Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methotrexate in non-neoplastic diseases
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
12537514
DOI
10.2165/00003088-200342020-00003
PII: 420203
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antidota terapeutické užití MeSH
- antimetabolity škodlivé účinky farmakokinetika terapeutické užití MeSH
- intestinální absorpce MeSH
- kyselina listová terapeutické užití MeSH
- leukovorin terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- methotrexát škodlivé účinky farmakokinetika terapeutické užití MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antidota MeSH
- antimetabolity MeSH
- kyselina listová MeSH
- leukovorin MeSH
- methotrexát MeSH
Low dose pulse methotrexate (LDMTX) therapy has become effective in the treatment of autoimmune and lymphoproliferative diseases. The pharmacokinetics of LDMTX is individually highly variable, resulting in a different systemic exposure to the drug and a variable therapeutic/toxic effect in patients. The improvements and exacerbations of disease activity in relation to the introductions and discontinuations of LDMTX therapy suggest the possible immunosuppresive and anti-inflammatory properties of the drug. Because of a strong correlation between the drug pharmacokinetics and the therapeutic outcomes (pharmacodynamics), it seems to be possible to individualise the LDMTX therapy according to the results of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis. In the case of psoriasis, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis in our local study revealed a highly significant inverse relationship between PASI (expressed as a percent of the initial value) and a steady-state AUC(MTX) (area under the curve of methotrexate plasma concentrations; r(8) = -0.65, p < 0.001). The considerable inter-individual variability and low intra-individual variability in MTX pharmacokinetics, supports a role for therapeutic monitoring and dose individualisation at the start of pharmacotherapy. The results of this study suggest that a steady-state AUC(MTX) value of 700 nmol x h/L and higher are associated with a significantly better success rate of antipsoriatic therapy than lower values. The preliminary results in our follow-up study suggest the statistically higher incidence of unwanted effects depending on maximum plasma concentration of the drug. Moreover, statistically significant correlation was found between the toxic effects and exposure to the drug regarding methotrexate plasma concentrations and intracellular storage in erythrocytes. However, the data are still in the process of being completed and are not yet published.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 1;121(11):833-41 PubMed
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Feb;53(6):437-44 PubMed
Med Pediatr Oncol. 1982;10(4):401-11 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Jul;29(7):832-5 PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Sep;107(3):418-9 PubMed
J Pharm Sci. 1989 Feb;78(2):165-71 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Oct;37(10):1492-8 PubMed
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Aug;25(2 Pt 1):306-18 PubMed
Lancet. 1995 Mar 4;345(8949):544-7 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1998 Jan;25(1):36-43 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1994 Feb;21(2):203-8 PubMed
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Aug;54(2):147-56 PubMed
Cancer Res. 1965 Aug;25(7):1018-24 PubMed
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1977 Jul;85(4):511-8 PubMed
Acta Derm Venereol. 1986;66(6):515-9 PubMed
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 May;37(5):502-8 PubMed
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Mar;30(3):194-210 PubMed
Arch Dermatol. 1980 Apr;116(4):413-5 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1997 Nov;24(11):2230-2 PubMed
Acta Med Austriaca. 1988;15(5):140-4 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1993 Sep;20(9):1573-7 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Dec;51(12):1330-1 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1986 Apr;13(2):440-1 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Mar;33(3):330-8 PubMed
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991 Nov;50(5 Pt 1):547-56 PubMed
Br J Dermatol. 1994 Feb;130(2):204-10 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;20(6):950-2 PubMed
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1994;186:114-5 PubMed
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;46(4):369-76 PubMed
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;34 Suppl 2:20-5 PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 1989 Mar 1;110(5):353-6 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Jan;23(1):119-22 PubMed
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Apr;35(4):409-12 PubMed
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Nov;23(4):739-55 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Feb;35(2):129-37 PubMed
J Rheumatol Suppl. 1990 May;22:16-23 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1990 Aug;17(8):1008-10 PubMed
Br J Rheumatol. 1997 Nov;36(11):1196-204 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1995 Jan;22(1):38-40 PubMed
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Dec;29(3):148-58 PubMed
Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(1):20-5 PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Sep 1;127(5):356-64 PubMed
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978 Jan-Feb;3(1):1-13 PubMed
J Immunol. 1996 Jun 1;156(11):4408-14 PubMed
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993 Mar-Apr;11 Suppl 8:S97-9 PubMed
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1995 Jul-Aug;13(4):465-70 PubMed
Arch Dermatol Res. 1998 Dec;290(12):656-60 PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 1989 Aug 1;111(3):261 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 2000 Sep;27(9):2110-4 PubMed
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;27(5):607-10 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1990 Dec;17(12):1628-35 PubMed
Clin Nephrol. 1995 Jan;43 Suppl 1:S33-7 PubMed
Br J Dermatol. 1980 Apr;102(4):407-12 PubMed
BioDrugs. 2000 May;13(5):373-9 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Feb;58(2):79-84 PubMed
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1985 Jan;10(1):30-5 PubMed
Br J Dermatol. 1990 Jan;122(1):1-7 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Jun;35(6):611-4 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Jul;53(7):434-9 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1009-12 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1998 Mar;25(3):441-6 PubMed
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 May;37(5):453-6 PubMed
Am J Physiol. 1996 Feb;270(2 Pt 1):C522-9 PubMed
Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1990 Dec;4(3):575-93 PubMed
Acta Derm Venereol. 1975;55(4):291-6 PubMed
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Dec;92(12):2203-9 PubMed
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Jun;41(6):658-65 PubMed
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1997 Nov;23(4):969-80 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1989 Mar;16(3):313-20 PubMed
J Pediatr. 1998 May;132(5):830-5 PubMed
Acta Derm Venereol. 1992 Sep;72 (5):361-4 PubMed
Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):111-8 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):253-9 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 1998 Jan 15;101(2):295-300 PubMed
Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26(4):241-6 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1993 Jul;20(7):1121-5 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Jul;53(7):475-7 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Jan;33(1):9-18 PubMed
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Apr;27(5):277-92 PubMed
Rheumatol Int. 1998;18(2):59-62 PubMed
Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Feb;56(2):97-102 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1993 Nov;20(11):1845-9 PubMed
Drugs. 1994 Jan;47(1):25-50 PubMed
J Immunol. 1996 May 1;156(9):3435-42 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):795-803 PubMed
Ther Drug Monit. 1996 Apr;18(2):128-34 PubMed
Br J Rheumatol. 1995 May;34(5):421-8 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Jan;33(1):91-4 PubMed
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1985 May;10 (3):194-200 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1988 Sep;15(9):1356-60 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Dec;37(12):1770-3 PubMed
Oncol Res. 1997;9(5):259-63 PubMed
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;26(1):121-4 PubMed
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1990 Sep;15(5):358-60 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1989 Jun;32(6):677-81 PubMed
Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1070-1 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1991 Apr;18(4):609-10 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 1998 Jul 15;102(2):322-8 PubMed
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;49(4):285-92 PubMed
Arthritis Rheum. 1992 Feb;35(2):138-45 PubMed
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1966 Aug;37(2):233-45 PubMed
Ther Drug Monit. 1994 Dec;16(6):560-3 PubMed
J Rheumatol. 1994 Jun;21(6):1170-2 PubMed