Cytoskeletal alterations in interphase cells of the green alga Spirogyra decimina in response to heavy metals exposure: I. The effect of cadmium

. 2005 Dec ; 226 (3-4) : 231-40. [epub] 20051212

Jazyk angličtina Země Rakousko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid16333580

The aim of the study was to elucidate the effect of cadmium ions on the arrangement of the actin and tubulin cytoskeleton, as well as the relationships between cytoskeletal changes and growth processes in the green filamentous alga Spirogyra decimina. Batch cultures of algae were carried out under defined conditions in the presence of various cadmium concentrations. In control cells, the cytoskeleton appeared to be a transversely oriented pattern of both microtubules and actin filaments of various thickness in the cell cortex; colocalization of cortical microtubules and actin filaments was apparent. Microtubules were very sensitive to the presence of cadmium ions. Depending on the cadmium concentration and the time of exposure, microtubules disintegrated into short rod-shaped fragments or they completely disappeared. A steep increase in cell width and a decrease in growth rate accompanied (and probably ensued) a very rapid disintegration of microtubules. Actin filaments were more stable because they were disturbed several hours later than microtubules at any cadmium concentration used. When cadmium ions were washed out, the actin cytoskeleton was rebuilt even in cells in which actin filaments were completely disintegrated at higher cadmium concentrations (40 or 100 microM). The much more sensitive microtubules were regenerated after treatment with lower cadmium concentrations (10 or 15 microM) only.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Life Sci. 1997;60(21):1891-903 PubMed

Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Jun;42(6):594-8 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1999 Mar;119(3):1073-82 PubMed

J Membr Biol. 1992 May;127(3):161-72 PubMed

J Cell Biol. 1965 Nov;27(2):343-63 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(6):805-16 PubMed

Planta. 1978 Jan;140(1):7-14 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997 Jun 5;1357(1):5-17 PubMed

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1997 Jun;144(2):225-34 PubMed

Biol Trace Elem Res. 1984 Apr;6(2):139-58 PubMed

Toxicology. 1993 Jan 29;77(1-2):65-79 PubMed

Planta. 1988 Dec;173(4):442-6 PubMed

Toxicol In Vitro. 2003 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):539-46 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1998 Sep;118(1):159-72 PubMed

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996 Jul;139(1):115-21 PubMed

Planta. 1998 Jan;204(1):54-63 PubMed

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1993 Jul;121(1):22-9 PubMed

Cell Biol Int Rep. 1986 Jul;10(7):565-73 PubMed

Planta. 1990 May;181(2):162-8 PubMed

Protoplasma. 2003 Jun;221(3-4):227-35 PubMed

J Phycol. 1969 Dec;5(4):273-81 PubMed

Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Feb;20(2):271-5 PubMed

Science. 1962 Dec 28;138(3548):1404-5 PubMed

Planta. 1986 Apr;167(4):437-43 PubMed

J Phycol. 1969 Sep;5(3):240-59 PubMed

Water Res. 2001 Dec;35(17):4079-85 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace