-
Something wrong with this record ?
Psychometric analysis of the three item loneliness scale in the Czech Republic
Z. Meier, L. Novak, J. Helvich, P. Licka, P. Tavel
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583
ERDF/ESF project DigiWELL
CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583
ERDF/ESF project DigiWELL
CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583
ERDF/ESF project DigiWELL
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2013-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2013
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2013-12-01
- MeSH
- Depression psychology diagnosis MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Loneliness * psychology MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires standards MeSH
- Psychometrics * MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Anxiety psychology diagnosis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
BACKGROUND: There is a growing importance of loneliness measurement through valid and reliable instruments. However, to establish valid and reliable measures, there is a need to explore their psychometric properties in different research settings and language environments. For this reason, this study aimed to validate the Three Item Loneliness Scale (TILS) in the Czech Republic within a Slavonic language environment. METHODS: A sample of Czech adults (n = 3236) was used consisting primarily of university students. We utilized Classical Test Theory to assess TILS internal consistency, temporal stability, and factor structure. Item Response Theory (IRT) was used to estimate Differential Item Functioning (DIF), the discrimination and difficulty of the TILS items and to estimate the measurement precision of the whole scale. Construct validity was explored through the Spearman correlation coefficient using personality traits, depression, and anxiety. RESULTS: The results showed satisfactory reliability and validity of the TILS in the Czech Republic. The scale's internal consistency and temporal stability were found to be satisfactory (Cronbach's α = 0.81, McDonald's ω = 0.82, ICC = 0.71). The parallel analysis supported the unidimensionality of the TILS. The IRT results indicated that the highest measurement precision was reached in individuals with lower and above-average levels of loneliness. Significant correlations between the TILS scores, anxiety, depression, and personality traits supported the construct validity of the scale. Although the DIF analysis identified statistically significant differences in responses to items TILS_2 and TILS_3 based on education level and employment status (with no significant differences observed for TILS_1), the effect sizes of these differences were small. This indicates that, despite statistical significance, the practical impact on the scale's validity across these groups is minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The validated TILS provides a reliable and valid tool for assessing loneliness in the Czech Republic. Its brevity makes it a practical option for researchers and clinicians seeking to measure loneliness time-efficiently. Future studies should explore how adding new items could increase the measurement precision of the TILS.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25010305
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429135537.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s40359-024-02204-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39780277
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Meier, Zdenek $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, Univerzitni 244/22, Olomouc, 771 11, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Psychometric analysis of the three item loneliness scale in the Czech Republic / $c Z. Meier, L. Novak, J. Helvich, P. Licka, P. Tavel
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: There is a growing importance of loneliness measurement through valid and reliable instruments. However, to establish valid and reliable measures, there is a need to explore their psychometric properties in different research settings and language environments. For this reason, this study aimed to validate the Three Item Loneliness Scale (TILS) in the Czech Republic within a Slavonic language environment. METHODS: A sample of Czech adults (n = 3236) was used consisting primarily of university students. We utilized Classical Test Theory to assess TILS internal consistency, temporal stability, and factor structure. Item Response Theory (IRT) was used to estimate Differential Item Functioning (DIF), the discrimination and difficulty of the TILS items and to estimate the measurement precision of the whole scale. Construct validity was explored through the Spearman correlation coefficient using personality traits, depression, and anxiety. RESULTS: The results showed satisfactory reliability and validity of the TILS in the Czech Republic. The scale's internal consistency and temporal stability were found to be satisfactory (Cronbach's α = 0.81, McDonald's ω = 0.82, ICC = 0.71). The parallel analysis supported the unidimensionality of the TILS. The IRT results indicated that the highest measurement precision was reached in individuals with lower and above-average levels of loneliness. Significant correlations between the TILS scores, anxiety, depression, and personality traits supported the construct validity of the scale. Although the DIF analysis identified statistically significant differences in responses to items TILS_2 and TILS_3 based on education level and employment status (with no significant differences observed for TILS_1), the effect sizes of these differences were small. This indicates that, despite statistical significance, the practical impact on the scale's validity across these groups is minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The validated TILS provides a reliable and valid tool for assessing loneliness in the Czech Republic. Its brevity makes it a practical option for researchers and clinicians seeking to measure loneliness time-efficiently. Future studies should explore how adding new items could increase the measurement precision of the TILS.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a osamocení $x psychologie $7 D008132
- 650 12
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a úzkost $x psychologie $x diagnóza $7 D001007
- 650 _2
- $a deprese $x psychologie $x diagnóza $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $x normy $7 D011795
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Novak, Lukas $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, Univerzitni 244/22, Olomouc, 771 11, Czech Republic. l.j.novak@umcg.nl $u Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. l.j.novak@umcg.nl
- 700 1_
- $a Helvich, Jakub $u Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Licka, Patrik $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, Univerzitni 244/22, Olomouc, 771 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tavel, Peter $u Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacký University Olomouc, Univerzitni 244/22, Olomouc, 771 11, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00209158 $t BMC psychology $x 2050-7283 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2025), s. 21
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39780277 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429135533 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311581 $s 1247386
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 13 $c 1 $d 21 $e 20250108 $i 2050-7283 $m BMC psychology $n BMC Psychol $x MED00209158
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583 $p ERDF/ESF project DigiWELL
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583 $p ERDF/ESF project DigiWELL
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583 $p ERDF/ESF project DigiWELL
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415