Studies of radon-exposed miner cohorts using a biologically based model: comparison of current Czech and French data with historic data from China and Colorado

. 2004 Dec ; 43 (4) : 247-56. [epub] 20041130

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie, klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid15645313

The biologically based two-stage clonal expansion (TSCE) model is used to analyze lung cancer in several miners studies, two new ones (Czech, French) and two historic ones (Chinese, Colorado). In all cases, the model assumptions are identical. An action of radiation on initiation, promotion, and transformation is allowed. While all four studies indicate a highly significant action of radiation on promotion, the action on initiation is not significant in the French cohort, and barely significant in the Colorado miners cohort. No action on transformation is found in the Colorado miners, while the other data sets indicate a borderline significance. The model can describe all the data sets adequately, with different model parameters. The observed patterns in exposure, time since beginning of exposure, birth year, age and calendar year are reproduced well. The doubling exposure rate for initiation is about 3.5 WLM/year in the new data sets, while it is higher in the historic data sets. For transformation the doubling rate is about 20 WLM/year for the new data sets, while again the historic data give higher estimates. The action of radiation on promotion is quite different in the four data sets. These differences also induce different risk estimates at low exposures. The larger power of the new studies at these low exposures, compared to the historic data requires less extrapolation when the risk at very low exposures is estimated.

Komentář v

PubMed

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Radiat Res. 1999 Dec;152(6 Suppl):S59-63 PubMed

Health Phys. 1993 Apr;64(4):355-69 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):820-3 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1994 Aug;139(2):170-7 PubMed

Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):204-17 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1996 Feb;145(2):163-73 PubMed

Risk Anal. 2001 Feb;21(1):103-5 PubMed

Br J Dis Chest. 1979 Jan;73(1):1-17 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1994 Feb;137(2):251-61 PubMed

J Radiol Prot. 2002 Sep;22(3A):A71-4 PubMed

Int J Radiat Biol. 1992 May;61(5):625-9 PubMed

Radiat Environ Biophys. 1996 May;35(2):127-9 PubMed

J Radiol Prot. 2002 Sep;22(3A):A107-12 PubMed

Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(2):139-46 PubMed

Stat Med. 2002 Oct 30;21(20):3055-70 PubMed

J Radiol Prot. 2002 Sep;22(3A):A101-6 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1999 Feb;151(2):209-17 PubMed

Radiat Environ Biophys. 2004 Sep;43(3):189-201 PubMed

Stat Med. 2004 Nov 15;23(21):3333-50 PubMed

Br J Cancer. 1993 May;67(5):1090-7 PubMed

Radiat Environ Biophys. 2004 Sep;43(3):153-63 PubMed

Radiat Res. 1999 Oct;152(4):339-51 PubMed

Risk Anal. 1997 Jun;17(3):391-9 PubMed

Radiat Res. 2001 Jul;156(1):78-94 PubMed

Radiat Res. 2001 Nov;156(5 Pt 2):678-81 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...