Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
10656859
PubMed Central
PMC1637893
DOI
10.1289/ehp.00108173
PII: sc271_5_1835
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Air Pollutants MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Maternal Exposure * MeSH
- Infant, Premature * MeSH
- Infant, Low Birth Weight * MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Nitrous Oxide MeSH
- Sulfur Dioxide MeSH
- Obstetric Labor, Premature epidemiology MeSH
- Fetal Growth Retardation epidemiology MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Trimesters MeSH
- Pregnancy Outcome * epidemiology MeSH
- Air Pollution * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic epidemiology MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Air Pollutants MeSH
- Nitrous Oxide MeSH
- Sulfur Dioxide MeSH
This study tested the hypothesis, suggested by several recent reports, that air pollution may increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes. This study analyzed all singleton live births registered by the Czech national birth register in 1991 in 67 districts where at least one pollutant was monitored in 1990-1991 (n = 108,173). Maternal exposures to sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), total suspended particles (TSP), and nitrous oxides (NO(x)) in each trimester of pregnancy were estimated as the arithmetic means of all daily measurements taken by all monitors in the district of birth of each infant. Odds ratios of low birth weight (< 2,500 g), prematurity (< 37 weeks of gestation), and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR; < 10th percentile of birth weight for gestational age and sex) were estimated by robust logistic regression. The median (and 25th and 75th percentile) trimester exposures were 32 (18, 56) microg/m(3) for SO(2); 72 (55, 87) microg/m(3) for TSP; and 38 (23, 59) microg/m(3) for NO(x). Low birth weight (prevalence 5.2%) and prematurity (prevalence 4.8%) were associated with SO(2) and somewhat less strongly with TSP. IUGR was not associated with any pollutant. The effects on low birth weight and prematurity were marginally stronger for exposures in the first trimester, and were not attenuated at all by adjustment for socioeconomic factors or the month of birth. Adjusted odds ratios of low birth weight were 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-1.30] and 1.15 (CI, 1.07-1.24) for a 50 microg/m(3) increase in SO(2) and TSP, respectively, in the first trimester; adjusted odds ratios of prematurity were 1.27 (CI, 1.16-1.39) and 1.18 (CI, 1.05-1.31) for a 50 microg/m(3) increase in SO(2) and TSP, respectively, in the first trimester. Low gestational age accounted for the association between SO(2) and low birth weight. These findings provide further support for the hypothesis that air pollution can affect the outcome of pregnancy.
See more in PubMed
Arch Environ Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;50(6):407-15 PubMed
Epidemiology. 1995 Mar;6(2):115-20 PubMed
Environ Health Perspect. 1997 May;105(5):514-20 PubMed
Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;30(2):184-95 PubMed
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb 1;147(3):309-14 PubMed
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Jan;12(1):7-24 PubMed
Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Jun;27(3):450-3 PubMed
Am J Public Health. 1998 Sep;88(9):1343-7 PubMed
Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 15;58(18):4122-6 PubMed
Toxicol Lett. 1998 Aug;96-97:195-202 PubMed
Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jan;107(1):17-25 PubMed
Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):475-80 PubMed
Occup Environ Med. 1999 Aug;56(8):539-43 PubMed
Arch Environ Health. 1969 Apr;18(4):503-7 PubMed
Early Hum Dev. 1986 Dec;14(3-4):307-20 PubMed
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987 Jul;25(3):187-94 PubMed
Pediatrics. 1987 Oct;80(4):502-11 PubMed
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(5):461-6 PubMed
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1515-28 PubMed
Nature. 1992 Nov 19;360(6401):256-8 PubMed
Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):414-43 PubMed
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Jun;48(3):237-47 PubMed
Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:107-32 PubMed
Epidemiology. 1996 Jul;7(4):369-76 PubMed
Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature