal aortic regurgitation: prevalence, outcome and effects on fetal circulation in large single-center cohort

A. Tulzer, J. Hochpoechler, I. Scharnreitner, V. Tomek, R. Weber, E. Sames-Dolzer, M. Kreuzer, R. Mair, R. Mair, G. Tulzer

. 2025 ; 65 (3) : 325-333. [pub] 20250215

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25009639

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence and severity of fetal aortic regurgitation (AR) after undergoing successful fetal aortic valvuloplasty (FAV) and to evaluate its effects on fetal circulation and left ventricular (LV) growth. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all fetuses with critical aortic stenosis who underwent successful FAV at our center between 2010 and 2024 for whom postnatal echocardiograms were available in digital format. Fetal and postnatal echocardiographic examinations were analyzed for ventricular and valvular dimensions and characteristics, and Z-scores were calculated for middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI), umbilical artery (UA) PI and cerebroplacental ratio. AR severity was classified into no/mild AR or significant (moderate/severe) AR. The balloon-to-aortic valve ratio (BVR) was calculated as the ratio between the maximum actual balloon diameter and the aortic valve (AV) annulus diameter. The primary endpoints of this study were the prevalence, severity and risk factors for fetal AR following successful FAV. RESULTS: Ninety-nine fetuses who underwent successful FAV were included. Immediate post-FAV echocardiograms showed that 87% of fetuses developed some degree of AR, including 45% of all fetuses with significant AR. BVR was significantly higher in fetuses with significant AR compared to those with no/mild AR (mean, 1.09 (95% CI, 1.06-1.12) vs 1.02 (95% CI, 0.99-1.04); P < 0.001). In a subgroup of 66/99 fetuses with available postnatal echocardiograms, the prevalence of AR decreased significantly from 86% before birth to 58% after birth (P < 0.001), with the proportion of fetuses with significant AR reducing from 47% before birth to 17% after birth (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort of fetuses, AV maximum velocity (Vmax) increased significantly from post-FAV to after birth (mean, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.75-2.11) m/s vs 3.21 (95% CI, 2.89-3.55) m/s; P < 0.001), regardless of AR severity, but Vmax after birth was lower in the significant-AR group compared with the no/mild-AR group (mean, 2.85 m/s vs 3.55 m/s; P = 0.020). Fetuses with significant AR exhibited higher relative LV length increases from immediately post-FAV to after birth than did those with no/mild AR (25% (95% CI, 16-33%) vs 14% (95% CI, 6-21%); P = 0.044), although there was no significant difference in mean LV length Z-score after birth between the two groups. FAV led to significant short-term increases in MCA-PI and UA-PI Z-scores, with greater increases observed in fetuses with significant AR. CONCLUSIONS: FAV is associated with a high prevalence of fetal AR, which lessens in severity over the course of gestation. Significant fetal AR had the largest association with greater BVR and had significant impact on fetal hemodynamics. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25009639
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429135101.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/uog.29182 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39954230
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Tulzer, A $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000240347987
245    10
$a Postinterventional fetal aortic regurgitation: prevalence, outcome and effects on fetal circulation in large single-center cohort / $c A. Tulzer, J. Hochpoechler, I. Scharnreitner, V. Tomek, R. Weber, E. Sames-Dolzer, M. Kreuzer, R. Mair, R. Mair, G. Tulzer
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: To analyze the prevalence and severity of fetal aortic regurgitation (AR) after undergoing successful fetal aortic valvuloplasty (FAV) and to evaluate its effects on fetal circulation and left ventricular (LV) growth. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all fetuses with critical aortic stenosis who underwent successful FAV at our center between 2010 and 2024 for whom postnatal echocardiograms were available in digital format. Fetal and postnatal echocardiographic examinations were analyzed for ventricular and valvular dimensions and characteristics, and Z-scores were calculated for middle cerebral artery (MCA) pulsatility index (PI), umbilical artery (UA) PI and cerebroplacental ratio. AR severity was classified into no/mild AR or significant (moderate/severe) AR. The balloon-to-aortic valve ratio (BVR) was calculated as the ratio between the maximum actual balloon diameter and the aortic valve (AV) annulus diameter. The primary endpoints of this study were the prevalence, severity and risk factors for fetal AR following successful FAV. RESULTS: Ninety-nine fetuses who underwent successful FAV were included. Immediate post-FAV echocardiograms showed that 87% of fetuses developed some degree of AR, including 45% of all fetuses with significant AR. BVR was significantly higher in fetuses with significant AR compared to those with no/mild AR (mean, 1.09 (95% CI, 1.06-1.12) vs 1.02 (95% CI, 0.99-1.04); P < 0.001). In a subgroup of 66/99 fetuses with available postnatal echocardiograms, the prevalence of AR decreased significantly from 86% before birth to 58% after birth (P < 0.001), with the proportion of fetuses with significant AR reducing from 47% before birth to 17% after birth (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort of fetuses, AV maximum velocity (Vmax) increased significantly from post-FAV to after birth (mean, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.75-2.11) m/s vs 3.21 (95% CI, 2.89-3.55) m/s; P < 0.001), regardless of AR severity, but Vmax after birth was lower in the significant-AR group compared with the no/mild-AR group (mean, 2.85 m/s vs 3.55 m/s; P = 0.020). Fetuses with significant AR exhibited higher relative LV length increases from immediately post-FAV to after birth than did those with no/mild AR (25% (95% CI, 16-33%) vs 14% (95% CI, 6-21%); P = 0.044), although there was no significant difference in mean LV length Z-score after birth between the two groups. FAV led to significant short-term increases in MCA-PI and UA-PI Z-scores, with greater increases observed in fetuses with significant AR. CONCLUSIONS: FAV is associated with a high prevalence of fetal AR, which lessens in severity over the course of gestation. Significant fetal AR had the largest association with greater BVR and had significant impact on fetal hemodynamics. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a aortální insuficience $x diagnostické zobrazování $x epidemiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D001022
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    12
$a ultrasonografie prenatální $7 D016216
650    12
$a balónková valvuloplastika $7 D063126
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a echokardiografie $x metody $7 D004452
650    _2
$a aortální stenóza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x embryologie $x epidemiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D001024
650    _2
$a nemoci plodu $x epidemiologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D005315
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a gestační stáří $7 D005865
650    _2
$a aortální chlopeň $x diagnostické zobrazování $x embryologie $7 D001021
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a fetální srdce $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D005318
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hochpoechler, J $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
700    1_
$a Scharnreitner, I $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $u Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
700    1_
$a Tomek, V $u Children's Heart Center, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Weber, R $u Pediatric Heart Center Zurich, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Sames-Dolzer, E $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
700    1_
$a Kreuzer, M $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
700    1_
$a Mair, R $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
700    1_
$a Mair, R $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Division of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
700    1_
$a Tulzer, G $u Children's Heart Center Linz, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria $u Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304730257
773    0_
$w MED00010717 $t Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $x 1469-0705 $g Roč. 65, č. 3 (2025), s. 325-333
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39954230 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429135057 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311171 $s 1246720
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 65 $c 3 $d 325-333 $e 20250215 $i 1469-0705 $m Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology $n Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol $x MED00010717
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...