Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Prediction of Sinus Rhythm Maintenance After Electrical Cardioversion Using Spectral and Vector Cardiographic ECG Analysis

S. Hassouna, M. Hozman, D. Heřman, J. Veselá, V. Filipcová, F. Plesinger, Z. Bureš, P. Osmančík

. 2025 ; 30 (5) : e70105. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25021724

Grantová podpora
National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (CarDia)

INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) remains a treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aimed to find predictors of SR maintenance after ECV using spectral and vector cardiographic (VCG) analysis of ECGs. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AF referred for elective ECV were prospectively enrolled. A digital ECG recording was obtained before the ECV and was analyzed using spectral and VCG analysis. AF activity was analyzed using spectral analysis to determine the dominant frequency (DF), RI (regularity index), and OI (organizational index). QRS complexes were analyzed using vectorcardiography to determine the dXmean, dYmean, and dZmean (derivation of VCG signals). We used Lasso Logistic Regression (LLR) in five-fold cross-validation for feature selection and to build combined predictive models of SR maintenance. For model training and evaluation, data were split in a 60%-40% ratio for training and testing, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were enrolled (age 70.2 ± 10.6 years, 49 (61%) were men, BMI 29.7 kg/m2). At the 3-month follow-up, AF recurrence was present in 36 patients (45%). The best single VCG parameter to predict SR maintenance was dZMean (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.51, p < 0.001). VCG-domain parameters combined into the LLR model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. From the spectral analysis domain, the best predictor was DF (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.28-10.25), p = 0.006; spectral features led to an AUC of 0.76 when combined in the LLR model. Clinical features did not form a model since no features passed feature selection. Combining VCG and spectral analysis features led to an LLR model with an AUC of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The combination of spectral analysis of AF activity and VCG analysis of ventricular activity provided more accurate predictive information than either analysis alone.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25021724
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20251023075812.0
007      
ta
008      
251014s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/anec.70105 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40814275
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hassouna, Sabri $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000247370223
245    10
$a Prediction of Sinus Rhythm Maintenance After Electrical Cardioversion Using Spectral and Vector Cardiographic ECG Analysis / $c S. Hassouna, M. Hozman, D. Heřman, J. Veselá, V. Filipcová, F. Plesinger, Z. Bureš, P. Osmančík
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) remains a treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aimed to find predictors of SR maintenance after ECV using spectral and vector cardiographic (VCG) analysis of ECGs. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AF referred for elective ECV were prospectively enrolled. A digital ECG recording was obtained before the ECV and was analyzed using spectral and VCG analysis. AF activity was analyzed using spectral analysis to determine the dominant frequency (DF), RI (regularity index), and OI (organizational index). QRS complexes were analyzed using vectorcardiography to determine the dXmean, dYmean, and dZmean (derivation of VCG signals). We used Lasso Logistic Regression (LLR) in five-fold cross-validation for feature selection and to build combined predictive models of SR maintenance. For model training and evaluation, data were split in a 60%-40% ratio for training and testing, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were enrolled (age 70.2 ± 10.6 years, 49 (61%) were men, BMI 29.7 kg/m2). At the 3-month follow-up, AF recurrence was present in 36 patients (45%). The best single VCG parameter to predict SR maintenance was dZMean (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.51, p < 0.001). VCG-domain parameters combined into the LLR model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. From the spectral analysis domain, the best predictor was DF (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.28-10.25), p = 0.006; spectral features led to an AUC of 0.76 when combined in the LLR model. Clinical features did not form a model since no features passed feature selection. Combining VCG and spectral analysis features led to an LLR model with an AUC of 0.79. CONCLUSION: The combination of spectral analysis of AF activity and VCG analysis of ventricular activity provided more accurate predictive information than either analysis alone.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a fibrilace síní $x terapie $x patofyziologie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a elektrická defibrilace $x metody $7 D004554
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a elektrokardiografie $x metody $7 D004562
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    12
$a vektorkardiografie $x metody $7 D014672
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hozman, Marek $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Heřman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000274361154 $7 xx0073990
700    1_
$a Veselá, Jana $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Filipcová, Věra $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Plesinger, Filip $u Institute of Scientific Instruments of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bureš, Zbyněk $u Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Prague, Czech Republic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Osmančík, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000304824448 $7 xx0104796
773    0_
$w MED00007642 $t Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology $x 1542-474X $g Roč. 30, č. 5 (2025), s. e70105
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40814275 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20251014 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20251023075817 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2416870 $s 1259887
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 30 $c 5 $d e70105 $e - $i 1542-474X $m Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology $n Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol $x MED00007642
GRA    __
$p National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (CarDia)
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20251014

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...