-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study
B. Sehnal, P. Waldauf, R. Matej, M. Hruda, H. Robova, J. Drozenova, T. Pichlik, J. Zapletal, L. Rob, MJ. Halaska
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie
Grantová podpora
FTN 00064190
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
Nr. NW24-09-00505
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
No. 207035
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny * metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy MeSH
- nádory endometria * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sentinelová uzlina * patologie diagnostické zobrazování chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different tracers ́ application techniques for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparotomy. Additionally, potential risk factors for SLN detection failure were assessed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 248 endometrial cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with SLN mapping between January 2020 and March 2024. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Group I + S consisted of 147 women with intracervical and subserosal tracers ́application and group I + I included 101 women with intracervical and intrafundal application. Successful detection of SLN on both sides was achieved in 39.9% (99/248) of all patients, in 38.1% (56/147) in the I + S group and in 42.6% (43/101) in the I + I group, respectively. SLNs were identified in 32.7% (81/248) of all patients on only one side of the pelvis, in 31.3% (46/147) in the I + S and in 34.7% (35/101) in the I + I group, respectively. No SLNs were detected in 27.4% (68/248) of all subjects, comprising 30.6% (45/147) from the I + S and 22.8% (23/101) from the I + I group. Although the success rate of SLN detection was higher in the I + I group and on the right side of the pelvis regardless of the detection method, these differences were not statistically significant. An age exceeding 66.3 years was recognized as a critical risk factor for successful detection, other followed factors did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. Additional significant risk factors were identified: depth of tumor myometrial invasion on the right side, history of pelvic surgery, and total tumor volume on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not reveal significant differences in SLN mapping success between the groups receiving intracervical + intrafundal and intracervical + subserosal tracers ́applications among endometrial cancer patients treated via open surgery. Overall, older age emerged as the most critical risk factor for SLN detection failure, while other assessed factors did not show a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institution University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. REGISTRATION NUMBER: EK-VP-21-0-2023. Date of registration 7-JUN-2023. This study was retrospectively registered in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25016146
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731091542.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12885-025-14037-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40200256
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Sehnal, Borek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic. boreksehnal@seznam.cz $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic. boreksehnal@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study / $c B. Sehnal, P. Waldauf, R. Matej, M. Hruda, H. Robova, J. Drozenova, T. Pichlik, J. Zapletal, L. Rob, MJ. Halaska
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different tracers ́ application techniques for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparotomy. Additionally, potential risk factors for SLN detection failure were assessed. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 248 endometrial cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with SLN mapping between January 2020 and March 2024. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Group I + S consisted of 147 women with intracervical and subserosal tracers ́application and group I + I included 101 women with intracervical and intrafundal application. Successful detection of SLN on both sides was achieved in 39.9% (99/248) of all patients, in 38.1% (56/147) in the I + S group and in 42.6% (43/101) in the I + I group, respectively. SLNs were identified in 32.7% (81/248) of all patients on only one side of the pelvis, in 31.3% (46/147) in the I + S and in 34.7% (35/101) in the I + I group, respectively. No SLNs were detected in 27.4% (68/248) of all subjects, comprising 30.6% (45/147) from the I + S and 22.8% (23/101) from the I + I group. Although the success rate of SLN detection was higher in the I + I group and on the right side of the pelvis regardless of the detection method, these differences were not statistically significant. An age exceeding 66.3 years was recognized as a critical risk factor for successful detection, other followed factors did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. Additional significant risk factors were identified: depth of tumor myometrial invasion on the right side, history of pelvic surgery, and total tumor volume on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not reveal significant differences in SLN mapping success between the groups receiving intracervical + intrafundal and intracervical + subserosal tracers ́applications among endometrial cancer patients treated via open surgery. Overall, older age emerged as the most critical risk factor for SLN detection failure, while other assessed factors did not show a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Institution University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. REGISTRATION NUMBER: EK-VP-21-0-2023. Date of registration 7-JUN-2023. This study was retrospectively registered in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a nádory endometria $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D016889
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a sentinelová uzlina $x patologie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000071036
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $x metody $7 D021701
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Waldauf, Petr $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Matej, Radoslav $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hruda, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Robova, Helena $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Drozenova, Jana $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pichlik, Tomas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletal, Jan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rob, Lukas $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Halaska, Michael J $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Srobarova 1150/50, Prague 10, 100 34, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008171 $t BMC cancer $x 1471-2407 $g Roč. 25, č. 1 (2025), s. 638
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40200256 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731091536 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366764 $s 1253271
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 25 $c 1 $d 638 $e 20250408 $i 1471-2407 $m BMC cancer $n BMC Cancer $x MED00008171
- GRA __
- $a FTN 00064190 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- GRA __
- $a Nr. NW24-09-00505 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- GRA __
- $a No. 207035 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708