Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study

B. Sehnal, P. Waldauf, R. Matej, M. Hruda, H. Robova, J. Drozenova, T. Pichlik, J. Zapletal, L. Rob, MJ. Halaska

. 2025 ; 25 (1) : 638. [pub] 20250408

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25016146

Grantová podpora
FTN 00064190 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
Nr. NW24-09-00505 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
No. 207035 Univerzita Karlova v Praze

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different tracers ́ application techniques for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparotomy. Additionally, potential risk factors for SLN detection failure were assessed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 248 endometrial cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with SLN mapping between January 2020 and March 2024. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Group I + S consisted of 147 women with intracervical and subserosal tracers ́application and group I + I included 101 women with intracervical and intrafundal application. Successful detection of SLN on both sides was achieved in 39.9% (99/248) of all patients, in 38.1% (56/147) in the I + S group and in 42.6% (43/101) in the I + I group, respectively. SLNs were identified in 32.7% (81/248) of all patients on only one side of the pelvis, in 31.3% (46/147) in the I + S and in 34.7% (35/101) in the I + I group, respectively. No SLNs were detected in 27.4% (68/248) of all subjects, comprising 30.6% (45/147) from the I + S and 22.8% (23/101) from the I + I group. Although the success rate of SLN detection was higher in the I + I group and on the right side of the pelvis regardless of the detection method, these differences were not statistically significant. An age exceeding 66.3 years was recognized as a critical risk factor for successful detection, other followed factors did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. Additional significant risk factors were identified: depth of tumor myometrial invasion on the right side, history of pelvic surgery, and total tumor volume on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not reveal significant differences in SLN mapping success between the groups receiving intracervical + intrafundal and intracervical + subserosal tracers ́applications among endometrial cancer patients treated via open surgery. Overall, older age emerged as the most critical risk factor for SLN detection failure, while other assessed factors did not show a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institution University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. REGISTRATION NUMBER: EK-VP-21-0-2023. Date of registration 7-JUN-2023. This study was retrospectively registered in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25016146
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091542.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12885-025-14037-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40200256
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Sehnal, Borek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic. boreksehnal@seznam.cz $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic. boreksehnal@seznam.cz
245    10
$a Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study / $c B. Sehnal, P. Waldauf, R. Matej, M. Hruda, H. Robova, J. Drozenova, T. Pichlik, J. Zapletal, L. Rob, MJ. Halaska
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different tracers ́ application techniques for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparotomy. Additionally, potential risk factors for SLN detection failure were assessed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 248 endometrial cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with SLN mapping between January 2020 and March 2024. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Group I + S consisted of 147 women with intracervical and subserosal tracers ́application and group I + I included 101 women with intracervical and intrafundal application. Successful detection of SLN on both sides was achieved in 39.9% (99/248) of all patients, in 38.1% (56/147) in the I + S group and in 42.6% (43/101) in the I + I group, respectively. SLNs were identified in 32.7% (81/248) of all patients on only one side of the pelvis, in 31.3% (46/147) in the I + S and in 34.7% (35/101) in the I + I group, respectively. No SLNs were detected in 27.4% (68/248) of all subjects, comprising 30.6% (45/147) from the I + S and 22.8% (23/101) from the I + I group. Although the success rate of SLN detection was higher in the I + I group and on the right side of the pelvis regardless of the detection method, these differences were not statistically significant. An age exceeding 66.3 years was recognized as a critical risk factor for successful detection, other followed factors did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. Additional significant risk factors were identified: depth of tumor myometrial invasion on the right side, history of pelvic surgery, and total tumor volume on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not reveal significant differences in SLN mapping success between the groups receiving intracervical + intrafundal and intracervical + subserosal tracers ́applications among endometrial cancer patients treated via open surgery. Overall, older age emerged as the most critical risk factor for SLN detection failure, while other assessed factors did not show a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institution University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. REGISTRATION NUMBER: EK-VP-21-0-2023. Date of registration 7-JUN-2023. This study was retrospectively registered in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a nádory endometria $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D016889
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a sentinelová uzlina $x patologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000071036
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $x metody $7 D021701
650    _2
$a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Waldauf, Petr $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Matej, Radoslav $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hruda, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Robova, Helena $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Drozenova, Jana $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pichlik, Tomas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zapletal, Jan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rob, Lukas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Halaska, Michael J $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00008171 $t BMC cancer $x 1471-2407 $g Roč. 25, č. 1 (2025), s. 638
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40200256 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091536 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366764 $s 1253271
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 25 $c 1 $d 638 $e 20250408 $i 1471-2407 $m BMC cancer $n BMC Cancer $x MED00008171
GRA    __
$a FTN 00064190 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
GRA    __
$a Nr. NW24-09-00505 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
GRA    __
$a No. 207035 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...