Physiological characteristics of chemostatically grown Citrobacter freundii as a function of the specific growth rate and type of nutrient limitation
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
947835
DOI
10.1007/bf02883152
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adenosindifosfát biosyntéza MeSH
- adenosinmonofosfát biosyntéza MeSH
- adenosintrifosfát biosyntéza MeSH
- aerobióza MeSH
- chlorid amonný metabolismus MeSH
- Citrobacter růst a vývoj metabolismus MeSH
- energetický metabolismus MeSH
- Enterobacteriaceae metabolismus MeSH
- galaktosa metabolismus MeSH
- glukosa metabolismus MeSH
- pyruváty biosyntéza MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adenosindifosfát MeSH
- adenosinmonofosfát MeSH
- adenosintrifosfát MeSH
- chlorid amonný MeSH
- galaktosa MeSH
- glukosa MeSH
- pyruváty MeSH
Citrobacter freundii was grown aerobically in a chemostat on a mineral medium with galactose or glucose as carbon and energy sources under limitation by carbon or nitrogen source respectively. At various specific growth rates ranging from 7 to 95% mumax the culture in steady state was analysed and growth yield, specific metabolic rate of substrate utilization, intracellular concentration of pyruvate, ATP, ADP, AMP and energy charge were determined and plotted as functions of dilution rate. In all four types of experiments the physiological state of cells remained practically independent of dilution rate up to D=0.6 mumax, and at a given specific growth rate nearly independent on mumax and type of limitation. At approximately D=0.6 mumax, which is close to the maximum output dilution rate Dm, the physiological state of the cells changed: growth yields decreased and intr cellular pyruvate and adenylates concentrations increased. Consequently, in a given medium two dilution rates exist at which growth rate dx/dt is the same but the physiology of the population is quite different.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967;143(3):445-53 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1971 Sep;68(1):35-43 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1969 Apr;98(1):222-5 PubMed
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1969;23:47-68 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1958 Dec;19(3):592-606 PubMed
Biochem J. 1969 May;112(5):647-56 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1965 Apr;89:1026-31 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1956 Jul;14(3):601-22 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1965 Apr;89:1082-5 PubMed
Bacteriol Rev. 1962 Jun;26:95-107 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1971 Dec;108(3):1072-86 PubMed
Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris). 1967 Jan;112(1):119-21 PubMed
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Oct 12;163(991):224-31 PubMed
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 May 11;86:229-34 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1968 Apr;51(2):225-34 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1957 Feb;16(1):59-75 PubMed