Ultrastructural particularities of the spermatozoon of the cestode Electrotaenia malopteruri (Fritsch, 1886) (Proteocephalidae: Gangesiinae), a parasite of Malapterurus electricus (Siluriformes: Malapteruridae) from the river Nile, Egypt
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- Cestoda ultrastruktura MeSH
- cestodózy parazitologie veterinární MeSH
- elektronová mikroskopie MeSH
- nemoci ryb parazitologie MeSH
- sladká voda MeSH
- spermie ultrastruktura MeSH
- sumci parazitologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Egypt MeSH
The fine structure of the mature spermatozoon of the tapeworm Electrotaenia malopteruri (Fritsch, 1886), a member of a supposedly primitive group of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Proteocephalidae: Gangesiinae), was studied by transmission electron microscopy for the first time. The mature spermatozoon of E. malopteruri is filiform, tapers at both extremities, and contains two axonemes of 9+"1" trepaxonematan type. A helicoidal crested body (60-150 nm thick) is present at the anterior extremity of the gamete. The twisting cortical microtubules (CM) line the periphery of the spermatozoon continuously. The nucleus, a fine cord of moderately condensed chromatin, occupies the middle part (region III) of the spermatozoon. The slightly electron-dense cytoplasm contains electron-dense granules in regions II and III and becomes more electron-dense at the end of region IV. The anterior and posterior extremities of the spermatozoon contain a single axoneme. Two modes of disorganisation of the axoneme at the posterior end of the mature spermatozoa are described for the first time in cestodes. The present data also indicate that the sperm ultrastructure of E. malapteruri shows some characters typical for onchobothriid tetraphyllideans, but it resembles that of Cyclophyllidea in the arrangement of twisting of the CM.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Parasitol. 2004 Feb;90(1):23-9 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 1997;83(4):349-55 PubMed
Z Parasitenkd. 1975 Oct 31;47(4):269-81 PubMed
Syst Parasitol. 2003 Jul;55(3):199-209 PubMed
J Parasitol. 1998 Apr;84(2):385-408 PubMed
J Parasitol. 1997 Dec;83(6):1128-47 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2003 Jan;89(1):34-43 PubMed
Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 1980 Dec;57(4):323-47 PubMed
J Helminthol. 2000 Mar;74(1):73-81 PubMed
Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1976 Nov-Dec;51(6):673-4 PubMed
Mol Reprod Dev. 1992 Sep;33(1):39-45 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001 Jun;19(3):443-67 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2003 Nov;91(5):357-62 PubMed
Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1965 Jun 9;66(5):643-8 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 1994 Apr;24(2):225-35 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 2000 Sep;30(10):1109-13 PubMed
J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1997 Jan;29(1):115-24 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2002 Apr;88(4):285-91 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2003 Mar;89(5):345-51 PubMed
Syst Parasitol. 2004 Mar;57(3):159-71 PubMed
Syst Parasitol. 1999 Jan;42(1):1-12 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 2001 Aug;31(10):1121-8 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2003 Jul;90(4):318-24 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 1994 Apr;24(2):237-48 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 1998;84(3):239-45 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 1999 Nov;29(11):1841-52 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 1989;75(4):287-98 PubMed