-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Does a Standardized Load Carriage Increase Spatiotemporal Gait Asymmetries in Police Recruits? A Population-based Study
A. Štefan, M. Kasović, L. Štefan
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39028219
DOI
10.1093/milmed/usae358
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biomechanika fyziologie MeSH
- chůze (způsob) * fyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- policie * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému * fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Although the effects of carrying loads on gait biomechanics have been well-documented, to date, little evidence has been provided whether such loads may impact spatial and temporal gait asymmetries under the different foot regions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to examine the effects of carrying a standardized police equipment on spatiotemporal gait parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this population-based study, participants were 845 first-year police recruits (age: 21.2 ± 2.3 years; height: 178.1 ± 10.2 cm; weight: 78.4 ± 11.3 kg; body mass index: 24.7 ± 3.2 kg/m2; 609 men and 236 women; 72.1% men and 27.9% women) measured in 2 conditions: (i) "no load" and (ii) "a 3.5 kg load." Spatiotemporal gait parameters were derived from the FDM Zebris pressure platform. Asymmetry was calculated as (xright-xleft)/0.5*(xright + xleft)*100%, where "x" represented a given parameter being calculated and a value closer to 0 denoted greater symmetry. RESULTS: When compared to "no load" condition, a standardized 3.5 kg/7.7 lb load significantly increased asymmetries in spatial gait parameters as follows: gait phases of stance (mean diff. = 1.05), load response (mean diff. = 0.31), single limb support (mean diff. = 0.56), pre-swing (mean diff. = 0.22), and swing (mean diff. = 0.90) phase, while no significant asymmetries in foot rotation, step, and stride length were observed. For temporal gait parameters, we observed significant asymmetries in step time (mean diff. = -0.01), while no differences in cadence and gait speed were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the additional load of 3.5 kg/7.7 lb is more likely to increase asymmetries in spatial gait cycle components, opposed to temporal parameters. Thus, external police load may have hazardous effects in increasing overall body asymmetry, which may lead to a higher injury risk and a decreased performance for completing specific everyday tasks.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25010255
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134732.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/milmed/usae358 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39028219
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Štefan, Andro $u Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10 000, Croatia
- 245 10
- $a Does a Standardized Load Carriage Increase Spatiotemporal Gait Asymmetries in Police Recruits? A Population-based Study / $c A. Štefan, M. Kasović, L. Štefan
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Although the effects of carrying loads on gait biomechanics have been well-documented, to date, little evidence has been provided whether such loads may impact spatial and temporal gait asymmetries under the different foot regions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to examine the effects of carrying a standardized police equipment on spatiotemporal gait parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this population-based study, participants were 845 first-year police recruits (age: 21.2 ± 2.3 years; height: 178.1 ± 10.2 cm; weight: 78.4 ± 11.3 kg; body mass index: 24.7 ± 3.2 kg/m2; 609 men and 236 women; 72.1% men and 27.9% women) measured in 2 conditions: (i) "no load" and (ii) "a 3.5 kg load." Spatiotemporal gait parameters were derived from the FDM Zebris pressure platform. Asymmetry was calculated as (xright-xleft)/0.5*(xright + xleft)*100%, where "x" represented a given parameter being calculated and a value closer to 0 denoted greater symmetry. RESULTS: When compared to "no load" condition, a standardized 3.5 kg/7.7 lb load significantly increased asymmetries in spatial gait parameters as follows: gait phases of stance (mean diff. = 1.05), load response (mean diff. = 0.31), single limb support (mean diff. = 0.56), pre-swing (mean diff. = 0.22), and swing (mean diff. = 0.90) phase, while no significant asymmetries in foot rotation, step, and stride length were observed. For temporal gait parameters, we observed significant asymmetries in step time (mean diff. = -0.01), while no differences in cadence and gait speed were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the additional load of 3.5 kg/7.7 lb is more likely to increase asymmetries in spatial gait cycle components, opposed to temporal parameters. Thus, external police load may have hazardous effects in increasing overall body asymmetry, which may lead to a higher injury risk and a decreased performance for completing specific everyday tasks.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a policie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016495
- 650 12
- $a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $x fyziologie $7 D016474
- 650 12
- $a chůze (způsob) $x fyziologie $7 D005684
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $x fyziologie $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kasović, Mario $u Department of General and Applied Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10 000, Croatia $u Department of Physical Activities and Health Sciences, Faculty of Sport Studies, Masaryk University, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000246606900
- 700 1_
- $a Štefan, Lovro $u Department of Physical Activities and Health Sciences, Faculty of Sport Studies, Masaryk University, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic $u Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, Catholic University in Ružomberok, Ružomberok 034 01, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277057801
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003360 $t Military medicine $x 1930-613X $g Roč. 190, č. 1-2 (2025), s. e259-e265
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39028219 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134728 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311555 $s 1247336
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 190 $c 1-2 $d e259-e265 $e 20250116 $i 1930-613X $m Military medicine $n Mil Med $x MED00003360
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415