Molecular diagnosis of culture negative infective endocarditis: clinical validation in a group of surgically treated patients
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, validační studie
PubMed
12591825
PubMed Central
PMC1767592
DOI
10.1136/heart.89.3.263
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bakteriální endokarditida diagnóza MeSH
- DNA bakterií izolace a purifikace MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody MeSH
- polymorfismus délky restrikčních fragmentů MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA bakterií MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical validity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based molecular methods in the microbiological diagnosis of culture negative infective endocarditis in a group of surgically treated patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Reference cardiovascular surgical centre. PATIENTS AND SAMPLES: 15 culture negative patients with infective endocarditis classified according to Duke criteria, with 17 heart valve samples; 13 age and sex matched control patients without infective endocarditis, with 13 valve samples. INTERVENTIONS: Medical records were reviewed and clinical, demographic, and microbiological data collected, including results of molecular detection of bacteria and fungi from valve samples. The clinical validity of molecular diagnosis was assessed, along with the sensitivity and speed of the systems. RESULTS: In the study group, 14 patients were PCR positive (93%). Organisms detected were streptococci (3), staphylococci (2), enterobacter (1), Tropheryma whippelii (1), Borrelia burgdorferi (1), Candida albicans (1), and Aspergillus species (2). Three cases were positive on universal bacterial detection but the pathogen could not be identified because of contaminating background. One case was negative. All but two positive cases showed clinical correlations. These two cases had no symptoms of infective endocarditis but there was agreement with the surgical findings. All control cases were PCR negative. Results were available within eight hours, and if sequencing was necessary, within 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: PCR based molecular detection of pathogens in valve samples from surgically treated culture negative infective endocarditis patients is fast, sensitive, and reliable. The technology, combined with thorough validation and clinical interpretation, may be a promising tool for routine testing of infective endocarditis.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Karchmer A. Infective endocarditis. In: Braunwald E, Zipes D, Libby P, eds. Heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine, 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2001:1725.
Zamorano J, Sanz J, Moreno R, et al. Comparison of outcome in patients with culture-negative versus culture-positive active infective endocarditis. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1423–5. PubMed
Brouqui P, Raoult D. Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:177–207. PubMed PMC
Moore J, Millar C. Is the polymerase chain reaction a useful tool or an expensive toy in culture-negative endocarditis? Commun Dis Public Health 2000;3:81–3. PubMed
Pazín GJ, Saul S, Thompson ME. Blood culture positivity, suppression by outpatient antibiotic therapy in patients with bacterial endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 1982;142:263–8. PubMed
Oakley CM. The medical treatment of culture-negative infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J 1995;16(suppl B):90–3. PubMed
Fournier PE, Raoult D. Non-culture laboratory methods for the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 1999;1:136–41. PubMed
Goldenberger D, Kunzli A, Vogt P, et al. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:2733–9. PubMed PMC
Grijalva M, Horváth R, Dendis M, et al. Is there already a place for molecular biology among current infective endocarditis diagnostic criteria? [abstract]. Cardiovasc Surg 2001;111:141.
Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. Am J Med 1994;96:200–9. PubMed
Bayer A, Bolger A, Taubert K, et al. Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis and its complications. American Heart Association Scientific Statement. Circulation 1998;25:2936–48. PubMed
Siebert P, Larrick J. PCR MIMICS: competitive DNA fragments for use as internal standards in quantitative PCR. In: Larrick J, ed. The PCR technique: quantitative PCR. Natick, Massachusetts: BioTechniques Books, Eaton Publishing, 1997:78–80. PubMed
Hricak V, Kovacik J, Marx P, et al. Etiology and risk factors of 180 cases of native valve endocarditis. Report from a 5-year national prospective survey in Slovac Republic. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;98:431–5. PubMed
Souto Meirino CA, Cotter Lemus LE, Assad Gutierrez J, et al. Infectious endocarditis at the National Institute of Cardiology “Ignacio Chavez”. Five year’s experience (1990–1994). Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1997; 67:46–50. PubMed
Habib G, Derumeaux G, Avierinos JF, et al. Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2023–9. PubMed
Braun S, Escalona A, Chamorro G, et al. Infective endocarditis: short and long term results in 261 cases managed by a multidisciplinary approach. Rev Med Chil 2000;128:708–20. PubMed
Bonow R, Carabello B, de Leon A, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular disease. ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines, executive summary. Circulation 1998;98:1949–84. PubMed
Ivert T, Dismukes W, Cobb C, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Circulation 1984;69:223–32. PubMed
Ali AS, Trivedi V, Lesch M. Culture-negative endocarditis – a historical review and 1990s update. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1994;37:149–60. PubMed
Gubler JG, Kuster M, Dutly F, et al. Whipple endocarditis without overt gastrointestinal disease: report of four cases. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:112–16. PubMed
Joblet C, Roux V, Drancourt M, et al. Identification of Bartonella (Rochalimaea) species among fastidious gram-negative bacteria on the basis of the partial sequence of the citrate-synthase gene. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:1879–83. PubMed PMC
Claeys G, Vanhouteghem H, Riegel P, et al. Endocarditis of native aortic and mitral valves due to Corynebacterium accolens: report of a case and application of phenotypic and genotypic techniques for identification. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:1290–2. PubMed PMC
Van Burik JA, Myerson D, Schreckhise RW, et al. Panfungal PCR assay for detection of fungal infection in human blood specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1169–75. PubMed PMC
Hendolin PH, Paulin L, Koukila-Kahkola P, et al. Panfungal PCR and multiplex liquid hybridization for detection of fungi in tissue specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:4186–92. PubMed PMC
Latge JP. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:310–50. PubMed PMC
Kanda Y, Akiyama H, Onozawa Y, et al. Aspergillus endocarditis in a leukemia patient diagnosed by a PCR assay. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1997;71:269–72. PubMed
Frothingham R, Blitchington RB, Lee DH, et al. UV absorption complicates PCR decontamination. Biotechniques 1992;13:208–10. PubMed
Meier A, Persing D, Finken M, et al. Elimination of contaminating DNA within polymerase chain reaction reagents: implication for a general approach to detection of uncultured pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:646–52. PubMed PMC
Perez-Vasquez A, Farinas MC, Garcia-Palomo JD, et al. Evaluation of the Duke criteria in 93 episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis: could sensitivity be improved? Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1185–91. PubMed
Dodds GA, Sexton DJ, Durack DT, et al. Negative predictive value of the Duke criteria for infective endocarditis. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:403–7. PubMed
Kaell AT, Redecha PR, Elkon KB, et al. Occurrence of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with nonspirochetal subacute bacterial endocarditis. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:1079–83. PubMed
Werner AS, Cobbs CG, Kaye D, et al. Studies in the bacteremia of bacterial endocarditis. JAMA 1967;202:199–203. PubMed
Corless CE, Guiver M, Borrow R, et al. Contamination and sensitivity issues with a real-time universal 16S rRNA PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1747–52. PubMed PMC
Sarkar G, Sommer SS. Removal of DNA contamination in polymerase chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 1993;218:381–9. PubMed
Hughes MS, Beck LA, Skuce RA. Identification and elimination of DNA sequences in Taq DNA polymerase. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:2007–8. PubMed PMC
Jinno Y, Yoshiura K, Niikawa N. Use of psoralen as extinguisher of contaminating DNA in PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 1990;18:6739. PubMed PMC
Orrego C. Organizing a laboratory for PCR work. In: Innis M, Gelfand D, Sninsky J, et al. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press, 1990:447–54.
Newton CR, Graham A. PCR, 2nd ed. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers,1997:36–42.
Reno W, McDaniel DO, Turner W, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of bacteremia. Am Surg 2001;67:508–12. PubMed
Moore JE, Millar BC, Yongmin X, et al. A rapid molecular assay for the detection of antibiotic resistance determinants in causal agents of infective endocarditis. J Appl Microbiol 2001;90:719–26. PubMed