-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Findings and Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction During Pregnancy
L. Cattani, D. Van Schoubroeck, A. Samešova, B. Packet, S. Housmans, J. Deprest
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2010-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Anal Canal diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence diagnostic imaging etiology physiopathology MeSH
- Pregnancy Complications * diagnostic imaging physiopathology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pelvic Floor Disorders * diagnostic imaging physiopathology etiology MeSH
- Pelvic Floor * diagnostic imaging physiopathology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Ultrasonography MeSH
- Urethra diagnostic imaging physiopathology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pregnancy and childbirth predispose to pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), coinciding with functional and anatomical changes in the pelvic floor. To some extent, these can be assessed by transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), yet the correlation between ultrasound findings and symptoms has not been well elucidated. We hypothesised that pregnant women with PFD would show different findings at TPUS. METHODS: This is a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Pregnant women were asked to fill out standardised questionnaires on PFD and undergo TPUS at 12-14 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. We compared bladder neck descent, urethral rotation, retrovesical angle, pelvic organ descent, genital hiatus dimensions and the presence of anal sphincter defects between women with and those without PFD using t test and Fisher's exact test. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the correlation between TPUS findings and PFD severity. As this is a secondary subgroup analysis of participants who underwent TPUS, no sample size was determined upfront. RESULTS: At Valsalva, women with urinary incontinence had more pronounced bladder neck descent (p = 0.02) and urethral rotation (p < 0.01), as well as wider retrovesical angles (p = 0.04) and larger genital hiatus areas (p < 0.01). After controlling for age, BMI and parity, the retrovesical angle was the only persistent predictor of urinary incontinence. No correlation was observed between any TPUS marker and symptoms of either prolapse or anorectal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women, symptoms of urinary incontinence, but not of prolapse and anorectal dysfunction, are associated with differences in pelvic floor anatomy at TPUS.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25010584
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134642.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00192-024-05931-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39352426
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Cattani, Laura $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152323619
- 245 10
- $a Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Findings and Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction During Pregnancy / $c L. Cattani, D. Van Schoubroeck, A. Samešova, B. Packet, S. Housmans, J. Deprest
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pregnancy and childbirth predispose to pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), coinciding with functional and anatomical changes in the pelvic floor. To some extent, these can be assessed by transperineal ultrasound (TPUS), yet the correlation between ultrasound findings and symptoms has not been well elucidated. We hypothesised that pregnant women with PFD would show different findings at TPUS. METHODS: This is a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. Pregnant women were asked to fill out standardised questionnaires on PFD and undergo TPUS at 12-14 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. We compared bladder neck descent, urethral rotation, retrovesical angle, pelvic organ descent, genital hiatus dimensions and the presence of anal sphincter defects between women with and those without PFD using t test and Fisher's exact test. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the correlation between TPUS findings and PFD severity. As this is a secondary subgroup analysis of participants who underwent TPUS, no sample size was determined upfront. RESULTS: At Valsalva, women with urinary incontinence had more pronounced bladder neck descent (p = 0.02) and urethral rotation (p < 0.01), as well as wider retrovesical angles (p = 0.04) and larger genital hiatus areas (p < 0.01). After controlling for age, BMI and parity, the retrovesical angle was the only persistent predictor of urinary incontinence. No correlation was observed between any TPUS marker and symptoms of either prolapse or anorectal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women, symptoms of urinary incontinence, but not of prolapse and anorectal dysfunction, are associated with differences in pelvic floor anatomy at TPUS.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 12
- $a pánevní dno $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D017773
- 650 12
- $a komplikace těhotenství $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D011248
- 650 12
- $a onemocnění dna pánevního $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $x etiologie $7 D059952
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie $7 D014463
- 650 _2
- $a inkontinence moči $x diagnostické zobrazování $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D014549
- 650 _2
- $a anální kanál $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001003
- 650 _2
- $a uretra $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D014521
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Van Schoubroeck, Dominique $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272339527
- 700 1_
- $a Samešova, Adela $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000309695761
- 700 1_
- $a Packet, Bram $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000308921931
- 700 1_
- $a Housmans, Susanne $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium $1 https://orcid.org/0000000151484883
- 700 1_
- $a Deprest, Jan $u Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be $u Research Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK. Jan.deprest@uzleuven.be $1 https://orcid.org/000000024920945X
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 35, č. 12 (2024), s. 2423-2430
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39352426 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134638 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311764 $s 1247665
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 35 $c 12 $d 2423-2430 $e 20241001 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int Urogynecol J $x MED00002395
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415