Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population

I. Hanzlíková, A. Ruská, K. Jančíková, K. Hébert-Losier

. 2025 ; 26 (1) : 317. [pub] 20250402

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated impaired proprioception and poorer responses to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and vestibular stimuli in individuals with generalized hypermobility, potentially leading to sensory processing issues. Therefore, we aimed to explore the influence of hypermobility on somatognosia and stereognosia. METHODS: Forty-six participants were assessed using the Beighton score and categorized into three groups: non-hypermobile (n = 20), symptomatic hypermobile (n = 13), and asymptomatic hypermobile (n = 13). Somatognosia was evaluated using the shoulder width test in the vertical plane and pelvic width test in the vertical and horizontal planes. Stereognosia was assessed with Petrie's test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was examined the relationship between the Beighton score and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. An unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between hypermobile (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and non-hypermobile individuals, while a one-way ANOVA was used to compare data between the three groups. RESULTS: No significant relationship was observed between Beighton scores and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. The t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups in the shoulder width, two pelvic widths, and Petrie's tests (all p ≥ 0.105). Similarly, one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups across these tests (all p ≥ 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that somatognosia and stereognosia are not significantly related to the Beighton score and do not significantly differ between the groups studied. These sensory processing functions are unlikely to contribute to the common complaints reported by hypermobile individuals. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25016187
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091601.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12891-025-08307-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40175960
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hanzlíková, Ivana $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 771 47, Czech Republic. ivana.hanzlikova@upol.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000222599312
245    10
$a No significant links between somatognosia, stereognosia, and hypermobility: sensory processing unlikely to drive common complaints in hypermobile population / $c I. Hanzlíková, A. Ruská, K. Jančíková, K. Hébert-Losier
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated impaired proprioception and poorer responses to tactile deep pressure, visual-tactile integration, and vestibular stimuli in individuals with generalized hypermobility, potentially leading to sensory processing issues. Therefore, we aimed to explore the influence of hypermobility on somatognosia and stereognosia. METHODS: Forty-six participants were assessed using the Beighton score and categorized into three groups: non-hypermobile (n = 20), symptomatic hypermobile (n = 13), and asymptomatic hypermobile (n = 13). Somatognosia was evaluated using the shoulder width test in the vertical plane and pelvic width test in the vertical and horizontal planes. Stereognosia was assessed with Petrie's test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was examined the relationship between the Beighton score and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. An unpaired t-test was used to compare variables between hypermobile (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and non-hypermobile individuals, while a one-way ANOVA was used to compare data between the three groups. RESULTS: No significant relationship was observed between Beighton scores and measures of somatognosia and stereognosia. The t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups in the shoulder width, two pelvic widths, and Petrie's tests (all p ≥ 0.105). Similarly, one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences between the three groups across these tests (all p ≥ 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that somatognosia and stereognosia are not significantly related to the Beighton score and do not significantly differ between the groups studied. These sensory processing functions are unlikely to contribute to the common complaints reported by hypermobile individuals. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a nestabilita kloubu $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $x psychologie $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D007593
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a stereognózie $x fyziologie $7 D013236
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a propriocepce $x fyziologie $7 D011434
650    12
$a agnozie $x diagnóza $7 D000377
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ruská, Aneta $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 771 47, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jančíková, Kristýna $u Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Třída Míru 117, Olomouc, 771 47, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hébert-Losier, Kim $u Division of Health, Engineering, Computing and Science, Te Huataki Waiora School of Health, University of Waikato, Adams Centre for High Performance, Miro Street 52, Tauranga, 3116, New Zealand
773    0_
$w MED00008193 $t BMC musculoskeletal disorders $x 1471-2474 $g Roč. 26, č. 1 (2025), s. 317
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40175960 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091556 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366787 $s 1253312
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 26 $c 1 $d 317 $e 20250402 $i 1471-2474 $m BMC musculoskeletal disorders $n BMC Musculoskelet Disord $x MED00008193
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...