• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Hope and Distress: A Cross-Country Study Amid the Russian-Ukrainian War

S. Esbit, A. Kaim, S. Kimhi, D. Bankauskaite, M. Baran, T. Baran, A. Cosciug, Y. Eshel, S. Dumbadze, M. Gabashvili, G. Jiglau, K. Kaniasty, A. Koubova, H. Maricano, R. Matkeviciene, M. Matichescu, M. Nazarov, D. Teperik, N. Kochiashvili, B. Adini

. 2025 ; 41 (2) : e70033. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25016208

Conflict deeply affects human experiences, frequently testing individual resilience to its breaking point and leaving enduring psychological and societal wounds. The current conflict in Ukraine, initiated by Russia's invasion in 2022, illustrates this phenomenon by altering regional relationships and triggering a major humanitarian crisis marked by extensive displacement, loss of life, and emotional turmoil. This study explores the factors influencing hope and distress in Ukraine alongside six nearby European countries during the ongoing conflict. A cross-sectional survey collected data primarily via internet panel samples from the Czech Republic, Georgia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine in the second year since the war's initiation. The current study utilised validated instruments, collecting data on levels of hope, distress, individual resilience, community resilience, societal resilience, morale, sense of danger, perceived security threats, and demographic characteristics. Hope and distress levels differ across countries, with Ukraine exhibiting the highest levels of both (3.74 ± 1.02 and 2.89 ± 0.87, respectively). Overall, average scores of hope were higher than average distress levels. Across the regression models for the seven countries, hope showed strong associations with individual (between β = 0.089 and β = 0.327) and societal resilience (between β = 0.206 and β = 0.514), while morale (between β = -0.104 and β = -0.479) and individual resilience (between β = -0.077 and β = -0.335) displayed a protective relationship against distress (all β values were significant, p < 0.01). Monitoring hope and distress is crucial during the Russian-Ukrainian war and other adversities, as these factors give insight into the current and future psychological states of affected populations. The results offer valuable information that can guide the development of tailored strategies to enhance hope and buffer distress in war-impacted countries, as well as those experiencing its broader effects. Fostering individual and societal resilience, alongside enhancing morale, may strengthen hope and mitigate distress amid adversity. Developing targeted interventions that address each population's unique needs, as well as their sociocultural and geopolitical contexts can enhance efficacy.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25016208
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091614.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/smi.70033 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40220000
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Esbit, Simon $u Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheba, Israel $1 https://orcid.org/0000000198681024
245    10
$a Hope and Distress: A Cross-Country Study Amid the Russian-Ukrainian War / $c S. Esbit, A. Kaim, S. Kimhi, D. Bankauskaite, M. Baran, T. Baran, A. Cosciug, Y. Eshel, S. Dumbadze, M. Gabashvili, G. Jiglau, K. Kaniasty, A. Koubova, H. Maricano, R. Matkeviciene, M. Matichescu, M. Nazarov, D. Teperik, N. Kochiashvili, B. Adini
520    9_
$a Conflict deeply affects human experiences, frequently testing individual resilience to its breaking point and leaving enduring psychological and societal wounds. The current conflict in Ukraine, initiated by Russia's invasion in 2022, illustrates this phenomenon by altering regional relationships and triggering a major humanitarian crisis marked by extensive displacement, loss of life, and emotional turmoil. This study explores the factors influencing hope and distress in Ukraine alongside six nearby European countries during the ongoing conflict. A cross-sectional survey collected data primarily via internet panel samples from the Czech Republic, Georgia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine in the second year since the war's initiation. The current study utilised validated instruments, collecting data on levels of hope, distress, individual resilience, community resilience, societal resilience, morale, sense of danger, perceived security threats, and demographic characteristics. Hope and distress levels differ across countries, with Ukraine exhibiting the highest levels of both (3.74 ± 1.02 and 2.89 ± 0.87, respectively). Overall, average scores of hope were higher than average distress levels. Across the regression models for the seven countries, hope showed strong associations with individual (between β = 0.089 and β = 0.327) and societal resilience (between β = 0.206 and β = 0.514), while morale (between β = -0.104 and β = -0.479) and individual resilience (between β = -0.077 and β = -0.335) displayed a protective relationship against distress (all β values were significant, p < 0.01). Monitoring hope and distress is crucial during the Russian-Ukrainian war and other adversities, as these factors give insight into the current and future psychological states of affected populations. The results offer valuable information that can guide the development of tailored strategies to enhance hope and buffer distress in war-impacted countries, as well as those experiencing its broader effects. Fostering individual and societal resilience, alongside enhancing morale, may strengthen hope and mitigate distress amid adversity. Developing targeted interventions that address each population's unique needs, as well as their sociocultural and geopolitical contexts can enhance efficacy.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    12
$a psychická odolnost $7 D055500
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a naděje $7 D065026
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a psychický distres $7 D000079225
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    12
$a ozbrojené konflikty $x psychologie $7 D000068337
650    12
$a psychický stres $x psychologie $7 D013315
651    _2
$a Ukrajina $7 D014455
651    _2
$a Rusko $7 D012426
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kaim, Arielle $u ResWell Research Collaboration, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel $u Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
700    1_
$a Kimhi, Shaul $u ResWell Research Collaboration, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel $u Stress and Resilience Research Center, Tel-Hai College, Tel-Hai, Israel
700    1_
$a Bankauskaite, Dalia $u Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
700    1_
$a Baran, Maria $u Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Baran, Tomasz $u Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Cosciug, Anatolie $u University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
700    1_
$a Eshel, Yohannan $u Stress and Resilience Research Center, Tel-Hai College, Tel-Hai, Israel $u Psychology Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
700    1_
$a Dumbadze, Salome $u Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
700    1_
$a Gabashvili, Manana $u Applied Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Georgian Institute of Public Affairs, Tbilisi, Georgia
700    1_
$a Jiglau, George $u University Babeș-Bolyai din Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
700    1_
$a Kaniasty, Krzysztof $u Department of Psychology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA $u Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
700    1_
$a Koubova, Alice $u Institute of Philosophy, Prague and Systemic Risk Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Maricano, Hadas $u Stress and Resilience Research Center, Tel-Hai College, Tel-Hai, Israel $u The Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
700    1_
$a Matkeviciene, Renata $u Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
700    1_
$a Matichescu, Marius $u West University of Timișoara, Timisoara, Romania
700    1_
$a Nazarov, Mykola $u Research Center for Regional Security, SUMY State University, Sumy, Ukraine
700    1_
$a Teperik, Dmitri $u Tallinna Tehnikaulikool, Tallinn, Estonia
700    1_
$a Kochiashvili, Nino $u Applied Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Georgian Institute of Public Affairs, Tbilisi, Georgia
700    1_
$a Adini, Bruria $u ResWell Research Collaboration, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel $u Department of Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243580872
773    0_
$w MED00008085 $t Stress and health $x 1532-2998 $g Roč. 41, č. 2 (2025), s. e70033
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40220000 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091609 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366803 $s 1253333
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 41 $c 2 $d e70033 $e - $i 1532-2998 $m Stress and health $n Stress Health $x MED00008085
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace