-
Something wrong with this record ?
The tibiofibular mortise - anatomical controversies and their clinical importance: a historical and pictorial essay
J. Bartoníček, O. Naňka
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Historical Article, Review
Grant support
22-10-00240
Czech Health research Council
- MeSH
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Fibula * anatomy & histology MeSH
- Ankle Joint * anatomy & histology MeSH
- Clinical Relevance MeSH
- Ligaments, Articular * anatomy & histology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Terminology as Topic MeSH
- Tibia anatomy & histology MeSH
- Check Tag
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Historical Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
INTRODUCTION: During 280 years of studies of the anatomy of the distal tibiofibular articulation, there have arisen many unclear issues regarding the description of individual structures and their terminology. These historical inaccuracies were subsequently reflected in the clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of original publications and historical sources was performed. RESULTS: The distal tibiofibular articulation is a synovial joint, rather than a syndesmosis, as it is an integral part of the ankle joint. The interosseous tibiofibular ligament (ITFL), described for the first time by a French anatomist Bichat in 1801, is the strongest ligament of the tibiofibular mortise. Unfortunately, this clinically important ligament is not recognized by the current international anatomical nomenclature. The terms anterior inferior (AITFL) and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligaments (PITFL) are historical remnants "reimported" from the American/British literature and should not be used, because the analogous superior ligaments do not exist. The intermalleolar ligament, first described by Weitbrecht in 1742, is a variable, but constant, structure reinforcing the posterior capsule of the ankle joint. The term inferior transverse ligament (IFT) denoting in the English literature the inferior part of the posterior tibiofibular ligament was originally used for the intermalleolar ligament. The IFT ligament is a part of the posterior tibiofibular ligament and there is no reason to stress its importance. CONCLUSION: The chaos in the anatomy, terminology and depiction of the articulation of the distal tibia and fibula, unparalleled in any other joint of the human body, is the result of historical development. A certain negative role was, in this respect, played also by Basiliensia Nomina Anatomica (1895), that eradicated ITFL and called the distal tibiofibular joint a syndesmosis.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25010048
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134642.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415s2025 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00264-024-06403-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39747470
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Bartoníček, Jan $u Department of Orthopedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Central Military Hospital, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, Prague 6, Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, Prague 2, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The tibiofibular mortise - anatomical controversies and their clinical importance: a historical and pictorial essay / $c J. Bartoníček, O. Naňka
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: During 280 years of studies of the anatomy of the distal tibiofibular articulation, there have arisen many unclear issues regarding the description of individual structures and their terminology. These historical inaccuracies were subsequently reflected in the clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of original publications and historical sources was performed. RESULTS: The distal tibiofibular articulation is a synovial joint, rather than a syndesmosis, as it is an integral part of the ankle joint. The interosseous tibiofibular ligament (ITFL), described for the first time by a French anatomist Bichat in 1801, is the strongest ligament of the tibiofibular mortise. Unfortunately, this clinically important ligament is not recognized by the current international anatomical nomenclature. The terms anterior inferior (AITFL) and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligaments (PITFL) are historical remnants "reimported" from the American/British literature and should not be used, because the analogous superior ligaments do not exist. The intermalleolar ligament, first described by Weitbrecht in 1742, is a variable, but constant, structure reinforcing the posterior capsule of the ankle joint. The term inferior transverse ligament (IFT) denoting in the English literature the inferior part of the posterior tibiofibular ligament was originally used for the intermalleolar ligament. The IFT ligament is a part of the posterior tibiofibular ligament and there is no reason to stress its importance. CONCLUSION: The chaos in the anatomy, terminology and depiction of the articulation of the distal tibia and fibula, unparalleled in any other joint of the human body, is the result of historical development. A certain negative role was, in this respect, played also by Basiliensia Nomina Anatomica (1895), that eradicated ITFL and called the distal tibiofibular joint a syndesmosis.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a hlezenní kloub $x anatomie a histologie $7 D000843
- 650 12
- $a fibula $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005360
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 19. století $7 D049672
- 650 12
- $a kloubní ligamenta $x anatomie a histologie $7 D008023
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 20. století $7 D049673
- 650 _2
- $a tibie $x anatomie a histologie $7 D013977
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 18. století $7 D049671
- 650 _2
- $a terminologie jako téma $7 D009626
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 21. století $7 D049674
- 650 _2
- $a klinická relevance $7 D000092522
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a historické články $7 D016456
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Naňka, Ondřej $u Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U Nemocnice 3, Prague 2, Prague, Czech Republic. Ondrej.Nanka@lf1.cuni.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 49, č. 2 (2025), s. 515-524
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39747470 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134638 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311424 $s 1247129
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 49 $c 2 $d 515-524 $e 20250102 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
- GRA __
- $a 22-10-00240 $p Czech Health research Council
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415