Význam kvantitativního hodnocení transkriptů BCR-ABL pomocí real-time PCR pro efektivní lécbu chronické myeloidní leukémie
[Importance of quantitative evaluation of BCR-ABL transcripts using real-time PCR for effective treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia]
Jazyk čeština Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu anglický abstrakt, časopisecké články
PubMed
16468238
- MeSH
- bcr-abl fúzní proteiny analýza genetika MeSH
- chemorezistence genetika MeSH
- chronická myeloidní leukemie diagnóza farmakoterapie genetika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- inhibitory proteinkinas terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery analýza MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
- protinádorové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- reziduální nádor MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- anglický abstrakt MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bcr-abl fúzní proteiny MeSH
- inhibitory proteinkinas MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
- protinádorové látky MeSH
BACKGROUND: Molecular biology methods based on reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are able to detect the presence of BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this study we present our experience with monitoring of residual disease using real-time PCR with hybridization probes detection in patients treated with imatinib mesylate and in collected peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured the level of BCR-ABL transcripts in peripheral blood cells of 27 subjects before and in the course of the imatinib treatment. The median of relative quantity of BCR-ABL in the blood before imatinib therapy was 2.55%. The number of the transcripts in 23 imatinib-sensitive subjects decreased to 0.02% in 6 months. After 12 months of the treatment the BCR-ABL median was 0.005%. Subsequent levels fluctuated between values below the detection limit (DL, 0.001%) and 0.005%. Three patients were primarily resistant to imatinib with the BCR-ABL range of 0.13%-11.7% during the treatment. One subject showed marks of molecular relapse after 18 months of the treatment. Only two of 16 filgrastim-stimulated patients had BCR-ABL levels in the blood and in collected PBPC below DL. In other subjects BCR-ABL transcripts were determined within the measurable range of RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account prognostic importance, the measurement of BCR-ABL transcripts is an effective approach to monitoring of residual CML kinetics. Evaluation of BCR-ABL levels in collected PBPC can complete information on quality of the cells in potential autotransplants, and choose subsequent therapeutic protocols and patient prognosis.