Fecundability and parental exposure to ambient sulfur dioxide

. 2000 Jul ; 108 (7) : 647-54.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid10903619

Recently it has been observed that birth rates in Teplice, a highly polluted district in Northern Bohemia, have been reduced during periods when sulfur dioxide levels were high. This study, which is based on data from 2,585 parental pairs in the same region, describes an analysis of the impact of SO(2) on fecundability in the first unprotected menstrual cycle (FUMC). We obtained detailed personal data, including time-to-pregnancy information, via maternal questionnaires at delivery. We estimated individual exposures to SO(2) in each of the 4 months before conception on the basis of continual central monitoring. Three concentration intervals were introduced: < 40 microg/m(3 )(reference level); 40-80 microg/m(3); and [greater than or equal to] 80 microg/m(3). We estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of conception in the FUMC using logistic regression models. Many variables were screened for confounding. AORs for conception in the FUMC were consistently reduced only for couples exposed in the second month before conception to SO(2) levels as follows: 40-80 microg/m(3), AOR 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.88; p < 0.011]; [greater than or equal to] 80 microg/m(3), AOR 0.49 (CI, 0.29-0.81; p < 0.006). The association was weaker in the second 2 years of the study, probably due to the gradual decrease of SO(2) levels in the region. The relationship between SO(2) and fecundability was greater in couples living close to the central monitoring station (within 3.5 km). The timing of these effects is consistent with the period of sperm maturation. This is in agreement with recent findings; sperm abnormalities originating during spermatid maturation were found in young men from Teplice region who were exposed to the increased levels of ambient SO(2). Alternative explanations of our results are also possible.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Androl. 1996 Nov-Dec;17(6):718-25 PubMed

Epidemiology. 1996 Mar;7(2):156-60 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 1997 May;105(5):514-20 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jun;105(6):608-12 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):475-80 PubMed

Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999 Jul;85(1):37-43 PubMed

Occup Environ Med. 1999 Aug;56(8):539-43 PubMed

Soc Biol. 1971 Sep;18:S9-15 PubMed

Environ Res. 1975 Feb;9(1):84-93 PubMed

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976 May;42(5):979-82 PubMed

Arch Sex Behav. 1978 Jan;7(1):13-30 PubMed

Hereditas. 1980;93(1):161-4 PubMed

Hereditas. 1982;97(1):159-61 PubMed

Am J Ind Med. 1983;4(1-2):285-91 PubMed

JAMA. 1985 May 24-31;253(20):2979-83 PubMed

Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;124(3):470-80 PubMed

Lancet. 1988 Dec 24-31;2(8626-8627):1453-6 PubMed

J Biosoc Sci. 1990 Jan;22(1):113-9 PubMed

Mutat Res. 1990 May;241(1):15-20 PubMed

Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Apr 1;133(7):734-9 PubMed

Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jun 15;133(12):1282-90 PubMed

Epidemiology. 1992 Jan;3(1):17-22 PubMed

N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 1;327(14):993-7 PubMed

Reprod Toxicol. 1992;6(4):297-307 PubMed

Stat Med. 1993 May 15;12(9):867-79 PubMed

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 Feb 18;709:29-45 PubMed

Fertil Steril. 1994 Jul;62(1):71-5 PubMed

Stat Med. 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15;13(5-7):671-81 PubMed

Q Rev Biol. 1995 Jun;70(2):141-64 PubMed

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Jun;49(3):314-9 PubMed

Arch Environ Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;50(6):407-15 PubMed

Mutat Res. 1996 Jan 16;359(1):25-9 PubMed

Occup Environ Med. 1997 May;54(5):289-95 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...