-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty
T. Tomáš, V. Apostolopoulos, P. Brančík, L. Nachtnebl, M. Mahdal
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- cementování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
- kostní cementy MeSH
- kyčelní kloub diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- kyčelní protézy * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náhrada kyčelního kloubu * metody přístrojové vybavení škodlivé účinky MeSH
- protézy - design MeSH
- radiografie MeSH
- reoperace * MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- selhání protézy * MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is an increasingly common procedure due to the growing number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed worldwide. This study evaluates the long-term implant survival, functional outcomes, and radiographic performance of cemented femoral stem (Beznoska s.r.o., Kladno, Czechia) in rTHA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent rTHA with cemented stem between March 2012 and December 2023. The mean follow-up duration was 71.26(± 39.31) months. Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and failure modes were assessed. Radiographic changes were classified using the Gruen Zones system. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Cox proportional hazard models were applied to identify prognostic factors influencing implant survival. RESULTS: The five-year implant survival rate was 98.1%, declining to 83.9% at twelve years. The overall failure rate was 3.83%, with periprosthetic infection (4 cases) being the most common cause, followed by aseptic loosening (2 cases). Radiographic changes were observed in 24.03% of cases, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Functional outcomes were favorable, with a mean HHS of 81.28(± 5.74), comparable to outcomes reported for uncemented revision stems. Age, stem diameter, and stem length did not significantly impact implant survival. CONCLUSION: The cemented stem demonstrated favourable long-term survival, with high implant retention rates. Functional outcomes indicated overall satisfactory performance. Radiographic evaluation revealed localized changes around the implant, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Implant failure was relatively rare, with periprosthetic infection being the most common cause.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25015201
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731090828.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00264-025-06526-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40214745
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Tomáš, Tomáš $u First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne ́s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. tomas.tomas@fnusa.cz $u Faculty of medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. tomas.tomas@fnusa.cz
- 245 10
- $a Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty / $c T. Tomáš, V. Apostolopoulos, P. Brančík, L. Nachtnebl, M. Mahdal
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is an increasingly common procedure due to the growing number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed worldwide. This study evaluates the long-term implant survival, functional outcomes, and radiographic performance of cemented femoral stem (Beznoska s.r.o., Kladno, Czechia) in rTHA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent rTHA with cemented stem between March 2012 and December 2023. The mean follow-up duration was 71.26(± 39.31) months. Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and failure modes were assessed. Radiographic changes were classified using the Gruen Zones system. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Cox proportional hazard models were applied to identify prognostic factors influencing implant survival. RESULTS: The five-year implant survival rate was 98.1%, declining to 83.9% at twelve years. The overall failure rate was 3.83%, with periprosthetic infection (4 cases) being the most common cause, followed by aseptic loosening (2 cases). Radiographic changes were observed in 24.03% of cases, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Functional outcomes were favorable, with a mean HHS of 81.28(± 5.74), comparable to outcomes reported for uncemented revision stems. Age, stem diameter, and stem length did not significantly impact implant survival. CONCLUSION: The cemented stem demonstrated favourable long-term survival, with high implant retention rates. Functional outcomes indicated overall satisfactory performance. Radiographic evaluation revealed localized changes around the implant, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Implant failure was relatively rare, with periprosthetic infection being the most common cause.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019644
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a reoperace $7 D012086
- 650 12
- $a kyčelní protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D006622
- 650 12
- $a selhání protézy $7 D011475
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a kostní cementy $7 D001843
- 650 _2
- $a radiografie $7 D011859
- 650 _2
- $a protézy - design $7 D011474
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a cementování $7 D002484
- 650 _2
- $a kyčelní kloub $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D006621
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Apostolopoulos, Vasileios $u First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne ́s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. vasileios.apostolopoulos@fnusa.cz $u Faculty of medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. vasileios.apostolopoulos@fnusa.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Brančík, Pavel $u First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne ́s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nachtnebl, Luboš $u First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne ́s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Mahdal, Michal $u First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne ́s University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic $u Faculty of medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 49, č. 7 (2025), s. 1615-1624
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40214745 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731090823 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366199 $s 1252326
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 49 $c 7 $d 1615-1624 $e 20250411 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708