• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Clinical Outcome Assessments for Spasticity: Review, Critique, and Recommendations

O. Gal, M. Baude, T. Deltombe, A. Esquenazi, JM. Gracies, M. Hoskovcova, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, R. Rosales, L. Satkunam, J. Wissel, T. Mestre, Á. Sánchez-Ferro, M. Skorvanek, MHS. Tosin, R. Jech, members of the MDS Clinical Outcome Assessments...

. 2025 ; 40 (1) : 22-43. [pub] 20241204

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25010452

Grantová podpora
LX22NPO5107 National Institute for Neurological Research Progamme EXCELES

BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a common feature in patients with disruptions in corticospinal pathways. However, the term is used ambiguously. Here, spasticity is defined as enhanced velocity-dependent stretch reflexes and placed within the context of deforming spastic paresis encompassing other forms of muscle overactivity. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims at evaluating the clinimetric quality of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for spasticity across different pathologies and to make recommendations for their use. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify COAs used to assess spasticity. An international expert panel evaluated the measurement properties in the included COAs. Recommendations were based on the MDS-COA program methodology based on three criteria: if the COA was (1) applied to patients with spastic paresis, (2) used by others beyond the developers, and (3) determined to be reliable, valid, and sensitive to change in patients with spasticity. RESULTS: We identified 72 COAs of which 17 clinician-reported outcomes (ClinROs) and 6 patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were reviewed. The Tardieu Scale was the only ClinRO recommended for assessing spasticity. One ClinRO-Composite Spasticity Index-and two PROs-Spasticity 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale and 88-Item Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale-were recommended with caveats. The Ashworth-derived COAs were excluded after evaluation due to their focus on muscle tone rather than spasticity, as defined in this review. CONCLUSIONS: The Tardieu Scale is recommended for assessing spasticity, and two PROs are recommended with caveats. Consistent terminology about the various types of muscle overactivity is necessary to facilitate their assessment and treatment. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

BIOTN Laboratory EA 7377 BIOTN Université Paris Est Créteil Créteil France

CIBERNED Institute of Health Carlos 3 Madrid Spain

Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Department of Neurological Sciences Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA

Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology P J Šafárik University Košice Slovakia

Department of Neurology University Hospital of L Pasteur Košice Slovakia

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation CHU UCL Namur Site Godinne Yvoir Belgium

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital Edmonton Alberta Canada

Faculty of Medicine and Surgery Research Center for Health Sciences and Dept Of Neuroscience University of Santo Tomas Manila Philippines

Jefferson Moss Magee Rehabilitation Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Movement Disorders Unit Neurology Department Hospital Universitario Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain

National Centre of Epidemiology Institute of Health Carlos 3 Madrid Spain

Neurology and Psychosomatic at Wittenbergplatz Berlin Germany

Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinic Division of Neurology Department of Medicine The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

Service de Neurorééducation Université de Corse Centre Hospitalier de Bastia Bastia France

Service de Rééducation Neurolocomotrice Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor Assistance publique Hôpitaux de Paris Créteil France

University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

University of Potsdam Potsdam Germany

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25010452
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250429134736.0
007      
ta
008      
250415s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mds.30062 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39629752
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Gal, Ota $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000286142776 $7 xx0172029
245    10
$a Clinical Outcome Assessments for Spasticity: Review, Critique, and Recommendations / $c O. Gal, M. Baude, T. Deltombe, A. Esquenazi, JM. Gracies, M. Hoskovcova, C. Rodriguez-Blazquez, R. Rosales, L. Satkunam, J. Wissel, T. Mestre, Á. Sánchez-Ferro, M. Skorvanek, MHS. Tosin, R. Jech, members of the MDS Clinical Outcome Assessments Scientific Evaluation Committee and MDS Spasticity Study group
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a common feature in patients with disruptions in corticospinal pathways. However, the term is used ambiguously. Here, spasticity is defined as enhanced velocity-dependent stretch reflexes and placed within the context of deforming spastic paresis encompassing other forms of muscle overactivity. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims at evaluating the clinimetric quality of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for spasticity across different pathologies and to make recommendations for their use. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify COAs used to assess spasticity. An international expert panel evaluated the measurement properties in the included COAs. Recommendations were based on the MDS-COA program methodology based on three criteria: if the COA was (1) applied to patients with spastic paresis, (2) used by others beyond the developers, and (3) determined to be reliable, valid, and sensitive to change in patients with spasticity. RESULTS: We identified 72 COAs of which 17 clinician-reported outcomes (ClinROs) and 6 patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were reviewed. The Tardieu Scale was the only ClinRO recommended for assessing spasticity. One ClinRO-Composite Spasticity Index-and two PROs-Spasticity 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale and 88-Item Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale-were recommended with caveats. The Ashworth-derived COAs were excluded after evaluation due to their focus on muscle tone rather than spasticity, as defined in this review. CONCLUSIONS: The Tardieu Scale is recommended for assessing spasticity, and two PROs are recommended with caveats. Consistent terminology about the various types of muscle overactivity is necessary to facilitate their assessment and treatment. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a svalová spasticita $x patofyziologie $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D009128
650    12
$a hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče $x normy $7 D017063
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Baude, Marjolaine $u Service de Rééducation Neurolocomotrice, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France $u BIOTN Laboratory, EA 7377 BIOTN, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
700    1_
$a Deltombe, Thierry $u Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, CHU UCL Namur Site Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium
700    1_
$a Esquenazi, Alberto $u Jefferson Moss-Magee Rehabilitation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
700    1_
$a Gracies, Jean-Michel $u BIOTN Laboratory, EA 7377 BIOTN, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France $u Service de Neurorééducation, Université de Corse, Centre Hospitalier de Bastia, Bastia, France
700    1_
$a Hoskovcova, Martina $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rodriguez-Blazquez, Carmen $u National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain $u CIBERNED, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Rosales, Raymond $u Faculty of Medicine and Surgery-Research Center for Health Sciences and Dept. Of Neuroscience, University of Santo Tomas (and Hospital), Manila, Philippines
700    1_
$a Satkunam, Lalith $u Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada $u Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
700    1_
$a Wissel, Jörg $u Neurology and Psychosomatic at Wittenbergplatz, Berlin, Germany $u University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000162383578
700    1_
$a Mestre, Tiago $u Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinic, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada $u University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
700    1_
$a Sánchez-Ferro, Álvaro $u CIBERNED, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain $u Movement Disorders Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (imas12) 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Skorvanek, Matej $u Department of Neurology, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital of L. Pasteur, Košice, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000154978715 $7 xx0225963
700    1_
$a Tosin, Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira $u Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA $1 https://orcid.org/0000000173091407
700    1_
$a Jech, Robert $u Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Neurology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000297328947 $7 xx0082225
710    2_
$a members of the MDS Clinical Outcome Assessments Scientific Evaluation Committee and MDS Spasticity Study group
773    0_
$w MED00003420 $t Movement disorders $x 1531-8257 $g Roč. 40, č. 1 (2025), s. 22-43
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39629752 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250415 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250429134732 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2311669 $s 1247533
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 40 $c 1 $d 22-43 $e 20241204 $i 1531-8257 $m Movement disorders $n Mov Disord $x MED00003420
GRA    __
$a LX22NPO5107 $p National Institute for Neurological Research Progamme EXCELES
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250415

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...