Does a Standardized Load Carriage Increase Spatiotemporal Gait Asymmetries in Police Recruits? A Population-based Study
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39028219
PubMed Central
PMC11737305
DOI
10.1093/milmed/usae358
PII: 7717010
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biomechanika fyziologie MeSH
- chůze (způsob) * fyziologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- policie * statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému * fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Although the effects of carrying loads on gait biomechanics have been well-documented, to date, little evidence has been provided whether such loads may impact spatial and temporal gait asymmetries under the different foot regions. Therefore, the main purpose of the study was to examine the effects of carrying a standardized police equipment on spatiotemporal gait parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this population-based study, participants were 845 first-year police recruits (age: 21.2 ± 2.3 years; height: 178.1 ± 10.2 cm; weight: 78.4 ± 11.3 kg; body mass index: 24.7 ± 3.2 kg/m2; 609 men and 236 women; 72.1% men and 27.9% women) measured in 2 conditions: (i) "no load" and (ii) "a 3.5 kg load." Spatiotemporal gait parameters were derived from the FDM Zebris pressure platform. Asymmetry was calculated as (xright-xleft)/0.5*(xright + xleft)*100%, where "x" represented a given parameter being calculated and a value closer to 0 denoted greater symmetry. RESULTS: When compared to "no load" condition, a standardized 3.5 kg/7.7 lb load significantly increased asymmetries in spatial gait parameters as follows: gait phases of stance (mean diff. = 1.05), load response (mean diff. = 0.31), single limb support (mean diff. = 0.56), pre-swing (mean diff. = 0.22), and swing (mean diff. = 0.90) phase, while no significant asymmetries in foot rotation, step, and stride length were observed. For temporal gait parameters, we observed significant asymmetries in step time (mean diff. = -0.01), while no differences in cadence and gait speed were shown. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the additional load of 3.5 kg/7.7 lb is more likely to increase asymmetries in spatial gait cycle components, opposed to temporal parameters. Thus, external police load may have hazardous effects in increasing overall body asymmetry, which may lead to a higher injury risk and a decreased performance for completing specific everyday tasks.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Larsen LB, Tranberg R, Ramstrand N. Effects of thigh holster use on kinematics and kinetics of active duty police officers. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016;37:77–82.doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.06.009 PubMed DOI
Boffey D, Harat I, Gepner Y, et al.. The physiology and biomechanics of load carriage performance. Mil Med. 2019;184(1–2):83–90.doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy218 PubMed DOI
Salvendy G. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
Faghy MA, Shei RJ, Armstrong NCD, White M, Lomax M. Physiological impact of load carriage exercise: current understanding and future research directions. Physiol Rep. 2022;10(21):15502.doi: 10.14814/phy2.15502 PubMed DOI PMC
Walsh GS, Low DC. Military load carriage effects on the gait of military personnel: a systematic review. Appl Ergon. 2021;93:103376.doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103376 PubMed DOI
Seeley MK, Umberger BR, Shapiro R. A test of the functional asymmetry hypothesis in walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(1):24–8.doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.09.006 PubMed DOI
Lanshammar K, Ribom EL. Differences in muscle strength in dominant and non-dominant leg in females aged 20-39 years—a population-based study. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(2):76–9.doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.10.004 PubMed DOI
Shi P, Fang Y, Guo M, Yu H. The effects of asymmetrical loading on gait characteristics. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2015;60(1):31–7.doi: 10.1515/bmt-2014-0005 PubMed DOI
Park K, Sy JF, Horn GP, et al.. Assessing gait changes in firefighters after firefighting activities and while carrying asymmetric loads. Appl Ergon. 2018;70:44–50.doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.01.016 PubMed DOI
Zhang XA, Ye M, Wang CT. Effect of unilateral load carriage on postures and gait symmetry in ground reaction force during walking. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2010;13(3):339–44.doi: 10.1080/10255840903213445 PubMed DOI
DeVita P, Hong D, Hamill J. Effects of asymmetric load carrying on the biomechanics of walking [published correction appears in J Biomech 1992; 25(4): 467]. J Biomech. 1991;24(12):1119–29.doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90004-7 PubMed DOI
Majumdar D, Pal MS, Pramanik A, Majumdar D. Kinetic changes in gait during low magnitude military load carriage. Ergonomics. 2013;56(12):1917–27.doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.835871 PubMed DOI
Ozgül B, Akalan NE, Kuchimov S, et al.. Effects of unilateral backpack carriage on biomechanics of gait in adolescents: a kinematic analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(4):269–74.doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2012.2678 PubMed DOI
Umberger BR. Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking. J Biomech. 2008;41(11):2575–80.doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.024 PubMed DOI
Kasović M, Štefan L, Borovec K, Zvonař M, Cacek J. Effects of carrying police equipment on spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters in first year police officers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5750.doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165750 PubMed DOI PMC
Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Goffar SL, et al.. Identification of risk factors prospectively associated with musculoskeletal injury in a warrior athlete population. Sports Health. 2020;12(6):564–72.doi: 10.1177/1941738120902991 PubMed DOI PMC
Yavnai N, Bar-Sela S, Pantanowitz M, et al.. Incidence of injuries and factors related to injuries in combat soldiers. BMJ Mil Health. 2021;167(6):418–23.doi: 10.1136/jramc-2019-001312 PubMed DOI
Sharma J, Weston M, Batterham AM, Spears IR. Gait retraining and incidence of medial tibial stress syndrome in army recruits. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1684–92.doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000290 PubMed DOI
Chavet P, Lafortune MA, Gray JR. Asymmetry of lower extremity responses to external impact loading. Hum Mov Sci. 1997;16(4):391–406.doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(96)00046-2 DOI
van der Leeden M, Dekker JH, Siemonsma PC, Lek-Westerhof SS, Steultjens MP. Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(10):739–44.doi: 10.1177/107110070402501008 PubMed DOI
Robinson RO, Herzog W, Nigg BM. Use of force platform variables to quantify the effects of chiropractic manipulation on gait symmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;10(4):172–6. PubMed
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.
Maines JM, Reiser RF. Ground reaction force bilateral asymmetries during submaximal sagittal plane lifting from the floor. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36(2):109–17.doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.08.004 DOI
Birrell SA, Hooper RH, Haslam RA. The effect of military load carriage on ground reaction forces. Gait Posture. 2007;26(4):611–4.doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.008 PubMed DOI
Stuempfle KJ, Drury DG, Wilson AL. Effect of load position on physiological and perceptual responses during load carriage with an internal frame backpack. Ergonomics. 2004;47(7):784–9.doi: 10.1080/0014013042000193264 PubMed DOI
Quesada PM, Mengelkoch LJ, Hale RC, Simon SR. Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching. Ergonomics. 2000;43(3):293–309.doi: 10.1080/001401300184413 PubMed DOI
Heglund NC, Willems PA, Penta M, Cavagna GA. Energy-saving gait mechanics with head-supported loads. Nature. 1995;375(6526):52–4.doi: 10.1038/375052a0 PubMed DOI
Bobet J, Norman RW. Effects of load placement on back muscle activity in load carriage. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53(1):71–5.doi: 10.1007/BF00964693 PubMed DOI
Goffar SL, Reber RJ, Christiansen BC, et al.. Changes in dynamic plantar pressure during loaded gait. Phys Ther. 2013;93(9):1175–84.doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120103 PubMed DOI
Majumdar D, Pal MS, Majumdar D. Effects of military load carriage on kinematics of gait. Ergonomics. 2010;53(6):782–91.doi: 10.1080/00140131003672015 PubMed DOI
Park H, Branson D, Petrova A, et al.. Impact of ballistic body armour and load carriage on walking patterns and perceived comfort. Ergonomics. 2013;56(7):1167–79.doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.791377 PubMed DOI