OBJECTIVES: Outdoor air pollution has consistently been shown to predict mortality. The finding that this association is stronger in infants than in children or adults raises the question whether air pollution could also be related to pregnancy outcomes--such as birthweight and stillbirth. The association between outdoor air pollution and stillbirths and low birthweight in the Czech Republic, where air pollution was high, was examined. METHODS: An ecological study was conducted, with routinely collected data on stillbirths and low birthweight (< 2500 g), air pollution (total suspended particulates, sulphur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen oxides (NOx)), and socioeconomic factors (mean income, car ownership, divorce rate, etc). The analyses were restricted to 45 districts on which data on air pollution were available for the period 1986-8. The effects of exposure variables on frequency of pregnancy outcomes were estimated by logistic regression with district-years as the units of analysis. RESULTS: Stillbirth rate (4.2/1000 births in monitored districts) was not significantly associated with any indicator of air pollution, and was weakly related to mean income and proportion of births outside marriage. Crude prevalence of low birthweight (prevalence 5.5%) showed highly significant associations with several socioeconomic factors; after controlling for these, odds ratios (ORs)/50 micrograms/m3 increase in pollutant were: 1.04 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.96 to 1.12) for total suspended particles, 1.10 (1.02 to 1.17) for SO2, and 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) for NOx. When all pollutants were included in one model, SO2 remained related to low birthweight (OR 1.10 (1.01 to 1.20), p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with a recent study in China where birthweight was also associated with total suspended particles and SO2 but ecological studies must be interpreted cautiously. Residual confounding by socioeconomic factors cannot be ruled out. The association between air pollution and birthweight requires further investigation.

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health University College London UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1223-31 PubMed

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1515-28 PubMed

Lancet. 1992 Oct 24;340(8826):1010-4 PubMed

Nature. 1992 Nov 19;360(6401):256-8 PubMed

Scand J Soc Med. 1993 Jun;21(2):90-7 PubMed

Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):414-43 PubMed

Environ Res. 1994 May;65(2):218-25 PubMed

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Jun;48(3):237-47 PubMed

Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Oct;23(5):957-67 PubMed

Epidemiology. 1995 Mar;6(2):115-20 PubMed

Lancet. 1997 May 31;349(9065):1582-7 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 1997 May;105(5):514-20 PubMed

Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;30(2):184-95 PubMed

Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb 1;147(3):309-14 PubMed

Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 15;58(18):4122-6 PubMed

Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:107-32 PubMed

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987 Jul;25(3):187-94 PubMed

Am J Epidemiol. 1988 May;127(5):893-904 PubMed

Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):185-94 PubMed

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Mar;97(3):237-44 PubMed

Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature

The impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fine particles on pregnancy outcome

Fecundability and parental exposure to ambient sulfur dioxide

Outdoor air pollution, low birth weight, and prematurity