Comparison of the absolute calibration method with the method of standard addition for the determination of halothane in blood by gas chromatographic headspace analysis
Language English Country Netherlands Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
- MeSH
- Cholesterol blood MeSH
- Chromatography, Gas MeSH
- Halothane blood MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Triglycerides blood MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cholesterol MeSH
- Halothane MeSH
- Triglycerides MeSH
As long-term exposure to exhaled halothane can be a cause of hepatitis and/or damage to the liver, the determination of halothane in blood is important in clinical practice. Gas chromatographic headspace analysis appears to be the most successful method. In the present study, two methods of quantitative evaluation of the analysis were compared by statistical treatment and direct comparison. The absolute calibration method was found to be unsuitable since it yields entirely unreliable results. This is due to different contents of lipoid and other components in the blood of the normal population, and this influences the vapour phase concentration of halothane and results in different values for the slopes of calibration curves for different blood samples. The standard addition method gives reliable results.
References provided by Crossref.org